RINO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Disappointing.
ping
What a dope.
Update: Breaking from Hawaii: No More Long-Form Birth Certificates!
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/12/breaking-from-hawaii-no-more-long-form-birth-certificates/
Levin is without question the absolute best. He’s no coward and no fool.
Has he forgotten the lesson of Watergate? “It’s not the crime, it’s the cover-up.”
That’s why I don’t listen to him anymore...
Anyone who wants to dismiss me as a ‘birther’, I can certainly dismiss him as a ‘talk show host’.
Mark Levin isn’t a birther like us. So what? I’ll still support him.
I’m not a one issue person. Mark has been there in the trenches for us like Rush so he deserves the props, regardless if he’s a birther or not.
And that’s why Levin comes across as a petulant whiner who will be relegated to the crap timeslots as long as his radio show remains on the air.
Who cares if he is not a birther. He does plenty to combat Obummer on all types of other fronts. If someone wants to dismiss things it is a free country.
Mark was mainly POed at Trump wanting to run as an independent and handing the potus to the dems. He has a point but the elegibility issue and cover up are also a big deal. If BOzo is not eligible than why should we respect the law.
The information in a COLB is, as a practical matter, meaningless.
The reason is that there are three (3) levels of information at least in the HI birth records, including original registraation info, the INDEX of data extracted, and the info requested and issued in a COLB.
There are multiple and myriad ways that the original registration information may have been filed. From a standard hospital birth affirmation, to legally allowed “late registrations” “registrations of foreign born children of Hawaii citizens” amendments and alterations of existing birth records, including to modify the existing record for ADOPTION which may include changing the fathers name on the original record. In consequence of many of these variations, the original records may be SEALED and not thereafter subject to review at all. Information on the COLB from the INDEX may not match in many instances the original registration information. Some original registrations do not require any third party verification but may be made on statement by a parent or other applying person, and if at all may be based on nothing other than a family bible entry.
But the most intriquing example of how a birth registration may have been made in Hawaii prior to 1972, is via a late birth registration (subject to later change or amendment) which at that time could be made solely at the discretion of the director of health on affidavit of a parent, possible without any other confirming information. See: Hawaii code of regulations Public Health Regulations Chapter 8 former section 14. “Delayed Birth Registration” (”..additional evidence MAY be required”).
Whatever statutory legal presumptions may apply to a COLB under Hawaii law the simple truth is that due to the wide variety of manner and circumstances of registration, past lax evidentiary standards, potential for amendment and alteration such as by adoption, potential sealing of original records..and a COLB based only on Indexed data reflecting the revisions and nothing else.
A significant factor in continuing doubt as to Obama’s progeny is the unusual circumstance of no physician or hospital taking credit or being unequivocally named by Obama as his birthplace.
Levin of course even wrote a book about judicial activism and about how the left-wing democrats are intentionally trying to destroy our Constitution. I have always been a fan of his and had even called his show many times years ago. Met him once as well at a book signing.
It amazes me though how ignorant he is on this Constitutional issue. I guess the term ‘natural born citizen’ could mean anything at all to Levin.
He says that this issue gets us nowhere? How does an issue thst is strictly about trying to uphold the Constitution get us nowhere?
Ignoring the issue as Levin suggests gets another part of the Constitution trampled upon and voided.
I had to snap off the radio when I heard him starting that rant. I really could not stomach it, coming from him. It’s far too disappointing for me to hear him say it.
I just don’t get what goes through the minds of people in Levin’s position, when they make statements that run counter to the ideas of most of those who listen to them.
You’d think they’d never talked to the average man in the street, or a Tea Partier. On this issue, Mark Levin is out of the mainstream. If I were him, I would be a bit more gentle in explaining my position to my listeners, but Mark pretty much tore the subject up with that rant.
I think that was a mistake. My guess is, that most of his listeners care deeply about the subject, and want Obama to prove to us that he’s legally holding the office of president.
Continuing with this birther issue is like splitting 10’s in blackjack.
Levin’s entitled to his opinion.
And I’m entitled to mine.
My opinion is that the burden is on someone who wants to hold an office to prove that he meets the qualifications for the office.
The Fraud has not done that. We deserve to have the proof.
Regardless of what Levin says.
You can't hide something like that forever.
Trump ought to offer a million dollar reward to anybody who can come up with a bona fide copy.
There are enough alarming things in Obama’s past without worrying about a birth certificate.