Posted on 04/11/2011 10:10:04 AM PDT by DoctorBulldog
The Donald won.
Leni
Obama hasn’t had to present it as evidence. All of the cases have been booted on issues of ‘standing’ — you don’t have the right to question your POTUS. Who does?
Cost TEN BUCKS to get the long form certified:
http://www.bluegrasspundit.com/2011/04/why-does-press-goes-wild-because.html
Next time a Dem argues with you say, “Have you given money to the Democrat party? Then $2,000,000 — some of it yours — has gone to fight over a dozen cases rather then give up this $10 document to public scrutiny.
You should complain to your party that they are wasting money since Obama has nothing to hide.”
Yeah, I suppose that’s possible. However, refer back to the photo of the Birth Certificate I posted. It’s from the same year and hospital as Obama. No handwritten notes on it...
You know, now that I’m thinking about it, Butterdezillion had mentioned something a while back about indirect confirmation that Obama’s Birth Certificate had been amended...
Let me leave him a message and see if he could elaborate on that.
Cheers
I think she mentioned the “half handwritten” was to bridge the gap between Abercrombie’s statement that there was a recording of Obama’s birth “actually written down” in the archives and her own statement that there was an “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures”.
She’s trying to claim that whatever they’ve got is accurately described by both those statements so there is no discrepancy between what she said and what Abercrombie said.
The trouble, though, is that a normal birth certificate doesn’t have anything “written down” except the signatures.
In the end, their statements aren’t legal statements and they can say they meant just about anything. There’s no way for us to prove anything we suspect regarding what either Abercrombie or Fukino meant, but that just leaves us with questions and doubts - which is exactly how we got where we’re at - where 87% of those polled said Trump was right to ask for Obama to disclose his long-form BC.
My fear is that Fukino was actually talking about a forged long-form I believe they have in their office, using someone else’s BC#. Once Abercrombie got rid of Palafox and installed a shill who has made the HDOH even worse at transparency and lawfulness than it was under Fukino (how far into the negative numbers can they go?), they were able to add the forged long-form to their records and alter the computer records to show that BC# as being for Barack Hussein Obama II. Now they just need the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to let Orly get discovery of the long-form, they’ll produce the forged long-form, and all Obama’s troubles will be over on this issue.
Unless a state law somewhere either requires or allows access to the embedded transaction logs and complete vital records history that would show the tampering with the records.
Unless we pass such a state law, or a ballot initiative allowing any registered voter to challenge eligibility in court and get access to the transaction logs and complete vital records history... we will be sucker-punched when that forged long-form is produced.
Cheers!
Yeah, I’ve always worried that given enough time, Obama and his psychophants would forge a new Birth Certificate. It seems to me that the courts have now given him all the time in the world to take care of any inconsistencies with his birth records. Checkmate in 3...2...1...
However, he can’t deny that he was born with dual citizenship and has shown allegiance to his Kenyan side by meddling in the affairs of the Kenyan government and stumping for Odinga in 2006.
Since there is no firm agreement on exactly what the term Natural Born Citizen means, one needs to look at the original intent of the Framers of the Constitution.
Charles Pickney (one of the original signers of the U.S. Constitution) spoke on March 28, 1800 concerning the intent of the Presidential requirements as found in the U.S. Constitution:
“...and to insure experience and attachment to the country, they have determined that no man who is not a natural born citizen, or citizen at the adoption of the Constitution, of fourteen years residence, and thirty-five years of age, shall be eligible. . . .”
Therefore, because Obama was born with attachment to another country and has demonstrated said attachment, he is in violation of the original intent of the Natural Born Citizen clause and is therefore an illegitimate president.
Cheers
Can someone photoshop Obaama's face into this?
It needs a caption, too, like 'Office of the Lame Duck'.
Cheers!
Can someone photoshop Obaama's face into this?
It needs a caption, too, like 'Office of the Lame Duck'.
Cheers!
Cheers
Okay. I asked Butterdezillion about the evidence concerning an amendment to Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate. His reply is here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2703297/posts?page=45#45
Cheers
Whoever this kook is a picture 'similar' isn't enough. Show the one with Zero's name on it, whatever name he went by at the time.
Cheers!
******
Yes, Trump's investigators in Hawaii should press Fukino to explain in more detail what she meant by the 1/2 written, 1/2 typed remark when, according to the Nordyke twins birth certificate we see on the internet---the Nordyke twins were born the day after Obama at Kapiolani, if Obama was born at Kapiolani as he claims---every item is typed except for the signatures.
Glad I could help.
Cheers
can we find any thing from MSNBC where she said that??
It would be great to pit her word against Obama’s
Here’s the link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42519951/ns/politics-more_politics/
From the article at that link:
“She found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files.”
Cheers
thank you very much!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.