http://www.notablebiographies.com/images/uewb_07_img0509.jpg
I'd go with Uncle Frank before Elijah. It was FMD (aka Bob Greene) who taught young Barry how to be black (and red, at the same time).
Posted on 03/15/2011 6:49:19 AM PDT by chatter4
Great video. Who's Your Daddy? Obama-Who's Your Daddy? Jack Cashill reviews four of the possible fathers of Barack Hussein Obama on the Andrea Shea King show. There is a lot of information given which many may not have heard before.
IIRC the attorney in the divorce case also was counsel to the HI DNC and they would NOT put Soetoro on the HI ballots, apparently they knew the real truth of the B.C.!!!
Right. The DNC would never say what attorney approved the removal of the Constitutional eligibility language from the HDP’s 2008 Certification of Nomination, but the guy who had handled the HDP’s legal cases in all the cases that could be found on the web was the attorny for Obama’s mother in the Soetoro divorce.
Then add to this mix that then chief clerk of election 2008, Tim Adams’ sworn affidavit, that he was told by his superiors NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE EXIST IN HAWAII or could be found!!!
That's what I named her long ago. Aka orgasmic internet troll seeking pervert "satisfaction"!!!
http://www.notablebiographies.com/images/uewb_07_img0509.jpg
I'd go with Uncle Frank before Elijah. It was FMD (aka Bob Greene) who taught young Barry how to be black (and red, at the same time).
Google citation of Bob Greene's
book. With title and subtitle.
Sorry to report I feel even worse today. When I’m up to it, I’ll start posting some of the stuff I’ve got and I’ll ping you...probably this weekend.
you REALLY think there's a resemblance? I certainly don't.
Thanks, Fred Nerks. [Who's his mama?]
From # 136:
WHO WAS BORN ON JANUARY 8, 1961? FROM EQUATORIAL GUINEA?
AND WHY DOES THAT BIRTHDATE CORRESPOND WITH MARY'S BABYSITTING STORY?
-
Then, from # 144:
Stanley Armour KNEW who ANNA 0BAMA was. She’s there with the kenyan and Stanley Armour on the dock. They didn’t add all those fake lei for no reason. If that’s the kenyan she’s standing beside, they have their arms around each other.
Is she the same girl as ANNE/USA? Her image at the Nachmannofs is too distorted to tell.
But one thing is for certain: NEITHER OF THEM ARE IMAGES OF STANLEY ANN DUNHAM.
-
TOM FIFE POSTED HIS STORY ON FR:
no one took him seriously...(at the time)
Refreshing our memory, and trying to make sense out of deliberate confusion, check out Article and # 1 at this Link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2344042/posts
.
Yes, I am aware of the photo and its date written on it.
What is confusing is that, as the article points out, there is no record of Obama returning to Hawaii between 1967 and 1971. Nothing in the books he (or Ayers) has written, nothing in the released records to indicate any travel by Obama back to the US in 1969. He was supposed to be in Indonesia that entire time.
So I know this photo and story are out there and looks very true. It just does not fit any known/verified timeline of events.
These are pretty good photo samples for studying - for looking for resemblances and differences between Barry and the other three.
First to jump out: Barry has his mother’s large, plump earlobes, and both their lobes “hang free”. Lobes either hang free, or are smoothly connected to the skin in back of the jawline. It’s one or the other: Hanging free, or “attached”. If your lobes hang free and both your parents’ lobes are attached - one of them [or both] is not your parent.
Likely that under her hair, Stanley Ann’s ears are large and “free-ranging” like Barry’s.
Barry’s head shape is slightly of a long/narrow shape, but only slightly. There is more structural “weight” between the eyes and chin than between the eyes and hairline. Davis’ head shape is much the same as Barry’s. Stanley Ann’s isn’t - her head is heart-shaped: wide at the temples, sloping pretty sharply down to a narrow pointed chin. The distance between her lower lip and the point of her chin is much longer, proportionally, than is Barry’s. That prominent chin is a Dunham feature - very noticeable in her father. The prominent Dunham chin would be the countering factor to the small chins of both Davis and “Senior”, while the roundness of those small chins would have outweighed Stanley Ann’s ‘point’ going to her son. “Senior’s” head shape is nothing like Barry’s: It is square, with heavy round cheek bones. Unlike the heavy-weightedness below the eyes of Barry and Davis, Senior’s eyes are spaced evenly between the top of his head and the tip of his chin.
Noses: Stanley Ann’s is “pinched” and narrow; left nostril larger and lower than the right: noticeably lopsided. Barry’s right nostril is larger and lower than SA’s. Barry’s nose could be a blend of hers and either of the sire candidates: both of them have noses of average size and shape for their race. Theirs, however, both have a pleasing symetry missing in Barry’s and SA’a noses.
All of Senior’s head/facial bone structure is round and blocky, and he has the backward-sloping forehead typical of his Luo ancestry, as well as the hairline receding at an early age. It is believed that in this photo he is about 22-23 years old. Barry’s is at mid-40s; Davis’s - looks to be maybe 50 -55.
Where Senior’s forehead slopes backward, the foreheads of Barry and Davis go straight up from the brows, then “shelf-off” to very similar hairlines.
Eyes: SA’s have an “arch” shape, with a fairly large white area. Senior’s - though he is not smiling, his eyes are open only narrowly. His are also spaced widely apart by the nose bridge. “They” say that esthetically, the face is most appealing to observers if the space between the eyes will easily accomodate an eye - that is, the width of that space should be the same as the width of an eye. [Large eyes, widely spaced: think Jackie Kennedy]. Hard to tell with Davis because he’s not looking straight enough at the camera. Barry and SA: nope - neither makes it; part of what gives their faces that “pinched” appearance.
Mouths: Here we go. Just a glance says Senior isn’t even in the game: wide, full mouth and no mid-line “seam” on the upper lip. And look at the cleft between the lips and the nose! This contestant might just as well take his toys and go home. Uhhhhh. Oh, yeah...that’s exactly what he DID do.
Davis has extremely full lips/mouth. Stanley Ann has extremely narrow and pinched lips/mouth. Barry’s lips/mouth fall right in between those other two. The similarity is stunning - right down to the upper lip’s midline “seam”.
The most striking similarity between Barry and Davis shows prominently in the lower photo of Barry: Under their mouths, between the lower lip and the “top” of the chin there is a paunch - it may be fat, but appears more to be an unusual muscle structure, and it “cradles” the entire lower lip above the chin. I can’t recall seeing such a feature on anyone else, ever. Over the past few year, this feature on Barry has become increasingly prominent - almost to the point of distraction. It’s very obvious in this photo. It shows in this photo of Davis, but there are others where it’s very obvious. [Sorry I don’t know how to post photos; google Frank Marshall Davis, click on “images”, and they’ll show up]. To me, this shared wierd feature clinches the paternity issue - ALL things considered.
Eyebrows: SA’s have a high arch, but since women pluck, it’s hard to say. Barry’s and Davis’ eyebrows are very alike in shape and density. They also have the same frown crease. And, chillingly, they have that same icy death-stare. Look at them - cold, angry eyes with no highlights.
THE CHINNY CHIN CHIN! (but the daughter of Michelle and Zero has it...)
Just a chip off the old block, as we say In Oz.
the SON of Frank Marshall Davis:
Helen Canfield Davis and her husband Frank, had five children, four daughters and one son.
Thanks LucyT and Fred Nerks.
About Barry’s world travels when a child -
He returned to Hawaii in August 1971, summer, to live with his g’parents and, page 58 of “Dreams”, spoke of the summer drawing to a close, and of him being restless to start at Punahou.
On page 58 he also said: “I had gone for several interviews with Punahou’s admissions officer THE PREVIOUS SUMMER”. That would have been the summer of 1970.
That 1970 date is confirmed on page 54 of “Dreams”: Barry had just been picked up by Gramps and Toot at the Honolulu airport in August 1971 and he was fretting to himself that he would be living with strangers. Then he recalled that when his mother had told him he would be returning to Hawaii, and that she would try to make it there for Christmas...”She reminded me of what a great time I’d had living with Gramps and Toot just the previous summer - the ice cream, the cartoons, the days at the beach.”
The “previous summer” was 1970. So his 1971 return to Hawaii was not his only trip away from Indonesia. He was not there non-stop between Oct. 1967 and Aug. 1971.
Considering that photo labeled ‘3rd grade 1969’ of Barry and Scott Inoue, we have to wonder just how long the “previous summer” might have actually been.
The photo of the two boys - it disputes Scott’s [and his mother’s?] memories, but it looks as though “Scott”... “1969” was written with a different pen than “Barry”...”3rd grade”. As if originally all is had was “Scott” at the left side of the photo and “1969” at the right side - that “Barry 3rd grade” was added later with a different pen. “Later” could have been the next day - or say even 40 years later, after the import of the photo was realized.
Not criticizing a little kid’s vague memories, or his mom’s. Just pondering...just sayin’.
Regardless of when names/dates were written - that photo is proof, along with Barry’s own words in “Dreams”, that he did indeed travel away from Indonesia before moving to Hawaii in 1971. Do you suppose he was in Hawaii with the g’parents for all or part of his third grade year as a test-run in consideration of the permanent move? At this point it surely can’t be ruled out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
