doesn't resemble him at all!
Posted on 03/15/2011 6:49:19 AM PDT by chatter4
Great video. Who's Your Daddy? Obama-Who's Your Daddy? Jack Cashill reviews four of the possible fathers of Barack Hussein Obama on the Andrea Shea King show. There is a lot of information given which many may not have heard before.
Now, there you go again, playing your silly games and trying to distort the facts!
You know that the most consistently accurate polling comes from Rasmussen!
Of the 57% of likely voters who disapprove of 0bama’s performance, 42% STRONGLY disapprove.
Guess what? There is a new poll from Rasmussen which finds that 11% of likely U.S. voters think communism is morally superior to the U.S. system of politics and economics, 13% are not sure. This certainly explains the 20% who strongly approve of 0bama. Is that why jamese777 continues to lie for him?
anything is possible, as I have stated before, the grandfather might have sent the real mother and Ann to Kenya to make the sham marrage to Obama Sr. look legit. The grandparents registered his birth with Hawaiian records. Later obama’s mother “gave” obama a SS number of a retired man who died in Hawaii(he was from Conn.)she had access to SS numbers of people who had died in Hawaii. obama later used some of these numbers to get benifits while going to college. Without the sealed records of obama, this can not of course be proven. Just a theory until proven otherwise.
If my theory is incorrect, obama could release all his records and prove me wrong!!!
doesn't resemble him at all!
Pinging Again.
. . . . Really, really need to begin at # 76 and read to end of the thread.
(Photos on both pages.)
[Thanks, all.]
As petite as SAD was, did anybody like UberCommie ever notice any signs of pregnancy?
That makes sense.
The Soetoro / Dunham divorce document still refer to a child over 18 (with no name). It has been assumed that is Obama II.
And if that is the case it would not fit with my theory that he legal guardianship and citizenship changed in 1971. But something seems strange about that period. And I just do not see grandparents taking on a child that is not cleaning within their guardianship and has clean citizenship. I hate to use the analogy but someone like taking ownership of car without a clean title.
But the name issue would also fit the amended BC around 2006/2007 period - to ‘fix’ this in Hawaii. I think what ever the original Hawaii records were and regardless of the ‘real facts’ they said he was born in Hawaii, even if was Washington or BC. I am not even throwing Kenya in the mix. That is just an adopted story by him to give him that tie in to his father name sake. Probably something he wanted to do if Lolo tossed him out.
So the question is. Did millions of people vote for a legal person or not in 2008? Sounds like they did only if they wrote in ‘Barry Soetoro’.
The answer is: NOBODY!
You have to take into account that when the kenyan was interviewed in May, 1962, he said he had not been back to Kenya FOR SEVEN YEARS!
He probably brought ANNA OBAMA with him from the mainland:
I WISH freepers would STOP identifying ANNE/USA as ASIAN. She might just be squinting!
The image at the Nachmannofs is too distorted to be conclusive.
What a great post!
'Pat'ernal (from/of the Father);'Mat'ernal(from/of the Mother)
Yes, we are patriots!
We are fighting for what our Fathers... Fathers who were American citizens when we were born... have bequeathed us.
How could one who is NOT a Patriot even be CONSIDERED for the Presidency?
STE=Q
Unfortunately my son has gone through two divorces with minor children, and my daughter one divorce with minor children. The childrens birth certificates were never a part of the divorce record. You just name the minor children and their birth dates.
I already knew that, troll. The fact remains that you have have distorted the more accurate data by admittedly mixing in the inaccurate polling data. So now answer the question.
The data for this chart come from the Real Clear Politics summary on 12 November 2008.
Poll Obama McCain Spread Off by
Rasmussen Reports 52 46 6 0.5
Pew 52 46 6 0.5
GWU/Battleground 50 44 6 0.5
Ipsos/McClatchy 53 46 7 0.5
CNN/Opinion Research 53 46 7 0.5
Fox News 50 43 7 0.5
Diageo/Hotline 50 45 5 1.5
NBC News / Wall St. Journal 51 43 8 1.5
Gallup Traditional 51 43 8 1.5
IBD/TIPP 52 44 8 1.5
Marist 52 43 9 2.5
ABC News / Wash Post 53 44 9 2.5
Gallup Expanded 52 43 9 2.5
CBS News / NYT 51 42 9 2.5
Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 54 43 11 4.5
Your experience may apply here, and it may not. How long ago, and where, did your son and daughter go to court to settle their respective domestic affairs?
The question is what was required in Hawaii in the mid-1960s.
In those poses there was not much resemblence. I think the pictures that led me to my conclusion were of the toddler Obama. Who knows. One thing is certain; the man is a mystery.
Interesting how this troll changed the subject from “Who’s Your Daddy?” to polls. I wonder what all his asinine posts have to do with research. ;-)
Don’t you think Obama looks like his grandfather in the picture in your post?
Good Heavens! I hope there are no more "NBC American" 0b0z0s floating around to inhert the US!
It's the media, the number one enemy of the US, that will pay dearly when things go bunkers around here.
California and Washington. 1970-80-90.
After seeing what lawyers charge for divorces I helped them with a do it yourself divorce. You can get all the paper work and instructions online. There is one paper that is confidential and that is if you also have a restraining order against the other party. This is kept out of the public divorce file.
I might be able to provide a clue...if the only bc he had to provide him with an ID belonged to the child of the kenyan and Anna Obama, that document would have shown a brithdate in January, 1961. That date did, in itself not provide a problem at the time, but what WOULD HAVE BEEN A PROBLEM is that the document showed the mother’s MAIDEN NAME - and it wasn’t Stanley Ann Dunham.
That’s when the ‘South Australian’ birth certificate became the template for the forgery presented with the divorce document.
The secretary of the Australian Law Society was LAVENDER and Monash University in Melbourne, Australia had a student exchange program with Harvard University. The Australian Law Society was modelled on the Harvard counterpart.
The kenyan was apparently at Harvard at the time. If anyone ever wondered about the background to the ‘BOMFORD’ forgery, there’s your answer.
It was dated to suit the requirements for the ‘fantasy divorce’ - no court was going to give custody to Stanley Ann Dunham unless she was shown as THE MOTHER.
The Bomford document, as a template for the forgery established both a new birthdate and changed the name of the mother.
Can I prove it? No. Not any more than anyone else can prove Stanley Ann Dunham gave birth to a child in August 1961.
I noticed...he can’t address the research, because it’s not in his script, so all he can do is try to create a diversion, poor thing...
We need to do a Poll of our own. Do we continue to tolerate it or have it removed for SPAM?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.