Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky

Your experience may apply here, and it may not. How long ago, and where, did your son and daughter go to court to settle their respective domestic affairs?

The question is what was required in Hawaii in the mid-1960s.


112 posted on 03/16/2011 3:32:44 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Jedidah
"How long ago, and where, did your son and daughter go to court to settle their respective domestic affairs?"

California and Washington. 1970-80-90.

After seeing what lawyers charge for divorces I helped them with a do it yourself divorce. You can get all the paper work and instructions online. There is one paper that is confidential and that is if you also have a restraining order against the other party. This is kept out of the public divorce file.

118 posted on 03/16/2011 3:54:00 PM PDT by Spunky (Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah

I might be able to provide a clue...if the only bc he had to provide him with an ID belonged to the child of the kenyan and Anna Obama, that document would have shown a brithdate in January, 1961. That date did, in itself not provide a problem at the time, but what WOULD HAVE BEEN A PROBLEM is that the document showed the mother’s MAIDEN NAME - and it wasn’t Stanley Ann Dunham.

That’s when the ‘South Australian’ birth certificate became the template for the forgery presented with the divorce document.

The secretary of the Australian Law Society was LAVENDER and Monash University in Melbourne, Australia had a student exchange program with Harvard University. The Australian Law Society was modelled on the Harvard counterpart.

The kenyan was apparently at Harvard at the time. If anyone ever wondered about the background to the ‘BOMFORD’ forgery, there’s your answer.

It was dated to suit the requirements for the ‘fantasy divorce’ - no court was going to give custody to Stanley Ann Dunham unless she was shown as THE MOTHER.

The Bomford document, as a template for the forgery established both a new birthdate and changed the name of the mother.

Can I prove it? No. Not any more than anyone else can prove Stanley Ann Dunham gave birth to a child in August 1961.


119 posted on 03/16/2011 3:55:32 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson