Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin clarifies statement on Supreme Court ruling: ‘I wasn’t calling for any limit..'
Dailey Caller ^ | Thursday March 3, 2011

Posted on 03/03/2011 8:29:20 PM PST by Bigtigermike

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin clarified remarks posted on Twitter this week in response to a Supreme Court ruling in favor of a church that demonstrates at military funerals, saying she was making a point about a double standard on free speech, not that the group shouldn’t have the right to protest.

Her quote was interpreted by many news outlets, including The Daily Caller, to mean that she disagreed with the Supreme Court’s ruling, although in a new statement exclusive to TheDC, Palin said she agreed with the ruling in favor of the church.

“Obviously my comment meant that when we’re told we can’t say ‘God bless you’ in graduation speeches or pray before a local football game but these wackos can invoke God’s name in their hate speech while picketing our military funerals, it shows ridiculous inconsistency,” Palin told TheDC. “I wasn’t calling for any limit on free speech, and it’s a shame some folks tried to twist my comment in that way. I was simply pointing out the irony of an often selective interpretation of free speech rights.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister
KEYWORDS: freepressforpalin; palin; sarahpalin; scotuswasright; supremecourt; toolittletoolate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-174 next last
To: Bigtigermike

Anyone with an IQ above room temperature knew what she meant in the first place.


101 posted on 03/04/2011 4:11:22 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
It seems to me that both Palin and 0 can't keep their pie holes shut and wind up walking back most of what they say.
102 posted on 03/04/2011 4:15:34 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

.....which is why we Freepers need to bind together for a Draft DeMint movement.


103 posted on 03/04/2011 4:15:56 AM PST by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: diverteach

Defending Palin is exempt from the rules does not count./s


104 posted on 03/04/2011 4:18:53 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I like to see you choke on you words pissy


105 posted on 03/04/2011 4:28:39 AM PST by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (High time to bring back the sons (and daughters) of liberty!!!! SP4P2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I love Sarah, want her to be our next president, but I don’t like her commenting on complex issues, such as this decision, with a tweet that necessarily reads like a text message from Willow. In that tweet, she actually expressly criticized this decision as lacking in common sense and decency. She didn’t say that this difficult but correct decision highlights how wrong the extremity of the Court’s interpretation of the establishment clause.


106 posted on 03/04/2011 4:35:15 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
And besides, saying “I side with the church on this one” sounds foolish too. With this ruling, the USSC made hate speech protected speech.

OMG, are you suggesting that the government has the right or the obligation to BAN hate speech???????

What forum do you think you are posting on??

107 posted on 03/04/2011 4:44:30 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Has anyone ever misunderstood one of your posts on this forum? If so was it your fault or theirs?


108 posted on 03/04/2011 4:46:31 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Yes-here in America we are now more like the soviet Communist —than we are like America. The God Hates Fags cult knows so long as they are not directly protesting our Govt. just really pizzin off the peons they can do their circus.So long as they do not protest any State funerals or functions so long as they dont do their Thang outside the Lincoln Memorial ,or the
Jefferson Memorial nor outside the US supreme Court building—so long as the govt. can present out capitol as peaceful and drab except for the occasional bare chested lesbians-or made for tv bust of some minor Republican politician the God Hates Fags cult can do what it pleases.


109 posted on 03/04/2011 5:01:26 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
-"What a shame for some on here!"

They are diluted in disliking (and hating) Palin as much as the radical libtards. It 'is' a shame!

They dislike Palin so much, that it clouds their objective reasoning. Just like it does to the libtards.

110 posted on 03/04/2011 5:42:05 AM PST by LibFreeUSA (Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Palin is a living breathing gaffe machine.

And so is Mark levin?

111 posted on 03/04/2011 5:58:07 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
.....which is why we Freepers need to bind together for a Draft DeMint movement.

It ain't happening. Get over it.

112 posted on 03/04/2011 5:58:53 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

She say it..,,,,,”but we cant invoke Gods name in The public square”

I knew exactly what she meant and said so yesterday but many anti-Palin people which includes the Media twisted her words - remember her LI Q&A session when she mentioned breastfeeding, the media went wild over that, and took it completely out of context. Remember her post Tucson video, that was taken completely out of context as well. Matter of fact, I can’t think of any speech, interview, Facebook post, or tweet that hasn’t been distorted.

That’s the way of the Media and we can’t allow FR trolls and Ron Paul supporters to lie about something to dictate what she meant about it


113 posted on 03/04/2011 6:03:23 AM PST by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Alito has it right, Levin has it right.

Palin has it half right. Hey I don’t agree with everything Palin says and does, but she is still the best conservative for the job of President.


114 posted on 03/04/2011 6:54:03 AM PST by rbmillerjr (I will not, under any circumstances, vote for Mitt Romney....none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

The media got it wrong? Now THERE’S something new under the sun.


115 posted on 03/04/2011 6:55:33 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown
That’s where I disagree. Bush NEVER set the record straight and the other side walked all over him. Palin has a screwdriver-in-the-back way of answering critics that I applaud.

Remember her 57 States Facebook post? She inserted half a dozen or more mis-statements and flubs made by Obama that the media never reported on while they highlighted her saying "North" instead of "South" in an audio where she used the correct terms as well.

The commenters and I think some in the media made fun of what she said and called her an idiot for saying such things when she even pointed out that she was quoting Obama!

They missed the point entirely. But Sarah made her point quite well with humor.

A velvet glove concealing an iron fist.

116 posted on 03/04/2011 6:59:43 AM PST by PowerPro (Conservative Revolution Reborn! Palin/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Since her comments were so wildly misrepresented by frauds, it was wise to clear up what she said and meant. Most non PDSers read what she tweeted and UNDERSTOOD exactly what she meant.
117 posted on 03/04/2011 7:13:38 AM PST by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
That has been my contention all along. Palin is a living breathing gaffe machine.

Prove it with examples in context.

Then count the number of examples against the number of statements she has made since the end of the 2008 campaign.

Another ignorant statement by another PDS'er.
118 posted on 03/04/2011 7:44:00 AM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
"...i said yesterday she was talking about the inconsistencies and double standards of court rulings and i was laughed at!"

The Alinskyites, O'Bunghole Moles, and chicken-sh*t Lefty Trolls (who haunt here without the sac required to announce their true allegiences) understand that ridiculing something you can't defeat goes a long way toward neutralizing its potency. Sadly, many PDS "conservatives" have adopted these same filthy, rancid tactics in assailing Sarah because, absent the deception inherent in that ploy, they have nothing else they could rationally hold against her.

When they ridicule and laugh at you, just smile a little smile to yourself... because in fact, all they have actually just done... is admitted that you were right.

;-)

119 posted on 03/04/2011 7:57:51 AM PST by Gargantua (Palin ~ Cain 2012... Demand Exceptional--America deserves the best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
If you have to come back to explain what you meant the first time then you have screwed up.

This chick is making a career out of..."this is what I really meant".

120 posted on 03/04/2011 8:01:42 AM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson