Skip to comments.
Weather Control (Rain On Demand) in Abu Dhabi?
UK Daily Mail ^
| 1/3/2011
| na
Posted on 01/03/2011 9:09:54 AM PST by Yak
For centuries people living in the Middle East have dreamed of turning the sandy desert into land fit for growing crops with fresh water on tap. Now that holy grail is a step closer after scientists employed by the ruler of Abu Dhabi claim to have generated a series of downpours. Fifty rainstorms were created last year in the state's eastern Al Ain region using technology designed to control the weather.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Agriculture; Business/Economy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: dubai; rain; uae; weathercontrol
This could be astounding if true. Very clever approach (again, if true).
1
posted on
01/03/2011 9:10:02 AM PST
by
Yak
To: Yak
And exactly whose water are they stealing?
If they make it rain in the desert, then it won’t rain somewhere else where it may be needed for someone elses agriculture.
2
posted on
01/03/2011 9:14:27 AM PST
by
BuffaloJack
(The Recession is officially over. We are now into Obama's Depression.)
To: Yak
Fairly obviously more rain in location A means less rain somewhere elsed.
To: Yak
I don’t know the truth of this, but I do know if you screw around enough with Mother Nature, somebody is going to get bitten.
4
posted on
01/03/2011 9:16:08 AM PST
by
Venturer
To: Yak
But, but what about the poor drowning desert animals and plants!
Ok, so we have X amount of water to go around, right? So, are they destroying another eco system?
5
posted on
01/03/2011 9:17:27 AM PST
by
bgill
(K Parliament- how could a young man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
To: Yak
Awesome GLOBULL WARMING AND COOLING AND RAIN AND SNOW ON DEMAND bitchen man cool S/
6
posted on
01/03/2011 9:20:17 AM PST
by
Tigen
(I shall raise you one .)
To: Yak
I’m sure there’ll be no unintended consequences from this.
7
posted on
01/03/2011 9:22:31 AM PST
by
DManA
To: bgill
I'm not a weather expert but I'm not so sure . . . according to the article: Over four summer months the emitters were switched on when the required atmospheric level of humidity reached 30 per cent or more.
If this device is just condensing the local ambient humidity present near this (or any?) ocean coast, would it only come at the low cost of just making the local air less humid just for a short while, until the humidity is soon replaced the the neighboring ocean again? If the source is the neighboring ocean would it really be "stealing" somebody else's rain, in this case?
In either case, I bet those huge ionizers would create one heckuva a lightning show.
8
posted on
01/03/2011 9:30:21 AM PST
by
Yak
To: Yak
Per the article, there has to be at least 30% humidity for it to work. I think it will be limited to coastal areas, where there is a chance of getting that much moisture....so I don’t think its really ‘stealing’ somebody else’s rainfall.
I am skeptical that it could ever reach a useable scale, though. The article didn’t mention how much rain, or how large the clouds were...but I bet they were pretty small, when one considers the needs of agriculture.
Interesting...but workable?
9
posted on
01/03/2011 9:34:40 AM PST
by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: Yak
If the source is the neighboring ocean would it really be "stealing" somebody else's rain, in this case?Ok, then, poor fishies are being deprived of their water!!!
So, what happens with the salt? If they're stealing water from the ocean, then at some point that should compensate for the melting glaciers so we won't have to worry about world-wide floods in 2012.
10
posted on
01/03/2011 9:36:30 AM PST
by
bgill
(K Parliament- how could a young man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
To: lacrew
Good point on the scale of this, LACrew, vs. the needs of agriculture.
However, even if it were limited to coastal areas, it could have a great impact if it were indeed scaleable. Think of rainfall in the several oceanside desert areas in the world . . . Somalia, Sudan & Ethopia come to mind. Perhaps Israel & the rest of the Mid-East, Western Australia, and Peru/Chile as well.
The African countries already have more than their share of challenges but this could concieveable help more land become farmable. Then people will fight wars over that newly fertile land . . . nevermind.
11
posted on
01/03/2011 9:49:52 AM PST
by
Yak
To: lacrew
Probably stealing rain that would have fallen in the ocean...
12
posted on
01/03/2011 10:09:15 AM PST
by
statered
("And you know what I mean.")
To: JoeProBono
13
posted on
01/04/2011 6:39:30 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...
14
posted on
01/04/2011 6:39:44 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson