Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officer won't sign order for troop indoctrination
WND ^ | December 24, 2010 | Brian Fitzpatrick

Posted on 12/28/2010 11:48:36 AM PST by Michael Barnes

An Army lieutenant colonel has asked to be relieved of command rather than order his troops to go through pro-homosexual indoctrination following the repeal of the policy, which required homosexuals to keep silent about their sexual preference. Currently the commander of a battalion-sized unit in the Army National Guard, the officer also has threatened to resign his commission rather than undergo "behavior modification" training intended to counter his religious convictions about homosexuality.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: ageda; behaviormodification; homoindoctrination; homosexualagenda; military; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: All

What happens the first time a (straight) NCO orders a subordinate to do an extremely dangerous task and the sub refuses, claiming the NCO is discriminating against him/her because he/she is gay and the NCO is straight???


21 posted on 12/28/2010 1:00:08 PM PST by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Boonie
I’m not too sure how well a bunch of armed fags would stand up against a bunch of good ole boys raised with rifles and shotguns in the south, mideast, southwest, and high west...

I too was raised with a gun in my hand from the time I could walk but our armed forces have so many high tech weapons (some of which I helped develop) that directly shooting at us and engaging in man to man combat will be the last thing they do.

Since they, and many here on FR think that an individual does not, and should not, own AT and AA missiles or machine guns then we have already lost most of the war against their Communism. Our founding fathers did not write in restrictions as to what types of weapons we could have, not because they only knew about muskets and such, but because they knew that we needed to be armed with the necessary equipment to keep a corrupt government at bay.

22 posted on 12/28/2010 1:31:05 PM PST by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

as a response to Mike Mullen and a policy submit or quit—
Farah suggested en masse reduction in the ranks-quitting.
Col.Dave Lapan of the DOD press.A Marine said the Military is a maritocracy (That those who merit retention are kept- those lacking merit are forced out)How any could be so
delusional as to suggest homosexuals merit being kept on
active duty defies logic With all due respect Col Lapan
“Don’t mean nothin!”


23 posted on 12/28/2010 1:45:58 PM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

The question remains is the conscience of those who supported this is not it evidence their conscious has been seared?


24 posted on 12/28/2010 1:49:05 PM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

I recall a story about a certain Helicopter pilot who told his superior that he was a Christian and felt uneasy about the change to allow women serve in combat.He was ofrced out. He never disobeyed any order-merely sought ht e advice o fhis superior -and was told he no longer fit with th e direction or goal of our post modern Military.


25 posted on 12/28/2010 1:53:03 PM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer
...but our armed forces have so many high tech weapons (some of which I helped develop) that directly shooting at us and engaging in man to man combat will be the last thing they do.

Call me crazy but I think leveling an urban neighborhood with a C-130 or an A-10 Warthog in order to root out the "redneck" living on the cul-de-sac will be a bad PR move.

26 posted on 12/28/2010 2:02:41 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

I would like to know how the DoD is going to define “openly gay.”

Think about it.


27 posted on 12/28/2010 3:09:59 PM PST by fightinJAG (Americans: the only people in the world protesting AGAINST government "benefits.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes
...the officer also has threatened to resign his commission rather than undergo "behavior modification" training...

Uhhhhhh....wait a minute....the OFFICER has to undergo "behavior modification" training???

What....the.....

28 posted on 12/28/2010 3:14:01 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Typical of perverts. To want to force your bs on others. Sooner or later the world will wake up to these perverted homosexuals.


29 posted on 12/29/2010 8:22:53 AM PST by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson