Skip to comments.
Plasma space-drive aces efficiency numbers: Set for ISS in 2014
The Register ^
| 11/25/10
| Lewis Page
Posted on 11/26/2010 4:45:23 PM PST by KevinDavis
Top boffins working at a NASA spinoff company are thrilled to announce that their plasma drive technology potentially capable of revolutionising space travel beyond the Earth's atmosphere has checked out A-OK in ground tests.
(Excerpt) Read more at theregister.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Astronomy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: space
Good Show!!
To: LittleBillyInfidel; LucyT; HighWheeler; ChuckHam; Elderberry; ColdOne; Tolkien; FreedomPoster; ...
2
posted on
11/26/2010 4:48:25 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(I have no problem with a black president. But the one we have now is yellow to the core)
To: KevinDavis
“Firstly it requires a plentiful supply of electricity to convert argon into plasma and expel it with such terrific violence.”
This is actually the biggest problem with it. They will need to vastly improve the efficiency of nuclear power generators to make it work. But that may not be impossible.
3
posted on
11/26/2010 4:49:24 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: Brilliant
They will need to vastly improve the efficiency of nuclear power generators to make it work. But that may not be impossible. Di-lithium crystals.
4
posted on
11/26/2010 5:02:00 PM PST
by
FatherofFive
(Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
To: KevinDavis
Pretty interesting stuff.
5
posted on
11/26/2010 5:05:12 PM PST
by
infidel29
(Since 0bama is NOT a uniter, can we change the acronym to just plain P.O.S.?)
To: Brilliant
6
posted on
11/26/2010 5:07:40 PM PST
by
Vaquero
(Dont pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: KevinDavis
I would submit that the particular spacecraft depicted here is going nowhere ....
7
posted on
11/26/2010 5:13:27 PM PST
by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: Brilliant
8
posted on
11/26/2010 5:39:07 PM PST
by
dangerdoc
(see post #6)
To: KevinDavis
Interesting, but nowhere near powerful enough, at least not yet.
9
posted on
11/26/2010 5:51:34 PM PST
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts!!)
To: Brilliant
This is actually the biggest problem with it. They will need to vastly improve the efficiency of nuclear power generators to make it work. But that may not be impossible. It's just a scaling problem - if they just use a regular fission reactor connected to a reverse-engineered ET anti-gravity generator, they can make the reactor big enough to support both the required platform size and the plasma engine thrust requirements.
Slap on some black anti-radar panels, and they're in business.


10
posted on
11/26/2010 6:17:43 PM PST
by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
To: Talisker
11
posted on
11/26/2010 6:52:37 PM PST
by
Nateman
(If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
To: FatherofFive

"Ion powerrh!"
12
posted on
11/26/2010 7:06:08 PM PST
by
mikrofon
(RIP, Mr. Doohan)
To: KevinDavis
Eh?
Hullo, Hullo, Hullo?
It was the Boffins, Wot?
13
posted on
11/26/2010 7:10:27 PM PST
by
MindBender26
(Fighting the "con" in Conservatism on FR since 1998.)
To: KevinDavis
Please add me to your space ping list.
14
posted on
11/27/2010 12:37:50 AM PST
by
Kevmo
(Has Obama resigned yet?)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson