To: KevinDavis
“Firstly it requires a plentiful supply of electricity to convert argon into plasma and expel it with such terrific violence.”
This is actually the biggest problem with it. They will need to vastly improve the efficiency of nuclear power generators to make it work. But that may not be impossible.
3 posted on
11/26/2010 4:49:24 PM PST by
Brilliant
To: Brilliant
They will need to vastly improve the efficiency of nuclear power generators to make it work. But that may not be impossible. Di-lithium crystals.
4 posted on
11/26/2010 5:02:00 PM PST by
FatherofFive
(Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
To: Brilliant
6 posted on
11/26/2010 5:07:40 PM PST by
Vaquero
(Dont pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Brilliant
8 posted on
11/26/2010 5:39:07 PM PST by
dangerdoc
(see post #6)
To: Brilliant
This is actually the biggest problem with it. They will need to vastly improve the efficiency of nuclear power generators to make it work. But that may not be impossible. It's just a scaling problem - if they just use a regular fission reactor connected to a reverse-engineered ET anti-gravity generator, they can make the reactor big enough to support both the required platform size and the plasma engine thrust requirements.
Slap on some black anti-radar panels, and they're in business.



10 posted on
11/26/2010 6:17:43 PM PST by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson