Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government Agents Seize Oath Keeper's New Born From Hospital (possible hoax)
Youtube ^ | 10/7/10 | george4title

Posted on 10/07/2010 7:04:28 PM PDT by Teflonic

Government Agents Seize Oath Keeper's New Born From Hospital New Hampshire, Wed. Oct. 6th, 2010

Last Night John Irish & Stephanie Janvrin had their new born baby girl taken away by government officials because of their involvement with Oath Keepers, a non violent constitutional organization. According to Irish, The Director of Security and the Head Nurse of the Hospital said "we want the pediatrician to check the baby in the nursery so that you can go home." The baby was wheeled out in the bassinet under the protest of Irish. Irish followed them out and took note of 3-4 men wearing suits with detective badges as well as 3 police officers.

The Division of Family Child Services proceeded to pat down John and inform the parents they would be taking the daughter. "They Stole our Child" says John Irish. An Affidavit was produced that claimed an affiliation with a militia called Oath Keepers. Irish claims Oath Keepers is a non violent organization. John and Stephanie were able to spend a few minutes with their daughter and were forced to leave. A security officer escorted the two out of the hospital.

George Hemminger george4title(AT)yahoo.com

More Info:

Facebook info

URGENT! ~ OATHKEEPERS ALERT! Request For Help! Please Read Attached Picture Then, If you can help. Please contact Watchman Noyes http://www.facebook.com/kan75 or his group page http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid... Citizens Against Government Tyranny

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?i... Stephanie Janvrin (the mother)

New Hampshire John Irish (father) http://americanlibertyriders.ning.com...

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/

Comment From John Janvrin6228 26 minutes ago 3 This has been flagged as spam hide This is Johnathon Irish, Brothers and Sisters, thank you for all of your support. janvrin6228@gmail.com is my personal email address if needed. Thank you all again for your support, if so needed I will send you our cell number just email me. I don't know what else to say right now, these bastards stole my daughter and she wasn't even 24 hours old. She was born at 2337 last night. I only have a few pictures of my baby girl, I can't even cry I am so pissed.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2littleinformaiton; 666; cheyenneirish; oathkeepers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

followup


61 posted on 10/07/2010 9:01:45 PM PDT by ArmyTeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

bttt


62 posted on 10/07/2010 9:04:27 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ArmyTeach
The frightening - and sad - thing as we track this story is not that we suspect that it may be hoax, but that in this political environment we entertain the possibility that it might be true ...
63 posted on 10/07/2010 9:08:50 PM PDT by ArmyTeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

Not verified there either.


64 posted on 10/07/2010 9:13:26 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ('“Our own government has become our enemy' - Sheriff Paul Babeu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

This should be interesting...


65 posted on 10/07/2010 9:14:32 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs (To be determined...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Me

mark for follow up.


66 posted on 10/07/2010 9:22:02 PM PDT by buschbaby (Beware! Momma Bear on the prowl. Grrrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

http://americanlibertyriders.ning.com/profile/JohnCIrish?xg_source=activity

I found a website that appears to be his. I still am not believing this story or that it has anything to do with being a member of Oath Keepers! Something definitely doesn’t smell right with this....

Still waiting!


67 posted on 10/07/2010 9:25:54 PM PDT by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm

found another story at http://dailyteaparty.com/2010/10/08/alert-peaceful-oath-keepers-newborn-baby-seized-at-hospital/

They do quote the name of the person that signed the documents and she checks out as working where they claim.

“The affidavit said “… the Division became aware and confirmed that Mr. Irish associated with a militia known as the “Oath Keepers”…” It was in forms from the DHHS and DCYF and signed by “Child Protective Service Worker” Dana Bicford on October 7th at 11:57AM.”

http://admin.state.nh.us/directory/procSearch_internet.asp?lstDepts2=HHS:CHILDREN+AND+YOUTH

Still needs further verification though.

cheers


68 posted on 10/07/2010 10:17:15 PM PDT by Hypo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic
Link to statement with video Stewart has just now as of 7:45PM PST, spoken to the father and he is faxing documents to Stewart. We are establishing a legal defense fund. Once it is confirmed through documentation that the father's association with Oath Keepers was listed as a reason, even if among several reasons listed, for taking the child, we will actively pursue aggressive legal remedy and redress. We will assist in locating competent local legal counsel in New Hampshire and additional expert legal counsel from around the country in First Amendment and child custody law. Stewart, who has worked on several First Amendment cases in State and Federal court will also volunteer his services to assist in the case Pro Bono.

Here is Stewart's statement for now:

We are doing all we can to confirm and document this. But if is IS accurate, and a newborn child was ripped from her mother's arms because the parents were "associated" with Oath Keepers by simply being members of our online ning discussion forum, then this is a grave crossing of a very serious line, and is utterly intolerable. It cannot be done. It cannot be allowed to stand. If it is true, then I will do all in my power to stop it. We will pull out all the stops, every lawful means of seeing that this child is returned to her parents and that all persons responsible are held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. There can be no freedom of speech, no freedom of association, no freedom to even open your mouth and "speak truth to power," no freedom AT ALL, if your children can be black bagged and stolen from you because of your political speech and associations - because you simply dare to express your love of country, and dare to express your solidarity and fellowship with other citizens and with active duty and retired military and police who simply pledge to honor their oath and obey the Constitution. It was to prevent just such outrageous content based persecution of political dissidents that our First Amendment was written. If true, then this is as bad, and in fact worse, than any of the violations of liberty that our Declaration of Independence lists as the reasons for our forefathers taking up arms in our Revolution and for separating from England. We no longer have freedom at all if this is allowed to be done. And we will not let it stand.

Stewart Rhodes Founder of Oath Keepers

Stewart will post additional statements and info as this situation develops. Please be ready to flood the responsible parties with phone calls and emails to put public pressure on them in the court of public opinion.

69 posted on 10/07/2010 10:21:09 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

ping


70 posted on 10/07/2010 11:51:32 PM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc; All
UPDATE : 10/07/2010 10.53PM PST -- We have confirmed that the affidavit in support of the order to take the child from her parents states ,along with a long list of other assertions against both parents, that “The Division became aware and confirmed that Mr. Irish associated with a militia known as the Oath Keepers.” Yes, there are other, very serious allegations. Out of respect for the privacy of the parents, we will not publish the affidavit. We will leave that to Mr. Irish. But please do remember that allegations do not equal facts -- they are merely allegations (and in my experience as a criminal defense lawyer in small town Montana I saw many allegations that proved to be false).

But an even more fundamental point is that regardless of the other allegations, it is utterly unconstitutional for government agencies to list Mr. Irish’s association with Oath Keepers in an affidavit in support of a child abuse order to remove his daughter from his custody. Talk about chilling speech! If this is allowed to continue, it will chill the speech of not just Mr. Irish, but all Oath Keepers and it will serve as the camel under the tent for other associations being considered too risky for parents to dare. Thus, it serves to chill the speech of all of us, in any group we belong to that “officials” may not approve of. Don’t you dare associate with such and such group, or you could be on “the list” and then child protective services might come take your kids.

Note that there is no allegation that Oath Keepers is a criminal organization or that Mr. Irish, in the context of his association with Oath Keepers, is committing any crime. We are not advocating or planning imminent violence, which is the established line where free speech ends and criminal behavior begins (See Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), which, as Wikipedia notes, “held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless it is directed to inciting and likely to incite imminent lawless action. In particular, it overruled Ohio’s criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence.” We don’t even advocate that the current serving use violence of any kind, let alone imminent violence. We ask them to merely stand down.

Neither is Oath Keepers a militia, for that matter. However, EVEN IF WE WERE, that also would not be a valid reason to take someone’s child away. PRIVATE MILITIAS, JUST LIKE OTHER VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS, ARE NOT ILLEGAL, and it is not a crime to associate with them. To the contrary, we have an absolute right, won by the blood of patriots, and protected by our First Amendment, to freely associate with each other as we damn well please so long as we are not advocating or planning imminent violence or directly harming our children (and no, teaching them “thought crime” like “All men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,” or that those who swear an oath should keep it, does not count -- at least not yet). A parent associating with a militia is not engaged in child endangerment and is not evidence of child endangerment (despite the shrill screeching of people such as Mark Potock of the SPLC, who desperately wants it to be so). Just recently a Time Magazine article described how the reporter visited the happy home of a militia member and his family -- and those kids are still at home, where they belong, as is the case with many th0usands of children across this country who have parents who “associate” with private militias and all manner of other non-criminal groups. You had damn well better defend the rights of those parents to freely associate in their militias and keep their kids while doing so. You can bet that if you let such an association be listed as grounds for taking children from their parents that it won’t only be militia folks who have their rights violated. Homeschoolers, evangelical Christians, gun owners, etc. will also be on the hit list. Just wait. Remember Pastor Niemöller’s timeless warning: ..... snip .....

America! It's about

★ FREEDOM! ★

★ Estimated Value – PRICELESS! ★

71 posted on 10/08/2010 12:22:59 AM PDT by Neil E. Wright (An OATH is FOREVER OathKeeper III We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Vor Lady

Hey, check this out.


72 posted on 10/08/2010 6:55:25 AM PDT by LongElegantLegs (To be determined...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

Bump


73 posted on 10/08/2010 2:23:31 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

This is now going all over the internet. It’s at Sipsey Street and here: http://castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?p=1021988#post1021988


74 posted on 10/08/2010 5:02:35 PM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: LongElegantLegs

Thanks, been watching this. Hug your kiddos for me.


75 posted on 10/08/2010 7:14:32 PM PDT by Vor Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson