Skip to comments.
The Rove, O'Donnell Strategry (Shameless and Useless Vanity)
Vanity oh Vanity
Posted on 09/16/2010 9:46:36 AM PDT by mnehring
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Is Rove a weasel bastard or could he still be a magnificent bastard playing the game better than we think?
1
posted on
09/16/2010 9:46:40 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: mnehring
To: mnehring
Is Rove a weasel bastard or could he still be a magnificent bastard playing the game better than we think? I would be impressed if you were right, but I don't think that Rove is that clever a strategist. Nor do I think he is that bad at reading people - the words he chose would hurt O'Donnell with any voter who took him seriously.
3
posted on
09/16/2010 9:49:48 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: mnehring
Well, if it is the latter, it completely flopped, lol.
To: mnehring
No, Rove’s candidate for 12 could be running against Palin.
This is prob the beginning of a primary fight.
5
posted on
09/16/2010 9:49:51 AM PDT
by
roses of sharon
(I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
To: RummyChick
Is that Castle that Gollum-Reid is holding?
6
posted on
09/16/2010 9:50:09 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: mnehring
My first comment on this whole affair was long these lines -- although not nearly as thorough and well-written as your comment.
But I don't think so. I certainly think Rove is helping O'Donnell very much and making it likely that she will win. But I believe Rove is doing this by accident. I consider him a pure Republican establishment guy and I think he is the enemy.
7
posted on
09/16/2010 9:50:09 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Things will change after the revolution, but not before.)
To: roses of sharon
Bingo! The long, hairy but well-coiffed arm of Dirty-Tricks Romney?
To: mnehring
For the “magnificent bastard” tactic to be useful I’d think he’d have distanced himself with words not so useful to the ‘Rats
He was too personal and vicious and specific, and now his words will be used against O’Donnell during the next 7 weeks
I think you pose an intriguing possibility, but if that’s what he was up to he went way overboard
9
posted on
09/16/2010 9:52:17 AM PDT
by
Enchante
("The great enemy of clear language is insincerity." -- George Orwell --)
To: miss marmelstein
Well, if it is the latter, it completely flopped, lol. Did it? She went from polling behind by -25 to -11 in one day and she went from raising only $50K through the entire primary to almost $1Million in one day.
10
posted on
09/16/2010 9:52:47 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: mnehring
Is Rove a weasel bastard or could he still be a magnificent bastard playing the game better than we think?Rove is going to voluntarilly allow his reputation to be totally destroyed in the minds of most conservatives just to help out a politician he was actively trying to defeat not long before?
Sorry. I'm not buying that.
11
posted on
09/16/2010 9:52:50 AM PDT
by
Wissa
(Gone Galt)
To: mnehring
Coons. Reid said Coons was “my pet”.
To: mnehring
The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
Rove didn’t favor her, because he didn’t (doesn’t) think she can win.
13
posted on
09/16/2010 9:53:52 AM PDT
by
RangerM
(A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
To: RummyChick
14
posted on
09/16/2010 9:54:12 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: Enchante
He was too personal and vicious and specific, and now his words will be used against ODonnell during the next 7 weeks
Spot-on.
15
posted on
09/16/2010 9:54:51 AM PDT
by
TSgt
(And the war came.)
To: mnehring
That’s not the behavior of any political supporter or friend. That’s someone doing a dirty deed for a dirty professional purpose.
To: ClearCase_guy
But I don't think so. I certainly think Rove is helping O'Donnell very much and making it likely that she will win. But I believe Rove is doing this by accident. Given the fact that Christine O'Donnell's opponent is apparently a hard-core Marxist, it is truly incredible that Rove is doing all he can to make her lose.
To: mnehring
No, all I’m saying is - I don’t agree he did it on purpose. No one would blow up their career like that for one candidate. I watched the interview live (I’m sure you did too), it was a genuine meltdown.
To: mnehring
I'll let this serve as my answer ...
19
posted on
09/16/2010 10:00:20 AM PDT
by
Scythian
To: mnehring
The Democrats went off the deep end in the Bush years by deluding themselves into thinking that Rove was some sort of evil scheming genius, instead of a basic political operative. They seriously thought that Rove controlled the weather, for crying out loud.
I would humbly suggest we don't do the same. Rove said what he said because that's what he honestly believes.
What I don't think the Roves of the world are taking into account is the fact that Castle could have won and then pulled an Arlen Specter / Jim Jeffords and flat-out joined the Democrat party when the offers started pouring in.
Also, they're missing the larger point. If the Republicans don't want this sort of thing to happen again, they better start nominating people who would be more palatable to the tea partiers.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson