Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government Scientists Say Microbes Eating BP Oil Without Using Up Oxygen
Associated Press ^ | 9-7-2010 | AP

Posted on 09/10/2010 9:16:13 AM PDT by Olympiad Fisherman

WASHINGTON — Government scientists studying the BP disaster are reporting the best possible outcome: Microbes are consuming the oil in the Gulf without depleting the oxygen in the water and creating "dead zones" where fish cannot survive. Outside scientists said this so far vindicates the difficult and much-debated decision by BP and the government to use massive amounts of chemical dispersants deep underwater to break up the oil before it reached the surface.

Oxygen levels in some places where the BP oil spilled are down by 20 percent, but that is not nearly low enough to create dead zones, according to the 95-page report released Tuesday. In an unusual move, BP released 771,000 gallons of chemical dispersant about a mile deep, right at the spewing wellhead instead of on the surface, to break down the oil into tiny droplets ...

(Excerpt) Read more at lubbockonline.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bp; gulf; oil; oilspill

1 posted on 09/10/2010 9:16:14 AM PDT by Olympiad Fisherman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

We knew this when it happened. The Pres of BP told congress this was not the major event government tried to make it.

He was right and was beaten up for it by unknowing government hacks and un-educated media.


2 posted on 09/10/2010 9:20:36 AM PDT by edcoil (Man can do the most amazing things if they have the most amazing things to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

Bump.


3 posted on 09/10/2010 9:20:42 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (With God, Obama can't hurt us. Without God, George Washington couldn't save us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

So we’re not all going to die?

Pray for America


4 posted on 09/10/2010 9:24:43 AM PDT by bray (The Tea Party Manual: http://www.brayincandy.com/id239.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

I sensed that it would not be nearly the oil disaster that many people were assuming it was going to be. The oil was natural oil as it had yet to be refined, and it was a mile deep in the ocean. Plus Bjorn Lomborg said in his Skeptical Environmentalist book that even the beaches up in Alaska cleared up much quicker than many people could have imagined during the Exxon Valdez spill. He also pointed out that clean up crews purposefully left alone a few areas to see what would happen. Those particular areas recovered much quicker than the areas they cleaned up.


5 posted on 09/10/2010 9:28:44 AM PDT by Olympiad Fisherman (Olympiad Fisherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman
Obama targets people and he targets companies.

We should be very hesitant to agree with Obama and say, "Yeah, that CEO: he's a scumbag."

Of course, he might be a bad guy, but my expectation is that if Obama doesn't like him, then the guy is probably OK.

6 posted on 09/10/2010 9:31:58 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Things will change after the revolution, but not before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

“Microbes are consuming the oil in the Gulf...” and then they poop out the Swine Flu, so we are still all going to die..... unless Obama saves us with his magic oil sucking straw.

Send Obama more money, NOW.


7 posted on 09/10/2010 9:39:11 AM PDT by Gator113 (Beauty will devour the Beast in 2012. Kill "Obamamosque"@ Ground Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

Bring out your dead, oh never mind.


8 posted on 09/10/2010 9:42:28 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

There were two companies back in the 1990’s pushing for cap and trade before Bill Clinton and Al Gore. The first was Enron and the second was BP. Both companies were pushing the green economy back then - http://the-classic-liberal.com/bp-enron-cap-trade/. Enron of course went belly up, but BP of course is now beyond petroleum.


9 posted on 09/10/2010 9:45:57 AM PDT by Olympiad Fisherman (Olympiad Fisherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

Amazing how nature deals with it’s own product isn’t it?

It’s not like oil hasn’t been leaking out of the bottom of the Gulf for years, but the one has to make someone pay for his bad publicity.


10 posted on 09/10/2010 9:51:07 AM PDT by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

Trust but verify. I wouldn’t take the admin’s word for diddle.


11 posted on 09/10/2010 9:52:04 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

Everything today by government and media is simply to bash business. I really have a huge problem watching the news.

If they did 10% to the government we would be in an entirely different situation.


12 posted on 09/10/2010 9:55:35 AM PDT by edcoil (Man can do the most amazing things if they have the most amazing things to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

If the impact to fishing an tourism is limited to one summer, will the slush fund be depleted? No wonder BP didn’t want to fully fund it...once the money is in there, its as good as spent on something.


13 posted on 09/10/2010 10:05:11 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

That’s the same stuff that the EPA told them not to use... right?


14 posted on 09/10/2010 12:36:02 PM PDT by ataDude (Its like 1933, mixed with the Carter 70s, plus the books 1984 and Animal Farm, all at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

what are the long term effects of the corexit on fish and wildlife?

Just asking.


15 posted on 09/10/2010 1:11:58 PM PDT by a real Sheila (LIES, LIES, LIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ataDude

Yes.


16 posted on 09/10/2010 1:12:16 PM PDT by Olympiad Fisherman (Olympiad Fisherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olympiad Fisherman

Actually it seems that a large amount of oil has settled on the Gulf floor.

“Scientists on a research vessel in the Gulf of Mexico are finding a substantial layer of oily sediment stretching for dozens of miles in all directions. Their discovery suggests that a lot of oil from the Deepwater Horizon didn’t simply evaporate or dissipate into the water — it has settled to the seafloor.”

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129782098&ft=1&f=1001


17 posted on 09/11/2010 11:51:10 AM PDT by robrose68 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a real Sheila
what are the long term effects of the corexit on fish and wildlife?

If corexit itself degrades, are there any long-term effects?

18 posted on 09/11/2010 11:54:39 AM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson