Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA exploits salmonella eggs recall to pursue food sterilization agenda
http://www.naturalnews.com ^ | Monday, August 23, 2010 | by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

Posted on 08/23/2010 9:05:59 AM PDT by Lucky9teen

(NaturalNews) It's always amusing to see how quickly consumers can be worked up into a false fear frenzy by health authorities. We saw it last year with the overhyped H1N1 swine flu scare which was fanned into a flaming fear fest by WHO advisors on the take from vaccine manufacturers. Now we're getting a new round of fear-mongering from many of the same sources who are warning us about salmonella contaminated eggs.

According to mainstream news sources, a massive 380-million-egg recall has been announced, and these eggs are all so incredibly dangerous that you have to immediately remove them from your refrigerator and take them back to the store where you bought them so that they can be properly destroyed. This is all backed up by phrases like, "It's not worth the risk," and claims that if people eat the eggs, they are taking "too much of a chance."

Pretty scary, huh?

What they're not telling you is that more than 80 percent of the chicken meat bought at grocery stores is consistently contaminated with the exact same salmonella (http://www.naturalnews.com/021258.html). A more recent study conducted by Consumers Union found that two-thirds of grocery store chickens are contaminated every day! (http://www.naturalnews.com/028661_c...)

But you don't hear warnings to "take your chicken back to the store!" or "it's unsafe to eat your chicken!" Ever wonder why?

Or to phrase the question another way, why is salmonella so dangerous on your eggs, but completely safe on your chicken?

The answer is it's not. It's the exact same risk in both cases: Cook either one and you destroy salmonella entirely. Infected eggs are no more dangerous than infected chicken, and infected chicken is apparently so safe that it's sold every single day at your neighborhood grocery store (without any warnings or alarms, I might add). Nobody at the FDA has even mentioned it is recent memory. Salmonella contaminated chicken is apparently a non-issue.

The real reason for the salmonella scare Now, here's the real reason why the issue of chicken contaminated with salmonella is almost never publicized: Because to expose the salmonella contamination of chicken would be to expose the sick, filthy and inhumane practices of the factory-farmed conventional chicken industry.

And the (non-organic) chicken industry doesn't want anyone to start looking into its practices because its practices are just too disgusting for most people to stomach. You might lose your (chicken McNugget) lunch, and then you'd probably stop buying chicken. They can't have that.

If you don't believe me about the disgusting practices of the chicken industry, watch this extremely disturbing (but factual) video on NaturalNews.TV about it (WARNING: Extremely graphic. Highly disturbing. Watch at your own risk.) (http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=FF65E...)

So chicken meat gets a free pass: It's okay with the FDA, the CDC and the USDA that Americans are buying salmonella contamination every single day as long as it's in the form of a piece of chicken flesh.

Why, then, are contaminated eggs being flagged as so dangerous? To answer that, you have to go back to a story I wrote in 2008 called, "FDA Unleashes Mass Irradiation of Spinach, Lettuce and Other Vegetables" (http://www.naturalnews.com/023945.html)

There, following the FDA's demands that spinach and lettuce be irradiated, I explained the FDA's real agenda: "Don't think the FDA will stop with spinach and lettuce, either. They're already talking about irradiating tomatoes, peppers and onions. Before long, radiation could become mandatory for ALL fresh produce..."

It's already happened with almonds, which must now be fumigated or pasteurized in the United States -- a punitive rule that has severely damaged the U.S. almond industry. That took place after an outbreak of contamination with almonds. Similarly, this recent egg contamination fiasco is giving the FDA precisely the excuse it needs to demand routine pasteurization or irradiation of all eggs. Meanwhile, salmonella-contaminated chicken will be utterly ignored by the FDA even as it calls for the mass-pasteurization of "dangerous" eggs.

The FDA, you see, will seize upon each contamination event as a leverage point from which to ratchet up its food sterilization agenda, and the agency won't stop until every scrap of fresh food sold at grocery stores is either pasteurized, fumigated or irradiated.

Only then will the FDA's true agenda of food control be fully realized. (Insert evil genius laughter here.) And this plan of course involves outlawing all raw milk, raw almonds, raw spinach, raw eggs and anything else that might be living. Hence the recent ramping up of criminal arrests and prosecutions against raw milk producers and living food coops.

The only safe food is dead food according to the FDA. And they're going to make sure your food is as dead as possible by exploiting these hyped-up food emergencies as leverage points from which to assert their "dead foods agenda."

The punch line to all this should be obvious by now: Dead foods lead to dead people. When a population is denied access to health-enhancing living foods (raw foods), its health begins to deteriorate. This of course create a financial windfall for the pharmaceutical industry that thrives on suffering and disease. (More vaccines, anyone?)

In other words, keeping the food sterilized means keeping the people diseased. And keeping the people diseased means keeping the sick-care industry rolling in easy cash. There's nothing like a little sickness to remind people to keep taking their pills, after all...

Don't think that this egg recall has anything to do with protecting the health of consumers. Cigarettes kill hundreds of thousands of people a year and they're perfectly legal to sell. Even toxic chemical food ingredients like MSG, aspartame and sodium nitrite remain perfectly legal, too. If the FDA cared about protecting people from dangerous foods, it would have banned disease-causing ingredients long ago. But instead, the agency going after your raw milk, raw eggs, raw spinach and raw almonds.

What does that tell you about the FDA's real intent?


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Food
KEYWORDS: eggs; fda; food; government; irradiation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
I loathe this government and every department/entity within (save the Military)
1 posted on 08/23/2010 9:06:05 AM PDT by Lucky9teen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The List, ping


2 posted on 08/23/2010 9:22:19 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
House Vote on HR2749 (FDA food takeover)
2009 FDA/Food .
Representative HR2749 District
Alabama
Bonner, Jo [R] Nay AL-1
Bright, Bobby [D] Yea AL-2
Rogers, Michael [R] Nay AL-3
Aderholt, Robert [R] Nay AL-4
Griffith, Parker [D] Nay AL-5
Bachus, Spencer [R] Nay AL-6
Davis, Artur [D] Yea AL-7
Alaska
Young, Donald [R] Nay AK-0
Arizona
Kirkpatrick, Ann [D] Yea AZ-1
Franks, Trent [R] Nay AZ-2
Shadegg, John [R] Nay AZ-3
Pastor, Edward [D] Yea AZ-4
Mitchell, Harry [D] Yea AZ-5
Flake, Jeff [R] Nay AZ-6
Grijalva, Raul [D] Yea AZ-7
Giffords, Gabrielle [D] Yea AZ-8
Arkansas
Berry, Robert [D] Yea AR-1
Snyder, Victor [D] Yea AR-2
Boozman, John [R] Nay AR-3
Ross, Mike [D] Yea AR-4
California
Thompson, C. [D] Yea CA-1
Herger, Walter [R] Nay CA-2
Lungren, Daniel [R] Nay CA-3
McClintock, Tom [R] Nay CA-4
Matsui, Doris [D] Yea CA-5
Woolsey, Lynn [D] Nay CA-6
Miller, George [D] Yea CA-7
Pelosi, Nancy [D]
Lee, Barbara [D] Yea CA-9
Tauscher, Ellen
McNerney, Jerry [D] Yea CA-11
Speier, Jackie [D] Yea CA-12
Stark, Fortney [D] Yea CA-13
Eshoo, Anna [D] Yea CA-14
Honda, Michael [D] Yea CA-15
Lofgren, Zoe [D] Yea CA-16
Farr, Sam [D] Yea CA-17
Cardoza, Dennis [D] Yea CA-18
Radanovich, George [R] Nay CA-19
Costa, Jim [D] Yea CA-20
Nunes, Devin [R] Nay CA-21
McCarthy, Kevin [R] Nay CA-22
Capps, Lois [D] Yea CA-23
Gallegly, Elton [R] Nay CA-24
McKeon, Howard [R] Nay CA-25
Dreier, David [R] Nay CA-26
Sherman, Brad [D] Yea CA-27
Berman, Howard [D] Yea CA-28
Schiff, Adam [D] Yea CA-29
Waxman, Henry [D] Yea CA-30
Becerra, Xavier [D] Yea CA-31
Rep. Judy Chu [D-CA32] Yea CA-32
Watson, Diane [D] Yea CA-33
Roybal-Allard, Lucille [D] Yea CA-34
Waters, Maxine [D] Yea CA-35
Harman, Jane [D] Yea CA-36
Richardson, Laura [D] Yea CA-37
Napolitano, Grace [D] Yea CA-38
Sanchez, Linda [D] Yea CA-39
Royce, Edward [R] Nay CA-40
Lewis, Jerry [R] Nay CA-41
Miller, Gary [R] Nay CA-42
Baca, Joe [D] Yea CA-43
Calvert, Ken [R] Nay CA-44
Bono Mack, Mary [R] Nay CA-45
Rohrabacher, Dana [R] Nay CA-46
Sanchez, Loretta [D] Yea CA-47
Campbell, John [R] Nay CA-48
Issa, Darrell [R] Nay CA-49
Bilbray, Brian [R] Nay CA-50
Filner, Bob [D] Yea CA-51
Hunter, Duncan [R] Nay CA-52
Davis, Susan [D] Yea CA-53
Colorado
DeGette, Diana [D] Yea CO-1
Polis, Jared [D] Yea CO-2
Salazar, John [D] Nay CO-3
Markey, Betsy [D] Nay CO-4
Lamborn, Doug [R] Nay CO-5
Coffman, Mike [R] Nay CO-6
Perlmutter, Ed [D] Yea CO-7
Connecticut
Larson, John [D] Yea CT-1
Courtney, Joe [D] Yea CT-2
DeLauro, Rosa [D] Yea CT-3
Himes, James [D] Yea CT-4
Murphy, Christopher [D] Yea CT-5
Delaware
Castle, Michael [R] Yea DE-0
Florida
Miller, Jeff [R] Nay FL-1
Boyd, Allen [D] Yea FL-2
Brown, Corrine [D] Yea FL-3
Crenshaw, Ander [R] Yea FL-4
Brown-Waite, Virginia [R] Nay FL-5
Stearns, Clifford [R] Nay FL-6
Mica, John [R] Nay FL-7
Grayson, Alan [D] Yea FL-8
Bilirakis, Gus [R] Yea FL-9
Young, C. W. [R] Nay FL-10
Castor, Kathy [D] Yea FL-11
Putnam, Adam [R] Yea FL-12
Buchanan, Vern [R] Yea FL-13
Mack, Connie [R] Nay FL-14
Posey, Bill [R] Nay FL-15
Rooney, Thomas [R] Nay FL-16
Meek, Kendrick [D] Yea FL-17
Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana [R] Yea FL-18
Wexler, Robert [D] Yea FL-19
Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D] Yea FL-20
Diaz-Balart, Lincoln [R] Yea FL-21
Klein, Ron [D] Yea FL-22
Hastings, Alcee [D] Yea FL-23
Kosmas, Suzanne [D] Yea FL-24
Diaz-Balart, Mario [R] Yea FL-25
Georgia
Kingston, Jack [R] Nay GA-1
Bishop, Sanford [D] Yea GA-2
Westmoreland, Lynn [R] Nay GA-3
Johnson, Henry [D] Yea GA-4
Lewis, John [D] Yea GA-5
Price, Tom [R] Nay GA-6
Linder, John [R] Nay GA-7
Marshall, James [D] Nay GA-8
Deal, Nathan [R] Yea GA-9
Broun, Paul [R] Nay GA-10
Gingrey, John [R] Yea GA-11
Barrow, John [D] Yea GA-12
Scott, David [D] Yea GA-13
Hawaii
Abercrombie, Neil [D] Yea HI-1
Hirono, Mazie [D] Yea HI-2
Idaho
Minnick, Walter [D] Nay ID-1
Simpson, Michael [R] Nay ID-2
Illinois
Rush, Bobby [D] Yea IL-1
Jackson, Jesse [D] Yea IL-2
Lipinski, Daniel [D] Yea IL-3
Gutierrez, Luis [D] Yea IL-4
Quigley, Mike [D] Yea IL-5
Roskam, Peter [R] Yea IL-6
Davis, Danny [D] Yea IL-7
Bean, Melissa [D] Nay IL-8
Schakowsky, Janice [D] Yea IL-9
Kirk, Mark [R] Yea IL-10
Halvorson, Deborah [D] Yea IL-11
Costello, Jerry [D] Yea IL-12
Biggert, Judy [R] Yea IL-13
Foster, Bill [D] Yea IL-14
Johnson, Timothy [R] Nay IL-15
Manzullo, Donald [R] Nay IL-16
Hare, Phil [D] Yea IL-17
Schock, Aaron [R] Nay IL-18
Shimkus, John [R] Yea IL-19
Indiana
Visclosky, Peter [D] Yea IN-1
Donnelly, Joe [D] Yea IN-2
Souder, Mark [R] Nay IN-3
Buyer, Stephen [R] Yea IN-4
Burton, Dan [R] Nay IN-5
Pence, Mike [R] Nay IN-6
Carson, André [D] Yea IN-7
Ellsworth, Brad [D] Yea IN-8
Hill, Baron [D] Yea IN-9
Iowa
Braley, Bruce [D] Yea IA-1
Loebsack, David [D] Yea IA-2
Boswell, Leonard [D] Yea IA-3
Latham, Thomas [R] Nay IA-4
King, Steve [R] Nay IA-5
Kansas
Moran, Jerry [R] Nay KS-1
Jenkins, Lynn [R] Nay KS-2
Moore, Dennis [D] Yea KS-3
Tiahrt, Todd [R] Nay KS-4
Kentucky
Whitfield, Edward [R] Yea KY-1
Guthrie, Brett [R] Yea KY-2
Yarmuth, John [D] Yea KY-3
Davis, Geoff [R] Nay KY-4
Rogers, Harold [R] Yea KY-5
Chandler, Ben [D] Yea KY-6
Louisiana
Scalise, Steve [R] Yea LA-1
Cao, Anh [R] Yea LA-2
Melancon, Charles [D] Yea LA-3
Fleming, John [R] Nay LA-4
Alexander, Rodney [R] Nay LA-5
Cassidy, Bill [R] Nay LA-6
Boustany, Charles [R] Nay LA-7
Maine
Pingree, Chellie [D] Nay ME-1
Michaud, Michael [D] Yea ME-2
Maryland
Kratovil, Frank [D] Nay MD-1
Ruppersberger, C.A. [D] Yea MD-2
Sarbanes, John [D] Yea MD-3
Edwards, Donna [D] Yea MD-4
Hoyer, Steny [D] Yea MD-5
Bartlett, Roscoe [R] Nay MD-6
Cummings, Elijah [D] Yea MD-7
Van Hollen, Christopher [D] Yea MD-8
Massachusetts
Olver, John [D] Yea MA-1
Neal, Richard [D] Yea MA-2
McGovern, James [D] Yea MA-3
Frank, Barney [D] Yea MA-4
Tsongas, Niki [D] Yea MA-5
Tierney, John [D] Yea MA-6
Markey, Edward [D] Yea MA-7
Capuano, Michael [D] Yea MA-8
Lynch, Stephen [D] Yea MA-9
Delahunt, William [D] Yea MA-10
Michigan
Stupak, Bart [D] Yea MI-1
Hoekstra, Peter [R] Nay MI-2
Ehlers, Vernon [R] Yea MI-3
Camp, David [R] Yea MI-4
Kildee, Dale [D] Yea MI-5
Upton, Frederick [R] Yea MI-6
Schauer, Mark [D] Yea MI-7
Rogers, Michael [R] Yea MI-8
Peters, Gary [D] Yea MI-9
Miller, Candice [R] Yea MI-10
McCotter, Thaddeus [R] Yea MI-11
Levin, Sander [D] Yea MI-12
Kilpatrick, Carolyn [D] Yea MI-13
Conyers, John [D] Yea MI-14
Dingell, John [D] Yea MI-15
Minnesota
Walz, Timothy [D] Yea MN-1
Kline, John [R] Nay MN-2
Paulsen, Erik [R] Yea MN-3
McCollum, Betty [D] Yea MN-4
Ellison, Keith [D] Yea MN-5
Bachmann, Michele [R] Yea MN-6
Peterson, Collin [D] Yea MN-7
Oberstar, James [D] Yea MN-8
Mississippi
Childers, Travis [D] Nay MS-1
Thompson, Bennie [D] Yea MS-2
Harper, Gregg [R] Nay MS-3
Taylor, Gene [D] Nay MS-4
Missouri
Clay, William [D] Yea MO-1
Akin, W. [R] Nay MO-2
Carnahan, Russ [D] Yea MO-3
Skelton, Ike [D] Yea MO-4
Cleaver, Emanuel [D] Yea MO-5
Graves, Samuel [R] Nay MO-6
Blunt, Roy [R] Nay MO-7
Emerson, Jo Ann [R] Nay MO-8
Luetkemeyer, Blaine [R] Nay MO-9
Montana
Rehberg, Dennis [R] Nay MT-0
Nebraska
Fortenberry, Jeffrey [R] Yea NE-1
Terry, Lee [R] Yea NE-2
Smith, Adrian [R] Nay NE-3
Nevada
Berkley, Shelley [D] Yea NV-1
Heller, Dean [R] Nay NV-2
Titus, Dina [D] Yea NV-3
New Hampshire
Shea-Porter, Carol [D] Yea NH-1
Hodes, Paul [D] Yea NH-2
New Jersey
Andrews, Robert [D] Yea NJ-1
LoBiondo, Frank [R] Yea NJ-2
Adler, John [D] Yea NJ-3
Smith, Christopher [R] Yea NJ-4
Garrett, Scott [R] Nay NJ-5
Pallone, Frank [D] Yea NJ-6
Lance, Leonard [R] Yea NJ-7
Pascrell, William [D] Yea NJ-8
Rothman, Steven [D] Yea NJ-9
Payne, Donald [D] Yea NJ-10
Frelinghuysen, Rodney [R] Yea NJ-11
Holt, Rush [D] Yea NJ-12
Sires, Albio [D] Yea NJ-13
New Mexico
Heinrich, Martin [D] Nay NM-1
Teague, Harry [D] Nay NM-2
Lujan, Ben [D] Nay NM-3
New York
Bishop, Timothy [D] Yea NY-1
Israel, Steve [D] Yea NY-2
King, Peter [R] Yea NY-3
McCarthy, Carolyn [D] Not Voting NY-4
Ackerman, Gary [D] Yea NY-5
Meeks, Gregory [D] Yea NY-6
Crowley, Joseph [D] Yea NY-7
Nadler, Jerrold [D] Yea NY-8
Weiner, Anthony [D] Yea NY-9
Towns, Edolphus [D] Yea NY-10
Clarke, Yvette [D] Yea NY-11
Velazquez, Nydia [D] Yea NY-12
McMahon, Michael [D] Yea NY-13
Maloney, Carolyn [D] Yea NY-14
Rangel, Charles [D] Yea NY-15
Serrano, José [D] Yea NY-16
Engel, Eliot [D] Yea NY-17
Lowey, Nita [D] Yea NY-18
Hall, John [D] Yea NY-19
Murphy, Scott [D] Yea NY-20
Tonko, Paul [D] Yea NY-21
Hinchey, Maurice [D] Nay NY-22
McHugh, John [R] Not Voting NY-23
Arcuri, Michael [D] Nay NY-24
Maffei, Daniel [D] Yea NY-25
Lee, Christopher [R] Yea NY-26
Higgins, Brian [D] Yea NY-27
Slaughter, Louise [D] Yea NY-28
Massa, Eric [D] Nay NY-29
North Carolina
Butterfield, George [D] Yea NC-1
Etheridge, Bob [D] Yea NC-2
Jones, Walter [R] Nay NC-3
Price, David [D] Yea NC-4
Foxx, Virginia [R] Nay NC-5
Coble, Howard [R] Nay NC-6
McIntyre, Mike [D] Yea NC-7
Kissell, Larry [D] Yea NC-8
Myrick, Sue [R] Nay NC-9
Mchenry, Patrick [R] Nay NC-10
Shuler, Heath [D] Nay NC-11
Watt, Melvin [D] Yea NC-12
Miller, R. [D] Yea NC-13
North Dakota
Pomeroy, Earl [D] Yea ND-0
Ohio
Driehaus, Steve [D] Yea OH-1
Schmidt, Jean [R] Nay OH-2
Turner, Michael [R] Yea OH-3
Jordan, Jim [R] Nay OH-4
Latta, Robert [R] Nay OH-5
Wilson, Charles [D] Yea OH-6
Austria, Steve [R] Nay OH-7
Boehner, John [R] Nay OH-8
Kaptur, Marcy [D] Yea OH-9
Kucinich, Dennis [D] Yea OH-10
Fudge, Marcia [D] Yea OH-11
Tiberi, Patrick [R] Yea OH-12
Sutton, Betty [D] Yea OH-13
LaTourette, Steven [R] Yea OH-14
Kilroy, Mary Jo [D] Yea OH-15
Boccieri, John [D] Yea OH-16
Ryan, Timothy [D] Yea OH-17
Space, Zachary [D] Yea OH-18
Oklahoma
Sullivan, John [R] Nay OK-1
Boren, Dan [D] Yea OK-2
Lucas, Frank [R] Nay OK-3
Cole, Tom [R] Nay OK-4
Fallin, Mary [R] Nay OK-5
Oregon
Wu, David [D] Yea OR-1
Walden, Greg [R] Yea OR-2
Blumenauer, Earl [D] Nay OR-3
DeFazio, Peter [D] Yea OR-4
Schrader, Kurt [D] Yea OR-5
Pennsylvania
Brady, Robert [D] Yea PA-1
Fattah, Chaka [D] Yea PA-2
Dahlkemper, Kathleen [D] Yea PA-3
Altmire, Jason [D] Yea PA-4
Thompson, Glenn [R] Nay PA-5
Gerlach, Jim [R] Yea PA-6
Sestak, Joe [D] Yea PA-7
Murphy, Patrick [D] Yea PA-8
Shuster, William [R] Nay PA-9
Carney, Christopher [D] Yea PA-10
Kanjorski, Paul [D] Yea PA-11
Murtha, John [D] Yea PA-12
Schwartz, Allyson [D] Yea PA-13
Doyle, Michael [D] Yea PA-14
Dent, Charles [R] Yea PA-15
Pitts, Joseph [R] Nay PA-16
Holden, Tim [D] Yea PA-17
Murphy, Tim [R] Yea PA-18
Platts, Todd [R] Yea PA-19
Rhode Island
Kennedy, Patrick [D] Yea RI-1
Langevin, James [D] Yea RI-2
South Carolina
Brown, Henry [R] Nay SC-1
Wilson, Addison [R] Nay SC-2
Barrett, James [R] Nay SC-3
Inglis, Bob [R] Nay SC-4
Spratt, John [D] Yea SC-5
Clyburn, James [D] Yea SC-6
South Dakota
Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie [D] Yea SD-0
Tennessee
Roe, Phil [R] Nay TN-1
Duncan, John [R] Nay TN-2
Wamp, Zach [R] Nay TN-3
Davis, Lincoln [D] Not Voting TN-4
Cooper, Jim [D] Yea TN-5
Gordon, Barton [D] Yea TN-6
Blackburn, Marsha [R] Nay TN-7
Tanner, John [D] Yea TN-8
Cohen, Steve [D] Yea TN-9
Texas
Gohmert, Louis [R] Nay TX-1
Poe, Ted [R] Nay TX-2
Johnson, Samuel [R] Nay TX-3
Hall, Ralph [R] Nay TX-4
Hensarling, Jeb [R] Nay TX-5
Barton, Joe [R] Yea TX-6
Culberson, John [R] Nay TX-7
Brady, Kevin [R] Nay TX-8
Green, Al [D] Yea TX-9
McCaul, Michael [R] Nay TX-10
Conaway, K. [R] Nay TX-11
Granger, Kay [R] Nay TX-12
Thornberry, William [R] Nay TX-13
Paul, Ronald [R] Nay TX-14
Hinojosa, Rubén [D] Yea TX-15
Reyes, Silvestre [D] Yea TX-16
Edwards, Thomas [D] Yea TX-17
Jackson-Lee, Sheila [D] Yea TX-18
Neugebauer, Randy [R] Nay TX-19
Gonzalez, Charles [D] Yea TX-20
Smith, Lamar [R] Nay TX-21
Olson, Pete [R] Nay TX-22
Rodriguez, Ciro [D] Yea TX-23
Marchant, Kenny [R] Yea TX-24
Doggett, Lloyd [D] Yea TX-25
Burgess, Michael [R] Yea TX-26
Ortiz, Solomon [D] Yea TX-27
Cuellar, Henry [D] Yea TX-28
Green, Raymond [D] Yea TX-29
Johnson, Eddie [D] Yea TX-30
Carter, John [R] Nay TX-31
Sessions, Peter [R] Nay TX-32
Utah
Bishop, Rob [R] Nay UT-1
Matheson, Jim [D] Yea UT-2
Chaffetz, Jason [R] Nay UT-3
Vermont
Welch, Peter [D] Nay VT-0
Virginia
Wittman, Rob [R] Nay VA-1
Nye, Glenn [D] Yea VA-2
Scott, Robert [D] Yea VA-3
Forbes, James [R] Nay VA-4
Perriello, Thomas [D] Nay VA-5
Goodlatte, Robert [R] Nay VA-6
Cantor, Eric [R] Nay VA-7
Moran, James [D] Yea VA-8
Boucher, Frederick [D] Yea VA-9
Wolf, Frank [R] Yea VA-10
Connolly, Gerald [D] Yea VA-11
Washington
Inslee, Jay [D] Yea WA-1
Larsen, Rick [D] Yea WA-2
Baird, Brian [D] Yea WA-3
Hastings, Doc [R] Nay WA-4
McMorris Rodgers, Cathy [R] Nay WA-5
Dicks, Norman [D] Yea WA-6
McDermott, James [D] Yea WA-7
Reichert, Dave [R] Yea WA-8
Smith, Adam [D] Yea WA-9
West Virginia
Mollohan, Alan [D] Yea WV-1
Capito, Shelley [R] Yea WV-2
Rahall, Nick [D] Yea WV-3
Wisconsin
Ryan, Paul [R] Nay WI-1
Baldwin, Tammy [D] Yea WI-2
Kind, Ronald [D] Nay WI-3
Moore, Gwen [D] Yea WI-4
Sensenbrenner, F. [R] Nay WI-5
Petri, Thomas [R] Nay WI-6
Obey, David [D] Yea WI-7
Kagen, Steve [D] Nay WI-8
Wyoming
Lummis, Cynthia [R] Nay WY-0

3 posted on 08/23/2010 9:32:35 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
The premise of this is ridiculous. People eat undercooked runny eggs. People eat raw eggs in homemade mayonnaise. Caesar salad contains raw egg.

People rarely eat raw or undercooked chicken.

4 posted on 08/23/2010 9:38:05 AM PDT by steveo (2010 never again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveo

Furthermore, irradiating food is an excellent means of assuring its safety.


5 posted on 08/23/2010 9:42:20 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

2749: Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2749

Passed the House on Jul 30, 2009

Senate has yet to vote on it, but if you look at the complementary bill (S510) it looks like it has serious opposition in the Senate.

Reported version of S510 on Thomas:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c111:2:./temp/~c111QnCKSF::

Look at the number of “Stuck Out” entries.

NOW this bill is a serious threat to both food cost and freedom to produce food in the U.S. This is a stealth sleeper bill that if it passed the Senate would be in my opinion the ultimate weapon for Despots to control a population. It is also my opinion that is exactly what the House bill was designed to do.

These are Treasonous Acts


6 posted on 08/23/2010 9:45:03 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
Dead foods lead to dead people

I didn't see any reference to peer reviewed studies in the article to support his statement.

As a food service professional that is careful about what I eat, I have no problem with pasturized eggs. Especially now that I'm missing my spleen and have lost some immunity to diseases.

/johnny

7 posted on 08/23/2010 9:45:32 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

Iowa radio talker Jan Mickelson on 1040-WHO radio said this morning he’s getting emails suggesting there may be animal-right wack-o sabotage going on here...


8 posted on 08/23/2010 9:48:06 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Iowa floods, Obama vacations. Moochelle Obama, please pass the cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
Before long, radiation could become mandatory for ALL fresh produce..."

And his problem with this is.....?

Dead foods lead to dead people.

ROFL!

When a population is denied access to health-enhancing living foods (raw foods), its health begins to deteriorate

Irradiating food will deny him access to health-enhancing living foods? Dear Lord. Where do these people come from?

Don't think that this egg recall has anything to do with protecting the health of consumers......Even toxic chemical food ingredients like MSG, aspartame and sodium nitrite remain perfectly legal, too

It appears you don't need to know much about food, food safety, nutrition, or science in general, to write for Natural News and call yourself the Health Ranger. What a buffoon.

9 posted on 08/23/2010 10:02:50 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
The FDA (or any other federal agency) is not required to do any cost-benefit analysis on their regulations.

That has to change.

10 posted on 08/23/2010 10:18:07 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

11 posted on 08/23/2010 4:42:57 PM PDT by CharlesMartelsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

Love the cartoon, it is spot on.

Remember, November is coming soon.


12 posted on 08/23/2010 5:28:22 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist

I’m pro-irradiation personally. Makes eating oysters less nerve-wracking.


13 posted on 08/23/2010 5:37:53 PM PDT by Patriotic1 (Dic mihi solum facta, domina - Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Help FReepers. Is the salmonella just on the shell or in the egg?

If it is only on the shell, what is the problem? Could be all kinds of crap on the ‘container’ of the egg.

And if it’s in the egg, how did it get in there? Something seems weird about this whole thing.


14 posted on 08/23/2010 10:45:45 PM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

Folks need to raise their own eggs (or at least buy from local producers). It’s not that hard, and better for you, and the chickens too. We’ve been doing it for almost ten years and would never go back to the mass produced chicken $#!t they sell in the stores.


15 posted on 08/24/2010 8:05:18 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.....Eagle Scout since Sep 9, 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

Irradiation is a good, healthy way to insure food safety. There’s nothing wrong with irradiation.


16 posted on 08/24/2010 8:07:30 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeStateYank

Inside. it comes from a crappy diet and the un-natural conditions and processes used to produce eggs for the mass market; all of which are not only sanctioned but mandated by the USDA and FDA.


17 posted on 08/24/2010 8:09:55 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.....Eagle Scout since Sep 9, 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: P8riot

Thanks, P8riot!

I’d read that the Fed was gunning for the company [ticker:CALM] based on price fixing. Seems there are more rotten areas in the egg business.


18 posted on 08/24/2010 10:22:44 AM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: P8riot
it comes from a crappy diet and the un-natural conditions and processes used to produce eggs for the mass market; all of which are not only sanctioned but mandated by the USDA and FDA.

This is nonsense. Salmonella can infect the ovaries of healthy looking hens whether they're considered mass marketed, Kosher, organic, free range or natural. You can't tell by looking at the bird, or where the bird comes from, if it's infected with salmonella. Even infected birds will produce lots of "normal" eggs before offering up a contaminated one. That's why raw eggs need to be cooked.

19 posted on 08/24/2010 1:16:26 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mase
This is nonsense. Salmonella can infect the ovaries of healthy looking hens whether they're considered mass marketed, Kosher, organic, free range or natural. You can't tell by looking at the bird, or where the bird comes from, if it's infected with salmonella. Even infected birds will produce lots of "normal" eggs before offering up a contaminated one. That's why raw eggs need to be cooked.

True, but the potential for infection in mass market birds is greater due to their living conditions and diet. It is impossible to ensure sanitary conditions for birds when they are concentrated in an area that gives each bird less than one square foot in which to live, eat, and defecate. I have a friend here in Virginia that keeps hundreds of free range birds, that produce eggs of a documented higher quality than anything you will buy in a store, even so certified "organic" eggs.

Free range birds eat their natural diet and are healthier than mass market birds who eat a diet that is formulated for egg production not necessarily the health of the bird; unhealthy birds are more likely to harbor the salmonella virus. Also, after the eggs are laid they mingle with the eggs of thousands of other birds and the potential for cross contamination increases. Moreover, the protective outer shell of the egg is removed during processing which leaves the porous shell even more susceptible to bacterial infestation.

20 posted on 08/25/2010 4:55:39 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.....Eagle Scout since Sep 9, 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson