Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barnett v Obama: Appellants' Opening Brief, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
9th Circuit Court of Appeals ^ | 08/06/2010 | Orly Tatiz

Posted on 08/13/2010 12:35:03 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan

Orly Taitz closes her brief with the following:

"Shortly after Judge Carter completely changed his tune, Taitz came to the court house, brought some pleadings and heard the Marine march playing. Judge Carter, a former Marine was celebrating the Marine Corps day. There was a huge teddy bear sitting in the midst of the hallway, it had a shirt with the Marine insignia, the band was playing, clerk Sidharth Velamoor was there, all the other clerks and employees were there. Everyone was waiting for Judge Carter and the cake. Taitz started choking and trying to gather some strength to hold back tears. The only ones, who were missing, were Marines. The same Marines, whom Carter named cowards for standing up for the Constitution of this country, Marines, who sacrificed their carriers, earnings, who risked retaliation were called cowards.

Taitz turned around and left, and the Marine March kept playing on and on, on and on ... "

(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Humor; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; barnettvobama; birthers; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; orly; orlytaitz; taitz; whackamole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Tex-Con-Man

Oh, too cute, Abu Tex-Con-Man...


61 posted on 08/14/2010 6:47:47 AM PDT by RowdyFFC (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

No, they’re not, they’re vile insults from a bunch of chest beating misogynists just like the ones they threw at the woman before they cut her nose off, or the one they buried and stoned because she couldn’t find four male scab witnesses that would fess up.


62 posted on 08/14/2010 6:50:42 AM PDT by RowdyFFC (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

Your hero is a damned idiot who shames the birther movement. She has no business ever stepping foot in a courtroom since she has no clue. A stream of consciousness blather is NOT a legal brief.

And if you think the above is equivalent of cutting someone’s nose off, you are an idiot as well.


63 posted on 08/14/2010 7:08:35 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: FreeStateYank
Like a morbid curiosity at a car accident, I find myself wondering how does the dental chair sex figure into his lawsuit?

It doesn't really; Lincoln was trying to embarass Orly and get her in trouble with her husband. But Orly was nuts to hire a convicted felon as her de-facto law partner, so I have little sympathy for her.

64 posted on 08/14/2010 1:19:58 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: Lurking Libertarian

It doesn’t really; Lincoln was trying to embarass Orly and get her in trouble with her husband. But Orly was nuts to hire a convicted felon as her de-facto law partner, so I have little sympathy for her.


In my gut, I believe Orly Taitz to be an Obama false flag operation. She is so successful at poisoning the well for other legitimate attorneys through the precedents she sets. Her latest filing is full of misspelled words and tortured grammar and anyone who pisses off as many judges as she does deserves to be disbarred for that alone.
When an attorney pursuing a case calls the judge “a traitor” it makes it unlikely the judge is going to rule favorably on that attorney’s behalf.

As Judge Carter said of Orly: “Plaintiffs (Orly) have encouraged the Court to ignore the mandates of the Constitution; to ignore the limits put on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by “We the people,” over sixty-nine million of the people.
Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the Constitutional role and jurisdiction of the Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the the ultimate reflection of patriotism.”—US District Court Judge David O. Carter, Barnett et. al. v Obama, et. al. 10/29/09


66 posted on 08/14/2010 7:46:33 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson