Posted on 08/13/2010 12:35:03 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
Orly Taitz closes her brief with the following:
"Shortly after Judge Carter completely changed his tune, Taitz came to the court house, brought some pleadings and heard the Marine march playing. Judge Carter, a former Marine was celebrating the Marine Corps day. There was a huge teddy bear sitting in the midst of the hallway, it had a shirt with the Marine insignia, the band was playing, clerk Sidharth Velamoor was there, all the other clerks and employees were there. Everyone was waiting for Judge Carter and the cake. Taitz started choking and trying to gather some strength to hold back tears. The only ones, who were missing, were Marines. The same Marines, whom Carter named cowards for standing up for the Constitution of this country, Marines, who sacrificed their carriers, earnings, who risked retaliation were called cowards.
Taitz turned around and left, and the Marine March kept playing on and on, on and on ... "
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
Oh, too cute, Abu Tex-Con-Man...
No, they’re not, they’re vile insults from a bunch of chest beating misogynists just like the ones they threw at the woman before they cut her nose off, or the one they buried and stoned because she couldn’t find four male scab witnesses that would fess up.
Your hero is a damned idiot who shames the birther movement. She has no business ever stepping foot in a courtroom since she has no clue. A stream of consciousness blather is NOT a legal brief.
And if you think the above is equivalent of cutting someone’s nose off, you are an idiot as well.
It doesn't really; Lincoln was trying to embarass Orly and get her in trouble with her husband. But Orly was nuts to hire a convicted felon as her de-facto law partner, so I have little sympathy for her.
It doesn’t really; Lincoln was trying to embarass Orly and get her in trouble with her husband. But Orly was nuts to hire a convicted felon as her de-facto law partner, so I have little sympathy for her.
As Judge Carter said of Orly: “Plaintiffs (Orly) have encouraged the Court to ignore the mandates of the Constitution; to ignore the limits put on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by “We the people,” over sixty-nine million of the people.
Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the Constitutional role and jurisdiction of the Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the the ultimate reflection of patriotism.”—US District Court Judge David O. Carter, Barnett et. al. v Obama, et. al. 10/29/09
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.