Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Scientist Takes On Gravity
NY Times ^ | July 12, 2010 | DENNIS OVERBYE

Posted on 07/13/2010 3:35:33 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo

By It’s hard to imagine a more fundamental and ubiquitous aspect of life on the Earth than gravity, from the moment you first took a step and fell on your diapered bottom to the slow terminal sagging of flesh and dreams.

But what if it’s all an illusion, a sort of cosmic frill, or a side effect of something else going on at deeper levels of reality?

So says Erik Verlinde, 48, a respected string theorist and professor of physics at the University of Amsterdam, whose contention that gravity is indeed an illusion has caused a continuing ruckus among physicists, or at least among those who profess to understand it. Reversing the logic of 300 years of science, he argued in a recent paper, titled “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton,” that gravity is a consequence of the venerable laws of thermodynamics, which describe the behavior of heat and gases.

“For me gravity doesn’t exist,” said Dr. Verlinde, who was recently in the United States to explain himself. Not that he can’t fall down, but Dr. Verlinde is among a number of physicists who say that science has been looking at gravity the wrong way and that there is something more basic, from which gravity “emerges,” the way stock markets emerge from the collective behavior of individual investors or that elasticity emerges from the mechanics of atoms.

Looking at gravity from this angle, they say, could shed light on some of the vexing cosmic issues of the day, like the dark energy, a kind of anti-gravity that seems to be speeding up the expansion of the universe, or the dark matter that is supposedly needed to hold galaxies together.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; physics; science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Kevmo; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
Thanks Kevmo. Gravity's gonna win. ;')


· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·
Eugene Podkletnov site:freerepublic.com
Google

41 posted on 07/14/2010 5:14:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/podkletnov/index


42 posted on 07/14/2010 5:15:11 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
Thanks again Kevmo, now that I think about this some more...
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

43 posted on 07/14/2010 5:56:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Gravity is an electrostatic dipole effect of sorts

String theory, as you noted, is BS of the worst sort. One of the basic ideas is to give the evolosers an infinity of universes to work with since they know the odds against evoloserism with just the one universe we see around us.

44 posted on 07/14/2010 6:09:38 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bennowens

And that is exactly it.


45 posted on 07/14/2010 8:18:45 PM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Yet, what has always given string, or M-Theory it´s strong appeal is that it mathematically unifies relativity and quantum theory as no other framework ever has. This alone is what holds so many in it´s...charm.


46 posted on 07/14/2010 8:23:48 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Yeah, right.

Gravity is an illusion, and M-Theory is truth.

Pull the other 11 ones.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

47 posted on 07/14/2010 8:33:05 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
The String theorists really want this. I suppose it makes their whole viewpoint of how things operate much easier to do.

A few years ago weren't the same people saying gravity was a strong force rather than a weak force? Helped make the rest of the theories work...

48 posted on 09/14/2010 8:18:05 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/09/the_power_of_images_turned_aga.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson