Posted on 06/27/2010 1:57:46 PM PDT by Daffynition
Never had this problem at “Sam’s Club”. Cosco is a Democrat contibuting org.
LOL!!
I hear ya....!
Touche! Lol!
Turning into a grammar putz is unbecoming.
Could be, same mentality. :O)
When I pay for a purchase, my transaction is done. What was the merchants is now mine by dint of the transaction. This POS store run by liberals has decided to add an extra step. You have to prove you paid for what you are taking out of the store after you have gone through checkout. Fine. They have decided they cater to criminals. Well, this woman wasn't a criminal. She actually bought what she was taking out of the store. She showed the receipt to the door Nazi. Door Nazi decided that wasn't good enough.
And then the door Nazi assaults the customer who owns the merchandise.
You side with the door Nazi.
So you have decided that it is okay to assault women as the leave a store with what they bought. WTF does that say about you?
Is it legal to search shopping bags?
“It is very understandable that some people feel very insulted to be treated like a potential criminal after they have potentially been loyal shoppers at the store for many years,” said Ridout.
So fine with it or not, here’s the question: can the stores do that?
“They can certainly ask your permission to see the receipt in the bag, but that is all they are doing; asking your permission,” said Golden Gate University Professor Rachel Van Cleave.
“So you can say ‘no’,?” asked Finney.
“Yes,” said Van Cleave.
If a shopkeeper has reason to believe you stole something, he has the right to detain you until the authorities get there. But here’s the rub: They have to suspect you not everyone who walks into their store.
We asked the stores about their receipt check policies.
Did the following stores lie?
Costco says the receipt check does work to reduce loss, while protecting both the store and customer. Wal-Mart told me it focuses its checks only on items not in a bag, a TV for instance and on items that set off the electronic alarm. Best Buy says its policy is to randomly check receipts and at times focus on particular items.
She tried to exit through the entrance. If she doesent want to follow the rules of the membership which she AGREED to follow, then she should shop elsewhere.
Everything beyond that fact is just WHINING.. Oh, and I'm sure few personal injury lawyers would pick up her case (poor thing has a bruised purse !)
She paid for the merchandise that she took out of the store. So the loss prevention protocol doesn't apply. If she chose to, the lawsuit would make her rich.
You’ve had to show your receipt to get out of Costco since day one, back when it was Price Club. This shouldn’t be news to this person, and if they were running late then maybe they shouldn’t have stopped.
Many of us idiots, especially the congratulated idiots, use the word perhaps to mean maybe or possibly so it will not be mistaken for an assumption.
In addition, I thought you were quite clear in saying why the employee decided to grab you and you were quite clear that you knew exactly what you did to cause it.
That does not condone the employee's action but it does point out your responsibility in the matter. I suggest you accept your responsibility lest someone mistaken you for an idiot, perhaps without a congratulation.
The article states that the door had an exit sign above it. So guess what? Your argument is invalid. You are grasping at straws. She showed her receipt to the employee at one of the doors. She followed the agreement.
She was assaulted. Battery occured. Now you might want to justify some twit attacking a legitimate customer, but this American doesn’t. So where does that leave you?
And have you seen some of the injury photos of a woman who has had her purse removed from her shoulder forcibly? The bruising can be horrific. Again, you seem to support this. Why?
—”I did read the above sentence, and it has no bearing on what I wrote to you.”
It has 100% bearing. You assume that this was that persons job, just because she was standing by the door. The other eight people in line weren’t running to the other door, now were they???
—”The employee refused to do her job, and then assaulted the customer.”
How do you know? Isn’t Costco union? Maybe she was from a different department and had clocked out waiting for a friend?? You don’t know any of that!
All I know is— there is a policy. When you shop there, you KNOW that’s the kind of BS you have to deal with in a Costco.
She signed up for this:
“Costco [PDF, pg 14]: “To ensure that all members are correctly charged for the merchandise purchased, all receipts and merchandise will be inspected as you leave the warehouse.”
Dude... There is a difference between a misspelling and a typo.
We use it to add to our supply of bulk staples for the coming hard times. It's hard to beat their prices on those items.
And we've always had excellent service at our local store. Believe me we've also seen Divas like this woman who consider them selves far too important to follow the regular, well posted, and agreed upon procedures. As I said in my first reply to you I think part of the Membership Agreement should be that other shoppers be allowed to administer a righteous beat down to people who act like this.
Ahhh, Bravo Sierra! And that is the kindest thing that can be said about that crap you just posted.
You are trying to justify the assault of a customer who paid for her purchase. So you use the communist reasoning that it ‘wasn’t her job as she stood at the door’. Commiecutter? Thats your handle? You do do know that the unions are communist fronts, yes?
Union are you? SEIU maybe?
Good one! Actually after the "rush" she goes and sits in her car for 5 minutes - so the CPR thing was obviously out...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.