She tried to exit through the entrance. If she doesent want to follow the rules of the membership which she AGREED to follow, then she should shop elsewhere.
Everything beyond that fact is just WHINING.. Oh, and I'm sure few personal injury lawyers would pick up her case (poor thing has a bruised purse !)
The article states that the door had an exit sign above it. So guess what? Your argument is invalid. You are grasping at straws. She showed her receipt to the employee at one of the doors. She followed the agreement.
She was assaulted. Battery occured. Now you might want to justify some twit attacking a legitimate customer, but this American doesn’t. So where does that leave you?
And have you seen some of the injury photos of a woman who has had her purse removed from her shoulder forcibly? The bruising can be horrific. Again, you seem to support this. Why?