The article states that the door had an exit sign above it. So guess what? Your argument is invalid. You are grasping at straws. She showed her receipt to the employee at one of the doors. She followed the agreement.
She was assaulted. Battery occured. Now you might want to justify some twit attacking a legitimate customer, but this American doesn’t. So where does that leave you?
And have you seen some of the injury photos of a woman who has had her purse removed from her shoulder forcibly? The bruising can be horrific. Again, you seem to support this. Why?
I shop there all the time. Everyone who shops there knows you dont exit through the Entrance.
Unless she is brain dead she knows the same thing. She was in a hurry and decided to break the rules and then whine about it when somebody put up a tepid defense. Of course , we live in the 21 st century and everybody sues for everything, so I suggest she go right ahead. However, I strongly suspect she'll win nothing, but be my guest.