Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sting and Soros Hook Up For A Duet Of Pro-Drug Stupidity
Big Hollywood ^ | June 11, 2010 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 06/11/2010 11:39:21 AM PDT by Mozilla

Seeing that George Soros and Sting are working together to “end the drug war” puts me in mind of a story an Army buddy who works in the DEA told me about busting in the door of a drug house only to find three occupants – the oldest four years old, having been left in charge while his “parents” went out to score meth. Yeah, drug use is a victimless crime – if you ignore the victims.

Apparently not content to subsidize the whining of the nonentities at Media Matters, Soros is taking a break from his adventures in currency manipulation and general scuzziness to enlist entertainment celebrities like Sting in his newest quest. The Drug Policy Alliance is the result, a group whose members, as its founder puts it, “come from across the drug use spectrum.” Yes, the junkies, stoners, hopheads, dope fiends, pill-poppers, and Lindsay Lohan are unanimous: Drug laws are bad, and it’s probably BusHitler’s fault.

The threshold problem with comments by Sting such as, “The war on drugs represents an extraordinary violation of human rights,” is that Sting presumably not only believes this piffle, but further believes that he can put down his bass and offer meaningful input into the discussion. This assumption of competence is a common delusion among celebrities, and here it has more potential for damage than most mindless celebribabble.

Now, Sting is not alone – no one in that clip says anything worthwhile. One woman, who is bald for no apparent reason, states that “The War on Drugs is a war on people of color,” as if Americans decided they would outlaw crack because they fear that black people might enjoy themselves.

(Excerpt) Read more at bighollywood.breitbart.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: commerceclause; drugwar; liberals; soros; sting; wickard; wod
Sounds like these libutards took too many drugs already. They fried themselves to max and are now wanting everyone to be as screwed up as they are. They spout off pro-drug crap like this and get kids hooked on them. I am not in favor of legalizing Drugs. Otherwise bad people will get kids hooked on them.
1 posted on 06/11/2010 11:39:22 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

The video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0A1XTlJAio&feature=player_embedded


2 posted on 06/11/2010 11:40:04 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

There are many conservative who are opposed to legalizing drugs, but nevertheless believe the current ‘war on drugs’ is stupid, oppressive, and counterproductive.

They’re not sure exactly what we ought to do instead, but would like to explore alternatives.


3 posted on 06/11/2010 11:41:29 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

At last!

The “opiate for the masses” can be Opiates for the Asses!


4 posted on 06/11/2010 11:43:18 AM PDT by jessduntno (America is now just like Easy Company in Bastogne...and Obama is Lt. Dike. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Your response seems reasonable, thoughtful, and balanced. It has no place in a thread about the WOD!


5 posted on 06/11/2010 11:51:44 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
They’re not sure exactly what we ought to do instead, but would like to explore alternatives.

If they offered any alternatives, I'd listen. But I've heard none other than legalizing and taxing, decriminalizing and looking the other way. I'm more of the "cut off the head and the snake will die" school myself; kill the top people who produce and distribute the crap, and as far down the food chain as necessary. Starting with Soros himself would be a public service!

Alternatives, PLEASE!

6 posted on 06/11/2010 12:01:27 PM PDT by JimRed (To water the Tree of Liberty is to excise a cancer before it kills us. TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Drugs were illegal from the '30s through the '70s, yet we didn't have these paramilitary no-knock raids, nor asset forfeiture either. A return to that status quo would not bother me at all.

I am increasingly convinced that the war on drugs, like the wars on poverty and terror, are being fought so as never to be won. That way the government budgets and the restrictions on freedom always grow, never wither....

7 posted on 06/11/2010 12:54:29 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (I've been ionized, but I'm okay now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

cause........like......you don’t go to Tea Parties when you’re stoned, man......like, ya dig?


8 posted on 06/11/2010 1:11:33 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Suppose California voters pass the measure to legalize marijuana this November.

Would you support their 10th Amendment prerogative to enact the policy without fedgov interference? Or, would you support fedgov shutting it down under authority of the Commerce Clause?

9 posted on 06/11/2010 1:13:45 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Alternatives, PLEASE!

How about the constitutional alternative - let the States decide intrastate drug policies and have fedgov butt out. You don't support the New Deal Commerce Clause, do you?

10 posted on 06/11/2010 1:17:02 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Pushing for "Drug Freedom" is not new for Soros. Its been part of his "Open Society" campaign since the beginning and his organization is worldwide.
11 posted on 06/11/2010 1:19:03 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Sting is extremely disciplined and intelligent. He can toke up now and then and take ayahuasca which he has. He helped popularize it. Others that take drugs and don’t have that discipline.... They will destroy themselves and others and their children possibly

Sting has just made it more cool for teens to take drugs too. Something I’m sure he prohibits his own children from doing


12 posted on 06/11/2010 1:35:15 PM PDT by dennisw (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid - Gen Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
...let the States decide intrastate drug policies and have fedgov butt out. You don't support the New Deal Commerce Clause, do you?

I'm not at all fond of the Commerce Clause, but until it is repealed or amended it is the law, just like the first, second and fifth amendments. As far as I'm concerned the fewer things the Feds have a hand in, the better.

Having all the druggies flee to the "tolerant" states has much to be said for it, until it happens to MY state!

13 posted on 06/11/2010 2:11:52 PM PDT by JimRed (To water the Tree of Liberty is to excise a cancer before it kills us. TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson