Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds get picky over what makes oil 'extra virgin'
AP ^ | 060410 | JULIANA BARBASSA

Posted on 06/04/2010 4:31:40 PM PDT by Artemis Webb

CARMEL VALLEY, Calif. – Extra virgin, light, with lemon, unfiltered, cold-pressed: the variety of olive oil on most supermarket shelves is dazzling. But what does it all mean?

These terms might be common currency among foodies and the farmer's market crowd, but they have never been enforceable, or legally defined in the United States — until now.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture in April adopted scientifically verifiable standards for nomenclature such as "virgin" or "extra virgin," with extra virgin considered the highest quality because it has the best flavor.

(snip)

"It will put an end to marketing terms that are confusing to the consumer, such as light, extra light — language that really doesn't meant too much," said Patricia Darragh, executive director of the California Olive Oil Council, a trade association of producers responsible for most US-grown olive oil.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Food
KEYWORDS: canola; chlorophyll; fakeoliveoil; oliveoil; soy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
The new rules kick in in October. Honestly I'm glad to see it.
1 posted on 06/04/2010 4:31:41 PM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb
Extra virgin, light, with lemon, unfiltered, cold-pressed: the variety of olive oil on most supermarket shelves is dazzling. But what does it all mean?

Don Vito will make sure that they buy it- whatever it is.

(From the book, not the movie.)

2 posted on 06/04/2010 4:33:59 PM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb
If you need the FedGov to explain olive oil to you, you might be a pro-government statist.

/johnny

3 posted on 06/04/2010 4:34:09 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

If you can tell first cold press from oil diluted with cottonseed oil by looking you’re God.


4 posted on 06/04/2010 4:36:32 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (DeMint 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb
Seriously, now that I think about it, what part of the Constitution gives the federal government the power to regulate what we call our food? And how can a conservative think that government over-reaching is a GoodThing(tm)?

/johnny

5 posted on 06/04/2010 4:36:38 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

6 posted on 06/04/2010 4:36:48 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb
Honestly I'm glad to see it.

Never thought I would see FReepers cheer for Big Brother being the language police.. but today is weird. Earlier today we had some guy rooting for those Hippie pirate Sea Shepards.

7 posted on 06/04/2010 4:38:10 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley

Yes, Clemenza and Tessio are the ‘salesmen’, with the Don stepping in only if a shop owner refuses their ‘sales talk’ .... (from the book)


8 posted on 06/04/2010 4:38:39 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

If I thought it was the government overreaching I might agree with you. But I don’t.


9 posted on 06/04/2010 4:40:07 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (DeMint 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

So am I. There’s nothing wrong in demanding standards and transparency in marketing guidelines. If you market your olive oil as “extra virgin”, it had better be “extra virgin”, meeting a well-defined standard. This is exactly like our standards of gold. Gold sold as 18k had better be 18k, or someone’s going to be looking at fraud charges.


10 posted on 06/04/2010 4:40:27 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight

Yup.

As an aside, I was amazed that Clemenza was ever suspected of anything- he struck me as wholeheartedly loyal to the core.


11 posted on 06/04/2010 4:40:52 PM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
"Never thought I would see FReepers cheer for Big Brother being the language police.."

Really? So you don't mind when you buy something marketed as "sterling silver" and you find out later it's really just chrome plated? You're fine with that? You don't think the government has any role in enforcing "truth in advertising" standards?

12 posted on 06/04/2010 4:42:52 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

All I want is to be getting Extra Virgin Olive Oil when I pay for Extra Virgin Olive Oil. Fraud is too easy and the consumer can’t tell a difference by appearance.


13 posted on 06/04/2010 4:43:01 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (DeMint 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb
So, what part of the Constitution gives the Federal Government the right to regulate the naming or characterization of food-stuffs?

That looks like a State function or a tort, from my point of view.

/johnny

14 posted on 06/04/2010 4:43:08 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

So in the the Popeye cartoon; Was Olive Oil a virgin or extra virgin?


15 posted on 06/04/2010 4:43:27 PM PDT by tophat9000 (It ain't about Black... It ain't about White...It's about a Red...Trying to take our rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Re #10 and #12:

Good analogies.


16 posted on 06/04/2010 4:44:40 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (DeMint 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
and you find out later it's really just chrome plated?

That is a tort, individually, and possibly fraud charges at the State level.

What gives the FedGov the lawful power to regulate that?

/johnny

17 posted on 06/04/2010 4:44:51 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Labeling. If it says 100% cotton, it better be. If it says no peanuts [to avoid nut allergies], it better be.

If it says 70% chocolate, or Dutch process, or water process ... or that the ciffee beans are from Columbia. Nothing wrong with accurate labeling.


18 posted on 06/04/2010 4:44:56 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Nothing wrong with accurate labeling.

Where does the power to enforce that reside, Constitutionally? At the state level? Or FedGov?

/johnny

19 posted on 06/04/2010 4:46:21 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Does the FDA do it now? How could the states individually regulate labeling?


20 posted on 06/04/2010 4:46:49 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson