I don't know anything about the author of this piece so don't shoot the messenger!
1 posted on
06/03/2010 6:59:40 AM PDT by
RoseyT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: RoseyT
Freedom of the press is a great concept -- but if everyone has a printing press (if everyone can create media) then the First Amendment starts to lose some luster for the political establishment.
Recording the actions of our public servants is almost a civic duty, in my opinion. What do they have to hide?
To: RoseyT
Of course in cases where recorders capture evidence of “police brutality” or “oppression” there will be no problem.These laws are meant to protect political hacks and their friends....not law abiding citizens.At least that's the case in Massachusetts.
3 posted on
06/03/2010 7:03:40 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
To: RoseyT
Yet the government can put up CCTVs EVERYWHERE to watch the citizen they consider to be “mindless sheep to the slaughter”. But if we want to record them, we don’t have the “right” to watch them....
What’s next, will the congress critters make investigating congress illegal?
4 posted on
06/03/2010 7:03:51 AM PDT by
GraceG
To: RoseyT
All three states are among the most screamingly liberal in the nation. Citizens, submit to the police state.
6 posted on
06/03/2010 7:07:03 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: RoseyT
Most all-party-consent states also include an exception for recording in public places where "no expectation of privacy exists" (Illinois does not) but in practice this exception is not being recognized. Obviously something that needs to be considered by the courts.Even the SCOTUS if necessary.Cockroach hack politicians and their "civil service" cronies fear "sunlight".
7 posted on
06/03/2010 7:07:27 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
To: RoseyT
The argument Big Brother always uses in defense of his total-surveillance state is that the only reason you would object to being taped is because you have something to hide.
The police are objecting to being taped, therefore Big Brother is admitting they have something to hide.
8 posted on
06/03/2010 7:08:21 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
To: RoseyT
10 posted on
06/03/2010 7:08:44 AM PDT by
GraceG
To: RoseyT
Ha!
Video as you please.
Have someone else post it to YouTube.
11 posted on
06/03/2010 7:09:33 AM PDT by
G Larry
To: RoseyT
Man....I am a police officer....and this is bulsh&#T. I only have nine more years...will be glad to get out of this work...seriously...seen too much go on that makes me uncomfortable...just keep doin whats right...pray for the best...sighs. Do have the concern that the videos can be reworked to make things look a certain way...this goes for both sides by the way. Welcome to Amerika
19 posted on
06/03/2010 7:24:58 AM PDT by
bike800
To: RoseyT
Well now gee whiz, what’s all the fuss? After all EVERYBODY KNOWS that the police/bureaucrats/politicians/public union employees are the GOOD GUYS! It’s the “little people”...you know, the citizen-nobodies who need watched!!
To: RoseyT
As I’ve always said, the police aren’t citizens since they aren’t subject to our nation’s laws.
Pathetic.
21 posted on
06/03/2010 7:26:00 AM PDT by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: RoseyT
"The legal justification for arresting the "shooter" rests on existing wiretapping or eavesdropping laws, with statutes against obstructing law enforcement sometimes cited." Absurd. Illogical. Typical Statist protections (liberal / progressive control).
The NEA protects bad teachers through tenure and other means. Incompetent, redundant, or unethical government workers are next to impossible to fire. The UAW protects the lowest quality workers in their ranks versus enforcing a standard of excellence.
Protect your kingdom.
22 posted on
06/03/2010 7:26:39 AM PDT by
uncommonsense
(Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
To: RoseyT
In at least three states, it is now illegal to record any on-duty police officer. Completely unconstitutional.
To: RoseyT
Most all-party-consent states also include an exception for recording in public places where "no expectation of privacy exists" (Illinois does not) but in practice this exception is not being recognized. So the public has "surrendered" their right to not be recorded but the police don't. No wonder they don't want cameras in the jails to catch them beating up those arrested.
It's good to be the king.
To: RoseyT
“In at least three states, it is now illegal to record any on-duty police officer”
That’s a pretty stupid law. Nice way to alienate your constituents. It’s like passing a law that says you can’t give city councilmen funny looks. Except in that case, the law would encourage less beatings with heavy objects.
To: RoseyT
I just bought a few of these key fob recorders off of ebay. Nine bucks. And that includes shipping.
27 posted on
06/03/2010 8:11:56 AM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(What's black and white and red all over? - OBAMA)
To: RoseyT
this law violates the exculpatory evidence rule and it flies in the face of laws which ALLOW police to record you if they arrest you how are holding you in custody, or just doing a simple terry stop.
28 posted on
06/03/2010 8:19:33 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: RoseyT
29 posted on
06/03/2010 8:38:06 AM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
35 posted on
06/03/2010 4:17:40 PM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: RoseyT
If two party consent is required, wouldn’t that prevent police dash cams from recording until the police officer got consent from the citizen being recorded?
36 posted on
06/03/2010 4:20:04 PM PDT by
magellan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson