Posted on 05/19/2010 10:21:40 AM PDT by rocco55
Dear Mr. Farah,
I am a financial supporter of WND and would like to suggest that someone from your staff conduct an interview with Mrs. Nordyke from HI.
She recently had a phone interview with a liberal news agency and the ensuing article was cleverly written in such a way to lead believers to the conclusion that Mrs. Nordyke's twins, who were born one after Obama in HI, purportedly at the "same hospital as Obama", was a fact.
Ironically, Mrs. Nordyke (who has posted LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFCATES of both of her twins born on Aug 5,1961) never actually stated that she ever saw BO's mother, or had any conclusive evidence that BO was actually born in the same hospital as her twin daughters.
If someone can contact her while she is still coherent (she is now 82 ! ) and inquire as to when she obtained these birth certificates, it would contradict the State if HI's new claim that all of the original records were destroyed !
Also, one might ask her if she finds it at all strange that she (as a simple citizen) posted her daughters BC's on line for public viewing and BO, the President of the U.S. who claims to have a "transparent administration to insure that accurate information is made available to the public" will NOT post his BC ! ?
Along with MILLIONS of readers, I would be very curious as to how she would respond to a question like that !
I think it would be safe to assume that the majority of your supporters and patriotic "truth-seekers", would consider this an EXTREMELY URGENT priority news item worthy of immediate pursuance!
Thank you for your time.
"I am not aware of any birth certificate records that have been destroyed by the department," Janice Okubo, public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, told WND. "When the department went electronic in 2001, vital records, whether in paper form or any other form, [were] maintained. We don't destroy records."
Okubo affirmed that beginning in 2001, all vital records, including birth records, moved to electronic formats.
"Any records that we had in paper or any other form before 2001 are still in file within the department," she insisted. "We have not destroyed any vital statistics records that we have."
Doesn't matter if the state CLAIMS they are destroyed, (A)A Hawaiian official CLAIMS to have seen Obama's long form cert. and says "trust me". (B) Barack Obama himself claimed to have held a copy (he mentions it in his book while discussing going through some old papers).
Hawaiian officials are stonewalling.
RD, I am aware of this comment from last year, but just yesterday, there was a post (11:41 AM) indicating that the records were “destroyed” ? I don’t trust ANY of these
“LYIN’ HAWAIIANS” ! They’re all involved in the cover-up. It’s pitiful-—State employed HI criminals and politicians. They should all be arrested !
Do you actually think that the state of Hawaii or any state would actually destroy original paper records? And that the state of Hawaii did this in 2001 as a cover-up because they knew Obambi would run for President and be elected in 2008?
The cover-up and high degree of malfeasance is one of the greatest government controlled criminal conspiracies this nation has ever experienced. I wouldn’t put it past the State of HI to agree to destroy all of BO’s documents and state that they were destroyed in 2001. If they hide all the evidence, who can expose them ? Their job is to follow orders from the “powers that be”, protect the President and hide everything from the public, despite their own laws that demand the release of these docs. Heck, they already CREATED and APPROVED A NEW LAW for this purpose. In a word -”Unconscionable” !
If you looked at them closely, you'd see they were obtained in 1966, most likely for when the twins, and The One, would have needed them for entry into kindergarten. (It's so much more important to prove you are who and what you say you are when starting kindergarten, than when taking on the job as "man with his finger on the nuclear trigger")
It wouldn't matter if all the original records were destroyed. They were converted to electronic form. Per Hawaii statute:
92-31 Disposition of original record. A photograph, microphotograph, reproduction on film, or electronic form of a government record shall be placed in conveniently accessible files and provisions made for preserving, examining, and using the same. Thereafter, a public officer, after having first received the written approval of the comptroller as provided in section 94-3, may cause such record, paper, or document to be destroyed. The comptroller may require, as a prerequisite to the granting of such approval, that a reproduction or print of such photograph, microphotograph, or reproduction on film, or electronic form of the record be delivered into the custody of the public archives for safekeeping. The comptroller may also require the delivery into the custody of another governmental department or agency or a research library of any such record, paper, or document proposed to be destroyed under the provisions of this section.
So, either the original microfiche copy is still available or a complete reproduction of it in electronic form is available. To put something in electronic form and not copy all the data on the original document would be against the law. Where these files have to be accessible and provisions have to be made for examining them, it would be misleading for the Department of Health to say that the information on the original Certificate of Live Birth is no longer available. Under Hawaii Revised Stautes 338-18, those with a direct and tangible interest in the record are permitted inspection of public health statistics records. That would include either the microfiche or electronic copy of the original Certificate of Live Birth.
The story has Mrs. Nordyke reciting the certificate numbers, as if she had them all memorized ... even Obama’s, which is inexplicably higher than her daughters’. The paper quotes her as saying that she must have gone into labor before Obama’s mama so her daughters got earlier certificate numbers. This isn’t how it’s done. They don’t give out certificate numbers before babies are born ... obviously because they don’t know if they’ll have a live birth or not. Babies that are stillborn would get a death certificate, with a completely different numbering system ... plus the numbers are given out by the state when the completed certificates are filed with the registrar. Obama’s was filed three days before the Nordyke certificates, so there’s no way he can have a higher number than they do.
“If someone can contact her while she is still coherent (she is now 82 ! ) and inquire as to when she obtained these birth certificates, it would contradict the State if HI’s new claim that all of the original records were destroyed !”
What would it be needed to contact anyone to find out when they were issued? It is stated right on the documents that they were issued 5-5-1966.
Also when WND first posted this story last year, it was stated that Mrs. Nordike never claimed that she had any personal knowledge about Obama’s birth.
No doubt Hawaii did destroy documents, although they now claim they didn’t. Look at Okubo’s statement, “We have not destroyed any vital statistics records that we have.” Any idiot would understand that you couldn’t have destroyed records, if you still have them. However, she didn’t say they didn’t destroy any records, did she? It is this kind of dishonest double talk from the HDOH which offers more questions than answers.
bump
” he mentions it in his book while discussing going through some old papers).”
Actually, he was rifling though his grandmother’s private belongings when he was 17 and discovered his birth certificate.
And the long interview with BHO Sr, where his father oddly made no mention of a wife or new baby.
The sneak was probably looking to steal money to buy drugs or booze .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.