Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I just encountered this when seeking some information via Scroogle.

We'll know in a week or so whether or not we lose another chunk of what makes the Internet, and it's users, special.

Any idea where else we can go to preserve privacy in searches?

*******************************************

I did a search and found nothing.

I hope I've posted this in the right area.

Admin/Mods: If I've misplaced this, please place it where suitable by your standards, and accept my apologies.

CA....

1 posted on 05/10/2010 10:54:33 PM PDT by Chances Are
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Chances Are; ShadowAce; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Ping.


2 posted on 05/10/2010 10:55:46 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

Damn. Now it’s back to Startpage and Ixquick..


3 posted on 05/10/2010 11:09:03 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

Enjoy what’s left of the Internet.

The communists are tightening their grip.


4 posted on 05/10/2010 11:25:33 PM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

https://ixquick.com/


5 posted on 05/10/2010 11:28:23 PM PDT by glock rocks (Wait, what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

Dang, and I had just found Scroogle, too! :(


6 posted on 05/10/2010 11:36:34 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

I must be getting old, because I have no idea what Scroogle or a “scraper” is.


7 posted on 05/10/2010 11:40:53 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are
This is what they are looking for I remember playing with that page when Google first started:
www.google.com/ie cashed

I looked around couldn't find it.

8 posted on 05/10/2010 11:44:27 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

That hacks me off. I switched to Scroogle a few months ago and loved it. WTH? This seems to be not just a ‘simple’ change but a targeted attack (imo) but I’m not savvy regarding the nuances of the tech world. I just use what’s there. I won’t go back to Google; no privacy and we’ve been told never to expect it and we don’t have a ‘right’ to it.

Their no doubt in bed with the current marxists.


9 posted on 05/10/2010 11:46:34 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Control the American people? Herding cats would be easier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

looks like the google monster is concerned about “ITS” privacy.

I liked scroogle.


13 posted on 05/10/2010 11:59:43 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

Well, I did a search since I have never used the site (web guy since 1993) and what they seem to do would tick me off if I was Google.

They are taking away Google’s ad revenues or did I miss what they do completely?

If I took DrudgeReport and stripped away all ads and news links and pushed it out, wouldn’t that seem wrong?

For secrecy, use anonomizer and you shouldn’t have an issue.


18 posted on 05/11/2010 1:03:13 AM PDT by wireplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

Big Brother is watching.


19 posted on 05/11/2010 1:20:36 AM PDT by exnavy (May the Lord grant our troops protection and endurance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are
I posted this to slashdot.org. If you have an account there, please vote on my story submission so it will make it to the front page. http://slashdot.org/submission/1234560/Scroogle-has-been-blocked-and-may-be-retired
20 posted on 05/11/2010 1:27:42 AM PDT by joseph20 (...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

Also, as an alternative to using scroogle (while it is down), use google with Firefox with the Tor Button enabled.


21 posted on 05/11/2010 1:29:38 AM PDT by joseph20 (...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are
I was looking around and I found this: https://us2.startpage.com/.

It's a privacy-oriented search service.
22 posted on 05/11/2010 1:38:53 AM PDT by joseph20 (...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are
Scroogle has been blocked!

Damn!

25 posted on 05/11/2010 3:02:03 AM PDT by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are
Scroogle was run by leftists anyway. There was never any good reason to think they treated your data any better than Google.

Famlisearch

27 posted on 05/11/2010 3:08:25 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

We use GoodSearch... they utilize the Yahoo engine and they share some of the adv revenue with your favorite charity. We’ve added both of our kids’ schools over the years and gained some monies for them. The real rewards come from clicking through them to online retailers - just for that ‘portal’ click-through the retailer kicks in a percent of the merchandise sale to your charity. Something to consider.


30 posted on 05/11/2010 3:59:54 AM PDT by TedLee ("Self government without self control will not work")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are; ShadowAce; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Jaguar; max americana; Boucheau; glock rocks; ...
An observation that seems ironic to me:

This is the same google that supports net neutrality. As they censor certain websites.

So all of us are supposed to believe that google requires the federal government to impose net neutrality in order to stop google from censoring?

That doesn't add up. Doesn't pass the smell test. I'm sure most of us can see through this.

31 posted on 05/11/2010 4:17:06 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Net Neutrality - I say a lot of un-neutral things. How about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

Guess I’m in the minority.

Sure Google is leftist, and should be avoided. But Scroogle (which I wasn’t aware of until just now) seems to simply piggyback on ... Google.

Why is it Google’s responsibility to cater to another company, which could arguably be described as a competitor?

If Scroogle is so fabulous, perhaps someone who feels that way should help them with funding, in order to build their own proprietary search engine - and take Google on for real.

Otherwise they’re sort of like pilot fish, living off a whale.

Not the whale’s responsibility, when you get right down to it.

One word: Ixquick.


41 posted on 05/11/2010 5:47:14 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Palin / Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chances Are

After all these years now I understand Scroogle’s name!
Google+scraper=Scroogle!

Learn sumpin new everyday!


42 posted on 05/11/2010 5:50:45 AM PDT by ozark hilljilly (When will you have enough, Mr. Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson