Unless the mother was abusing this girl, I’m with Mom. Why do I think daddy has a lot of money and connectionbs??
Do you have information on this case other than the article posted. It didn’t give any details at all about the custody of the girl. I was just wondering how you came to your conclusion.
Naturally. The man is always the bad guy. Duh! That Bishop lady that shot up a bunch of professors in Alabama only did that because of some MAN. (eyes rolling)
What had the father done to this girl to make the mother want to do such a thing. If he didn't do anything then mom deserves to be in jail for parental interference and kidnapping.
If I were on the jury, I'd be leaning that direction; and I'd hope the girl's story would matter most.
If the sexes were reversed, and dad took the daughter away from custodial mom, I'm betting you're the type who would want dad to get life in prison.
Not much info yet -
WALNUT CREEK, Calif.—A young woman abducted more than 14 years ago has been found, and her mother is in jail, suspected of the crime.
Dean Click told police that his daughter, Jessica Click-Hill, went missing on Sept. 2, 1995. He believed she may have been taken by his wife, Wendy Hill. A warrant was issued for Wendy Hill’s arrest in 1996, but she disappeared.
The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children contacted law enforcement eight months ago with a tip, saying the young woman, now 22, might be in Monrovia, Los Angeles County.
Police found Jessica Click-Hill, and arrested Wendy Hill. She was booked Thursday morning into County Jail in Martinez. Her bail was set at $250,000.
Oh really? Even if its more likely that he had visitation rights and she hated him so much for the usual reasons that she thought she could hurt him most severely by not allowing him to see his own daughter grow up ?
You dont know the facts, but you assume the worst? Pathetic misandry.
Yea, no matter that mom had a federal warrant for unlawful flight to avoid prosecution out against her since 1997, eh? Mother always knows best, I guess.
What difference would dad’s connections and money make if she unlawfully took the child in the first place.
But, apparently you are good with moms unlawfully fleeing their husbands with their children, even absent fact number one about the case.
Would your husband have given up the search for his children had you absconded with them unlawfully? I know I wouldn’t.
Do you have any idea how difficult it is to express this without anger?
Family courts are a Gynocracy. We should do to the judges who have enabled this Gynocracy what the Romanians did to Ceausescu.
I’ve been parentally kidnapped. Absolutely no excuse for it, unless the mother truly was saving her daughter from abuse, and not just in her warped mind.
Father’s money and connections are irrelevant.
Soooooo....still no mea culpa?