Sick of the "birthers" being the du jour whipping post (Beck, O'Reilly, even Palin did not defend)

You know, I've just about had it with Mr. 'Due Diligence', Mr "Research your brains out', Glenn Beck --mercilessly going after the genuine questions about Obama's veiled past as "lunatic", fringe, insane--including the MIA birth certificate and the missing, contradictory and veiled Obama personal, professional and academic records.

He and O'Reilly are beginning to protest too damn much...the TRUTH of the matter is that there are LEGION of murky questions surroundiong Obama. It is conspicuously bizarre the way they are behaving about it--overdoing the "hostility", the ridicule.

Since Beck is so quick to castigate and dismiss the so-called much maligned, "birthers"---then PROVE it is nonsense with real hard core data and info--debunk the swirl with counter-evidence--answer the gaps--let's see one of his famous research shows on this 'raging through the underground' topic, eh?

Also the evidence is pretty convincing that he never attended Columbia as he claimed.

There has been some very astute and indeed fair minded enquiries here on FR regarding the President's time at or not time at Columbia.

It is only fair to say that there is a fair amount of evidence that he was. A person of some worth came forward and says he roomed with Barack for one semester. He recounted the hard scrabble times with accommodation. He supplied photographs of Barack in those walk ups. Student crash pads. No real proof of course. A telling proof was of an article in a now defunct campus newspaper by one Barack. On reading the article, I exclaimed "My God, they've got him!" I meant the activist Marxists.

I hope you will bear with me at what seems to be nay saying. The real question is just what time did Barack spend at Columbia? The other questions are where are his transcripts and what was the proper demands on his academic performance? Added to that is just what time did he spend there?

Persons claim that at Harvard yet, he did not seem to participate very much, yet he got a degree.

The murky business of his past life must be disturbing to even the most avid Democrats, who are thinkers.

wow. That is great. I guess he must have released his records.

If that's all that will convince you, then I'm afraid you're going to be disappointed. I just don't see any reason to believe he didn't attend Columbia. If you believe this, then you're basically saying they just gave him a diploma, which doesn't make any sense.

I am also tired of Bek and O'Reilly attacking birth story. Both are no longer "not" paying attention and seem to be developing an attack angle on birthers. Remember when they never noticed the birthers at first? Now, they go out of their way to take notice.

O'Reilly tried his best to force Palin to discount birther claims. I dont think she really did take the whole bait like PostEmail claims.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.