Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Endorses Ashley GrahAMNESTY; Gives $1K to Israel-Hater (Debbie Schlussel Alert)
Debbie Schlussel ^ | 2/01/2010 | Debbie Schlussel

Posted on 02/01/2010 9:58:19 PM PST by goldstategop

Over the last couple of weeks, a number of readers asked me what I thought about Sarah Palin supporting and actively campaigning for amnesty, global warming theory, and “I would close Gitmo” Republican, John McCain. That, I can understand, since he’s the moron who idiotically catapulted the empty skirtsuit to fame in the first place.

That said, it’s not just McCain. The Sarah PAC also gave $1,000 to Team Graham, the campaign committee of amnesty supporter and “don’t torture terrorists” Republican U.S. Senator Ashley Graham, whom Rush Limbaugh appropriately calls, “Ashley Grahamnesty.” And her support is specifically for his primary.

And then there’s her support of Rand Paul, which many readers (including Shy Guy) have also contacted me about. Yup, the son of Ron Paul. While I don’t know if Paul espouses the 9/11 Truther and other wacky rhetoric (some of it anti-Israel and anti-American) of his bizarro father, it’s usually the case that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

(Excerpt) Read more at debbieschlussel.com ...


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister; Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: antisemitic; antisemitism; chillout; debbieschlussel; emptysuit; graham; paul; pds; randisnotantisemitic; rino; rinocentral; rinos; troll; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-230 next last
To: firebrand

To be frank, that’s the way it has to be done Constitutionally.

The proper question is to ask whether he thinks ‘Authorization for Military Force’ that Congress gave to Bush for Afghanistan and Iraq are equivalent to a declaration of war.


201 posted on 02/02/2010 8:13:47 AM PST by Ultra Sonic 007 (To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Lilpug15

For some, there is an agenda. For others, I think they just never trusted her judgment in the first place.

I’ve noticed that most fall under a specific category of type of Conservative, mostly defined by who they support. They are the my way or the highway types.


202 posted on 02/02/2010 8:37:49 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

chuckle..maybe shouldn’t post when I’m sleepy?


203 posted on 02/02/2010 8:39:40 AM PST by Mamzelle (Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
Military action only permitted if Congress declares war.

Actually not, there are three ways outlined in Article 1 Section 8 that can be used to authorize the use of force by the military.

1. To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;

2. To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;

3. To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;

204 posted on 02/02/2010 8:40:44 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

you need to wake the hell up, or get off FR. Troll.


205 posted on 02/02/2010 8:53:51 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! Just vote them OUT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
Donations do not equate an endorsement.

What do they mean then? If you people wish to promote Sarah Palin you might consider:

* not making blatantly inane statements (such as "donations do not equate an endorsement")

* throwing a fecking collective hissy fit any time Palin is critiqued.

If Palin has a downfall, it may very well occur not because of herself but rather on account of people becoming repulsed by a lot of those supporting her who seem to be on an emotional maturity level with the average teen.

206 posted on 02/02/2010 8:58:44 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Debbie should unwad her panties, they’re cutting off the circulation to her brain.


207 posted on 02/02/2010 9:11:19 AM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla
What do they mean then?

Exactly what it is, a transfer of funds. People are reading in an endorsement when, frankly, we don't know what it is. For all we know, it is simply a refund of donations but done this way to maximize tax benefits and ease the transaction. The fact is we don't know and so assumptions are exactly that assumptions.

I'm not happy about the McCain endorsement and am mixed on the Paul one (he isn't his father and a lot of good folks like Steve Forbes endorsed him), however, the fact is Palin is not Jesus. I am not going to agree with everything she does but right now, she represents our values more than most other potential candidates out there.

208 posted on 02/02/2010 9:11:34 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn

I think that everyone should be reminded that Debbie Schlussel is the queen of knee jerk reactions. She started the bogus Rachael Ray ‘scarf’ controversy, she has attacked Conservatives left and right, and if you look at the history of her articles here, she is normally just taking the opposite approach of FReepers.

http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Afreerepublic.com+Debbie+Schlussel+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a


209 posted on 02/02/2010 9:15:07 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: All

All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2385966/posts


210 posted on 02/02/2010 9:16:57 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

It’s an honest question. But if you can’t explain it, then maybe your head is spinning.


211 posted on 02/02/2010 9:18:07 AM PST by ABQHispConservative (A good Blue Dog is an unelected Blue Dog. Ditto Rino's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

But, wow, this article is more than a knee jerk. It’s a hit piece. What’s a skirt got to do with anything? These things ooze female jealousy and maybe a bit of anger because Sarah is also a mom and a wife. They’re elitist feminists who despise that Sarah can be folksy and down-to-earth and talk about her kids. I think that’s what steaming her drawers. Conservative or no.


212 posted on 02/02/2010 9:20:39 AM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn

Very true, can’t argue with that at all. Debbie has always seemed to have a burr in her butt about Palin.


213 posted on 02/02/2010 9:23:21 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; goldstategop; Jim Robinson

Oh, you’re kidding! Isn’t this spamming? If it ain’t it oughta be.


214 posted on 02/02/2010 9:23:25 AM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007; onyx
I believe that when we must fight, we declare war as the Constitution mandates

It's right there in Reply 84, kindly provided by onyx.

215 posted on 02/02/2010 9:37:09 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

See my Reply 215 above. I know this is what many people believe. A mask for isolationism, IMO.


216 posted on 02/02/2010 9:40:59 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: jla; wtc911; goldstategop; upsdriver; ABQHispConservative
What do they mean then? If you people wish to promote Sarah Palin you might consider: * not making blatantly inane statements (such as "donations do not equate an endorsement")

So in your reality Palin has made her endorsement for the 2014 race, by returning a 1000 dollars to Graham 8 months after his 2008 election, to a six year term? You might want to look into political endorsements some, that isn't how they are done,that is why this is pure troll stuff.

217 posted on 02/02/2010 10:07:10 AM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; Jim Robinson

Posting these inflammatory troll threads and then refusing to respond to posts, makes it impossible for us to engage you in any manner, which makes this a one sided, unanswered attack by you and an effective but dishonest trolling strategy.


218 posted on 02/02/2010 10:16:24 AM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla
What do they mean then? If you people wish to promote Sarah Palin you might consider:

* not making blatantly inane statements (such as "donations do not equate an endorsement")

* throwing a fecking collective hissy fit any time Palin is critiqued.

If Palin has a downfall, it may very well occur not because of herself but rather on account of people becoming repulsed by a lot of those supporting her who seem to be on an emotional maturity level with the average teen.

Inane? What was inane about my comment?

A hissy fit? How you come to all those conclusions from my six word post is amazing!

As for emotional maturity, I would contend that those with a hatred towards Palin are the emotionally retarded among us. That goes for the hatred displayed for any other candidate for that matter. It isn't helpful. Makes it kind of tough to vote for someone in the general election you trashed during the primaries. My enemy is the Democrats not less than perfect Republicans.

I have no problem with critiquing so go for it. I do have a problem with political correctness no matter who practices it.

219 posted on 02/02/2010 11:24:39 AM PST by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; goldstategop
you need to wake the hell up, or get off FR. Troll.

Ouch. That's gonna leave a mark.

220 posted on 02/02/2010 12:04:17 PM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson