Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

where is all this water supposed to come from?
1 posted on 01/18/2010 2:47:34 PM PST by Former MSM Viewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Former MSM Viewer

One gallon equals 0.1336806 cubic feet.


2 posted on 01/18/2010 2:49:10 PM PST by lacrew (The 274th trimester is a very late procedure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

Antarctica has about 7 million cubic miles of ice. That’s 7.7 quintillion gallons.


3 posted on 01/18/2010 2:50:41 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Gore is the fifth horseman of the apocalypse. He rides an icy horse bringing cold wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

Yall have too much time on your hands. :o)


4 posted on 01/18/2010 2:50:48 PM PST by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

Good Question for Algore.


5 posted on 01/18/2010 2:50:55 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

I’m still trying to figure out how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop.


7 posted on 01/18/2010 2:52:41 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

I think that a large fraction of the rise is supposeed to come from thermal expansion of seawater.


8 posted on 01/18/2010 2:52:55 PM PST by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer
Taking the exact opposite tack -- people have worked out a fairly simple plan to build a canal from the Mediterranean to the Quattara Depression (in Libya). Any rise in sea level (although, as you point out, any such rise seems unlikely), but any such rise which did occur could be easily sent out into the depression where it would quickly evaporate. Substantial hydro-electric power could be generated as well.

Basically, no sensible person should worry about any rise in sea levels. It ain't gonna happen.

9 posted on 01/18/2010 2:53:34 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (We have the 1st so that we can call on people to rebel. We have 2nd so that they can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

one acre foot equals 325851.428571 gallons. You do the math.


10 posted on 01/18/2010 2:53:56 PM PST by dblshot (T.V. - Why do you think they call it programming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

Less than one if you can figure out how to measure it!


11 posted on 01/18/2010 2:54:39 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

****** “ where is all this water supposed to come from? “ *****

At a dollar a gallon 0bama and Algore could find it

TT


12 posted on 01/18/2010 2:54:55 PM PST by TexasTransplant (Parse every sentence uttered by a politician)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

Treat the sq miles of the oceans as the area of a circle and then use the volume of cylinder to raise the height of the oceans to any measurement you want.

I did this a few weeks ago. For instance, for the world oceans to rise 6 inches, it would take 216 Greenlands to completely melt.


13 posted on 01/18/2010 2:55:20 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

so apparently every ice cube, frost, snow, and glacier on Earth would have to melt?


14 posted on 01/18/2010 2:55:42 PM PST by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

Don’t forget, as the oceans rise, even by 1 foot, the 140,000,000 sq miles of oceans will increase.


15 posted on 01/18/2010 2:55:44 PM PST by vamoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

How much explosives would it take to lower an island?


17 posted on 01/18/2010 2:58:44 PM PST by SkyDancer (I Believe In The Law Until It Interferes With Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

Why bother? If the caps melt, the weight of the water will be spread over the whole ocean (9/10ths of the earth’s surface) instead of the caps. The caps will rebound from the weight removal while the cean floor will be more compressed from the weight addition. End result; no change in the height of the oceans.

PS: The glacial areas are STILL rebounding upwards after the loss of the weight of the last glacier that covered the area.


18 posted on 01/18/2010 2:58:48 PM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer
If you take the ice caps (non-floating) of Greenland and Antarctica, do the math on water having less volume than ice, assume no increase in atmospheric water. You come up with about 37 feet of ice that needs to melt off of the entire areas to increase the seas by 1 foot.

Now, if you look at Antarctica, you will find that most of the continent never gets anywhere close to 32 degrees. With that in mind, how does warming Antarctica from -5 to -4 or even -1, melt the ice cap?

21 posted on 01/18/2010 3:04:32 PM PST by SampleMan (No one should die on a gov. waiting list., or go broke because the gov. has dictated their salary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer
Presumably, if the sea level rises, that increases the water surface of the earth exposed to the sun. Q. If the sea level rises, will there necessarily be more evaporation of the sea surface? if so, then would there be more atmospheric moisture? if so, would the additional atmospheric moisture act to cool the surface of the planet? if so, would the arctics pile up ice again reducing the sea level to where it once was? if so, is the earth's climate self regulating? No I don't know earth sciences very well, but what would physics imply or even equate.
22 posted on 01/18/2010 3:07:46 PM PST by dps.inspect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

The forgotten item in all these calculations is that most of the ice is floating on water displacing the same amount of water by weight as it weighs. Ice is less dense than water if it were not then the bottoms of lakes would freeze first killing al the fish. When ice melts the water level stays the same. Check it out with a brimful glass of ice water.


24 posted on 01/18/2010 3:08:20 PM PST by scottteng (IMPEACH OBAMA I am Jim Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

Also remember Ice has more volume than water. So, as it melts, it will result in a lesser amount of liquid water by about 8%. (Mass density of ice is .92 g/ml vs 1 g/ml for water)


25 posted on 01/18/2010 3:10:31 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former MSM Viewer

Ask the makers of the movie Waterworld.


27 posted on 01/18/2010 3:24:45 PM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson