Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Count: Warner’s Playoff Brilliance Continues
WSJ ^ | 1/11/10 | Carl Bialik

Posted on 01/11/2010 4:41:46 PM PST by pissant

In between being intercepted on the first play of the game and stripped of the ball on the last play, Aaron Rodgers was terrific in the best game of the NFL’s wild-card weekend. But Kurt Warner was better — historically good. He completed 29 of 33 passes for 379 yards, five touchdowns and no interceptions, with a 154.1 passer rating. It was, by at least one measure, one of the two best playoff performances by a quarterback in history.

Before Warner’s big game, 10 other quarterbacks in the last 50 years had a passer rating above 150. But nine of those QBs did so in a game in which they threw 25 or fewer passes for fewer than 300 yards. It’s easier to sustain that level of play when given fewer opportunities to mess up. Warner threw 33 times, while his team ran the ball just 23 times. The only other QB to sustain such a high level of excellence over more than 25 attempts in a playoff game was Peyton Manning, who completed 22 of 26 passes for 377 yards and five touchdowns, with no picks, against Denver in 2004. (Manning and Warner also have the only two other playoff games with at least 310 yards and a rating of 140 or higher.) The passer rating, incidentally, doesn’t account for sacks, but both QBs were excellent at eluding the rush — Warner was sacked just once for four yards, while Manning wasn’t sacked at all. Rodgers on Sunday exhibited his characteristic reluctance to throw the ball under pressure, taking five sacks and fumbling on that game-deciding play.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: arizonacardinals; kurtwarner; nfl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Brilliant performances by Warner and Rodgers
1 posted on 01/11/2010 4:41:50 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

The NFL sucks but I like Kurt Warner.


2 posted on 01/11/2010 4:43:11 PM PST by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I’m a huge Warner fan but damnit! GB had that game in the bag. We always lose these last-second thrillers. ROFL


3 posted on 01/11/2010 4:45:13 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (GO GREEN BAY PACKERS GO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I’m hoping he gets past the Aints and meets the Vikes for the NFC Championship. A 38 year old versus a 40 year old QB.


4 posted on 01/11/2010 4:45:23 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Warner was outstanding. I really hope the Cards win the Super Bowl.


5 posted on 01/11/2010 4:47:31 PM PST by rabidralph ("Precedenting" is a lot tougher than community organizing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Whatta great game. A shame there had to be a loser.


6 posted on 01/11/2010 4:50:21 PM PST by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

A classic NFL barn-burner.


7 posted on 01/11/2010 4:51:57 PM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Exactly. The Geezer’ Bowl. Kurt is playing lights out’ football but Drew Brees ain’t no spring chicken either. More interested in watching Favre vs Homo though..


8 posted on 01/11/2010 4:56:06 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Any pro quarterback can have a Hall of Fame game when there is no defense.


9 posted on 01/11/2010 4:58:26 PM PST by 1raider1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I love Kurt Warner and always have....

Rodgers was brilliant as well.....he did get a head to helmet hit just before the play where he was face masked and fumbled....

I feel bad that it was not called.

so you Green Bay fans hang in there....you got a good one...

and Kurt....you're my dream qb.....

10 posted on 01/11/2010 4:58:57 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1raider1

Packers were ranked #2 in the NFL


11 posted on 01/11/2010 5:00:23 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The only reason the Cardinals won was because the referees refused to call a 15 yard face-masking penalty that would have given the Packers a first down instead of the Cardinals scoring the winning TD. Two plays earlier they ignored another 15 personal foul. The Cardinals didn’t win..the refs handed it to them.

Warner and Rodgers were incredible.


12 posted on 01/11/2010 5:01:27 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("Anyone pushing Romney must love socialism...Piss on Romney and his enablers!!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I'm not a Cards fan, but damn, that Warner can sling the ball. I almost kinda hope he pulls an Elway and goes out on top, if all the retirement talk has any legs. What a great game. And to think the guy was stocking supermarket shelves at one point. And I can see Rogers sporting a ring in the future, too - the backs of his ears have barely started to dry off after getting out from behind Farve's shadow, and he's already making good things happen.


13 posted on 01/11/2010 5:01:52 PM PST by Viking2002 (Old fishermen never die. They just smell that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

It was some game!

Someone suggested that covered stadiums favor the offense. That makes sense to me. Removing random elements like gusts of wind, looking into the sun, etc. should allow an offense to hone their game. Covered stadiums are more common now than in the past and this may throw off historical comparisons between quarterbacks.


14 posted on 01/11/2010 5:04:44 PM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress. What is it today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

What a joke. They quit calling incidental facemasks 2 years ago. And that is what it was. They also ignored a late hit on Warner and an interference call against one of the packer DBs. So the bad ref’n was equal opportunity.


15 posted on 01/11/2010 5:05:36 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Warner was very good against a very good Steelers team (last year?? I forget). Big Ben was just too tough and I think the Cards had a call go against them.

Yeah Warner and Farve are the only thing of any interest in the NFL cause it sucks. NFL is pro-Obama and anti-Limbaugh. Warner and Farve playing at these levels at their ages is staggering. Warner in the last super bowl looked fitter and leaner plus younger than he had been looking when he played for the Rams.


16 posted on 01/11/2010 5:09:07 PM PST by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

It was an ideal matchup and both teams played it for keeps. The refs were inconsistent in my opinion but wow. I’m glad my team GB has Rodgers.


17 posted on 01/11/2010 5:09:28 PM PST by februus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Uh, they allowed 51 points. Well, not exactly. I’ll give you that some of AZ’s points were scored on GB’s offense, but come on, that score was ridiculous.


18 posted on 01/11/2010 5:15:17 PM PST by 1raider1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1raider1

Yes. I know. But this wasn’t the Seahawks they were playing. The pack was rated #2 in D coming in.


19 posted on 01/11/2010 5:17:39 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Warner


20 posted on 01/11/2010 5:24:51 PM PST by packrat35 (Democrat Healthcare is a 9-11 Attack on the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson