Posted on 12/24/2009 10:34:48 AM PST by civilwar2
The battle that birthed our great nation was a battle well worth waging. Our founders declared that "taxation without representation" was unacceptable. So much so that men risked fortune, injury and even life in fighting a revolutionary war to break free from tyranny.
Two-hundred thirty five years later, our nation finds itself facing a new tyranny – legislation without representation. Are there Americans willing to fight this time to break free again?
Regardless of which poll one reads, the majority of Americans are clearly opposed to the health-care bill in its current form. As few as 52 percent and as many as 70 perent of Americans have said "no." Yet 220 representatives in the House and now 60 representatives in the Senate have voted "yes."
Is that what this group of politicians deems "representative" of the will of the people?
If so, I am thoroughly convinced we have all the elements in place to spark the second American Revolution – a war that must be fought for the principles of a government "of the people, by the people and for the people."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
That, or Romanian style. I’m not going to complain about the particular method.
Are you ready to push daiseys if someone thinks you’re the problem?
As soon as the gubment starts putting people in jail for free speech violation etc.
That’s the when. It’s really that simple.
Stay tuned.
B4 the gun thing a few burning tires at strategic lacations, alot of fireworks, whistles, and mostly motivated patriots.
If there is no effect....
We already have muslim nut cases killing our troops and LEO’s, we may as well add to the mix!
Merry Christmas!
Me, I’m not fussy. Either will do. But there’s something about a public hanging that would certainly prove instructional to the rest of these vermin.
Nope! I'm very hard to satisfy! LOL! Merry Christmas!
The point I'm trying to make is that Communists and Fascists never back down an inch without being brutally defeated.
If you talk to some of the many Americans or US residents who lived under tyranny, they will tell you that they saw it coming since 0b0z0 beat Clinton in the primaries.
What's astonishing, they'll tell you, is the speed of the takeover and the makeover, which is unprecedented even through military coups!
Maybe we should take note of others' experiences since, thank God, we don't have some of our own dating back to the British times.
What kills me is just about everything they have done in the last year could (or should) have been challenged in the courts immediately. Where are these challenges?
I’m sorry.
As of today dec. 24 2009 I will be armed at all times.
Yes , having been in war I do know the logistics will be a problem. But I figure those who don’t want in on the fight will feed and clothe the rest of us.
Communications tops the list.
We must win the battle of ideas: www.offgridblogger.wordpress.com.
“As of today dec. 24 2009 I will be armed at all times.”
Well that is a good idea for many reasons in our times.
Have a great Christmas!
A better question would be; what courts? The lib judges would vindicate them or simply rule; no standing!
It’s a challenge I know.
Have a great Christmas!
Fine, then after we throw them out of office, we still need to hunt them down like dogs for the treasonous acts committed while in office. It is what used to be called accountability.
>Oh please RP is nuttier than a rat turd in a pistachio factory. Find a better standard beraer for oyur message.
Maybe so, but he DOES have some good Constitutional arguments for a lot of his stances. Take his stance that [oversimplified] marijuana shouldn’t be federally illegalized; the Constitution does not provide for the war on drugs, and in fact Prohibition required a Constitutional Amendment to make alcohol illegal on the national level. No such amendment exists even remotely legitimizing the war on drugs.
(I am not advocating drug use; however I am making a point: that to nationally prohibit a substance [namely alcohol] a Constitutional amendment was needed.)
Furthermore, his stance regarding the illegitimacy of the Federal Reserve is spot on; the Constitution authorizes ONLY the minting of Gold and/or Silver for monies, not copper, nickel, iron, or paper. {And if we had a solidly-backed money, the Dollar would not be so weak right now... just look at the price of Gold.}
BTTT
Why?
Because we scare.
I wrote that check in 1965...It stands.
24 December 2009
This date will be remembered!
Never Forget what the democrates have done to all taxpayers on this day.
On 25 December 2009, a day that already lives in infamy, shall be a call to all to defend the freedom that our fathers fought for!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.