Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tiger Woods’ Wife Elin 'Wants Half His Fortune' as She Prepares to Meet Divorce Lawyers
The Daily Mirror (UK) ^ | 12/16/09 | Ryan Parry

Posted on 12/15/2009 6:23:37 PM PST by marshmallow

Tiger Woods’ devastated wife has called in California’s top celebrity divorce lawyer, say her friends.

And Elin Nordegren – rocked by her husband’s string of alleged affairs – could get half the £337.5million he has earned in the five years they have been married.

The 29-year-old Swedish model, seen out in Florida yesterday minus her wedding ring, is believed to be meeting celebrity lawyer Sorrell Trope next week.

Trope, 82, a partner in Californian law firm Trope and Trope, has represented big-name stars including Cary Grant, Nicole Kidman, Nicolas Cage and Britney Spears in a 60-year career.

And in another blow to Woods, Elin is believed to be planning to file for divorce in California – where the couple have a home – and not Florida, where they live.

Under California law the “no-fault divorce”, introduced in 1970, means there is an equal division of assets and property.

This could mean that any pre-nup agreement Elin signed with the golf star will be torn up.

A source said: “Mr Trope is the best divorce lawyer in the business and the divorce laws in California are much more favourable than most other states.

“Elin can fight for half of what her husband has earned since they were married. And Trope can bust through any pre-nup – he’s done it many times before.”

Last night, when asked if he was representing Woods’ wife as her divorce lawyer, Trope replied: “Not right now.”

Friends say Elin will spend Christmas in Orlando with the couple’s children, daughter Sam Alexis, two, and son Charlie Axel, 10 months, before filing for divorce in the New Year.

(Excerpt) Read more at mirror.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Sports
KEYWORDS: cheater; cheetawoods; divorce; payback; tiger; tigerwoods
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-263 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2009 6:23:40 PM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
If Elin wins half of Tiger's fortune, I expect John Kerry to come a' courtin' her soon afterwards...

Cheers!

2 posted on 12/15/2009 6:29:25 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“The Lady and/or the Tiger”


3 posted on 12/15/2009 6:29:59 PM PST by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

If this is true, I hope Tiger divides the number of women he has slept with since marrying her and rings that up as the amount he paid for each woman. The big question is. Were they worth it Tiger? (of course we haven’t even calculate the emotional cost to the children.)


4 posted on 12/15/2009 6:30:02 PM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

That was some expensive tail that Tiger got himself.

Hope it was worth it.


5 posted on 12/15/2009 6:30:58 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (A Jimmy Carter got us a Ronald Reagan.....a Barack Obama will get us a Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

If she wants half the money, she should have played and won half the tournaments that Tiger won, instead of him.

She should get something reasonable plus of course a lot of child support, but it is unrealistic to claim that she contributed to half of the earnings by Tiger.


6 posted on 12/15/2009 6:31:37 PM PST by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Greedy _itch!


7 posted on 12/15/2009 6:32:00 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Hell hath no fury....

But WTF does a state get to invalidate a contract between two parties?


8 posted on 12/15/2009 6:33:52 PM PST by misterrob (A society that burdens future generations with debt can not be considered moral or just)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Hell hath no fury....

But WTF does a state get to invalidate a contract between two parties?


9 posted on 12/15/2009 6:33:55 PM PST by misterrob (A society that burdens future generations with debt can not be considered moral or just)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

So it was always about the money. Now we know...


10 posted on 12/15/2009 6:35:03 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
"Under California law the “no-fault divorce”, introduced in 1970, means there is an equal division of assets and property. "

That's not what it means. Don't these journalist have lawyers that they consult?

FL is a "equitable distribution", not a community property state. The division of assets in FL is not an automatic 50/50 split, although that's possible, but VERY unlikely in a marriage under 5 years. Also, Tiger I'm sure has a prenup. If his attorneys exposed him to liability in excess of $50 million in a prenup, then his attorneys are incompetent. Believe me, his attorneys aren't incompetent.

11 posted on 12/15/2009 6:35:53 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I doubt it with their prenup


12 posted on 12/15/2009 6:36:38 PM PST by GeronL (Join the Palin Beer Summit Putsch!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Elin is endanger from going from a very sympathetic figure to being a gold digger. This is a terrible PR move.


13 posted on 12/15/2009 6:36:47 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet
“Were they worth it Tiger?”

Except for the hookers they all seemed like skanks who were used to giving it away.

14 posted on 12/15/2009 6:37:14 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn; marshmallow

Hate to break it to you, but his money was mostly earned in advertising. The value of his name was increased by his “wholesome, family image” that he cultivated by marrying and having children.


15 posted on 12/15/2009 6:37:59 PM PST by republicangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

She went into the marriage assuming that it would be a monogamous relationship. She should get at least half of his fortune and the kids as well.


16 posted on 12/15/2009 6:38:18 PM PST by doc1019 (Obama, not so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
"But WTF does a state get to invalidate a contract between two parties"

Some state case law (and even statutory law) makes it possible to sue to amend, or even invalidate (although that's rare) prenups. This is most frequently seen in circumstances of domestic violence. I would think that FL isn't much different in this regard, although I'm not precisely sure what the law in that state with respect to this issue.

17 posted on 12/15/2009 6:38:41 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

And she did what to deserve that money? Family court is such a gynocracy in this country.


18 posted on 12/15/2009 6:39:05 PM PST by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

But, but, but how will he pay for all his whores?


19 posted on 12/15/2009 6:39:10 PM PST by GOPJ (Journalists as BaghdadBobLite - Global Warming Scientists as ElmerGantry - what's happening?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

One article stated the pre-nup am’t. to be $300 mil.


20 posted on 12/15/2009 6:40:11 PM PST by Natural Born 54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson