Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitutional Convention 1791 Founding Fathers deemed unfair by 6th grade social studies teacher

Posted on 12/01/2009 9:00:48 PM PST by celticchik

I am having an email argument/discussion with my son's social studies teacher. He distributed a study guide about how unfair it was that the founding fathers at the Constitutional Convention did not include African Americans, Native Americans, women and poor people. I discussed with my son who is 12, that the only people who received an education at the time were white wealthy land owning men. I disagree with the use of the word unfair and let the teacher know my feelings politely. It was indicative of the era. Why would we send uneducated people to a meeting to start a government? I simplified it by saying that I wouldn't attempt brain surgery because I do not have medical knowledge. Do you know of any history books written for middle school aged children that are written without a socialist agenda?


TOPICS: Education; History
KEYWORDS: 1791; constitutional; convention; godsgravesglyphs; newjersey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: celticchik
a study guide about how unfair it was that the founding fathers at the Constitutional Convention did not include African Americans, Native Americans, women and poor people.

This is like criticizing the Sumerians for not writing in plain English.

21 posted on 12/01/2009 11:55:38 PM PST by denydenydeny (The Left sees taxpayers the way Dr Frankenstein saw the local cemetery; raw material for experiments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celticchik; Freedom_Is_Not_Free; Natural Law; Dogbert41; norton; VeniVidiVici; Enchante; ...

He (the teacher) distributed a study guide about how unfair it was that the founding fathers at the Constitutional Convention did not include African Americans, Native Americans, women and poor people.

I told this to my 11-year-old daughter, and her concise common-sense response, spoken like a true Conservative tween, was: "Life's not fair." LOL.

Do you know of any history books written for middle school aged children that are written without a PC agenda?

There are many good non-PC books of the era, but might I recommend:

Gathered sketches from the early history of New Hampshire and Vermont - Google Books

You can see the WHOLE open-source text on the above Google Books link, and even download it as a Acrobat PDF file.

I prefer the 1856 version, as it is written in the manner of the day, with good sketched photos, and is unaltered. The author obtained first-hand accounts via sources of the era and personal interviews, reporting on events that occurred during the years of the American Revolution.

We know of this book because a few months ago, my daughter and I had to do a school research project on the patriot Hannah Hunter Hendee, whose story can be found on pages 204-210 of the book.

If you wish to share this with your son — with MY daughter's permission — here's the paper she wrote about the heroine Hannah Hunter Hendee, who was only 27 years old at the time in 1780:


Hannah Hunter Hendee: The Brave Bargainer

A little known hero of the American Revolution, Hannah Hunter Hendee, saved the lives of nine boys including her own son and daughter, displaying courage in a time of calamity.

Not much of Hannah's background is recorded. Her last name, also spelled "Handy," does not yield her birth place or education in history books, although she is said to be born around 1753. Hannah and her husband Robert raised their two children, Lucretia and Michael, in the town of Royalton, Vermont.

Her tale of bravery began on October 16, 1780 when the small town of Royalton was set ablaze by a group of 300 Indian mercenaries from various tribes, hired and under the command of a British officer.

The Hendee family was warned of the oncoming mobbers by other townspeople. The father set out to warn others of the danger while Mrs. Hendee took Michael, her seven-year-old son, and her younger daughter Lucretia to flee into the woods. However, the three were intercepted by a small band of Indians. The Indians did not harm them, but they were under orders to capture any young boys found, to be taken hundreds of miles to Canada to be trained as British soldiers.

The Indians forced Hannah to give up her son, leaving her alone with her hysterical young daughter crying in the woods. She continued to wander along with her daughter, unknowing if her husband and son were dead or if her home and town were now lying in ashes. She mustered the courage to follow to the Indians who had captured her only son, to demand his safe return from the Indians' commanding officer, braving a dangerous three-mile journey through the forest and a very, very dangerous swift-moving river.

Still leading her daughter by the hand, Hannah eventually arrived at the Indian camp with motherly determination. She asked for her son from the Indians, but they refused her request.

She then said to the British officer in charge of the Indians, "You are their commander, and they must and will obey you. The curse will fall upon you for whatever crime they commit, and all the innocent blood they shall shed will be found in your skirts when the secrets of men’s hearts shall be make known, and it will cry for vengeance upon you head!”

Upon hearing this, the commander lowered his head in reverence and brought Hannah her son. Hannah grabbed her son by the wrist, but an Indian tried to take her boy back, brandishing a knife and threatening to kill her. She defiantly held onto her son, telling them she would follow them all of the way to Canada if necessary. She was steadfast — she would not let them have her son!

Taken aback by her determination, they gave Hannah back her son again. However, her heroism not only saved the life of her son, but eight other boys that she noticed at the Indian camp, also taken from their families in Royalton. Using the same logic of Godly-justice that got her son back, she was able to convince the Indians and British officer to release all of the boys to her. Hannah then led them to the safety of a nearby farm, eventually reunited the boys back with their families. Later, the Hendee’s were rejoined as well.

Hannah Hunter Hendee is a great role model for both boys and girls alike. Her heroism against all odds shows Americans that more than anything that they could buy or own, their children is their most valuable asset. This unique and forgotten story is a timeless example of motherly love and determination in the face of certain death.

22 posted on 12/02/2009 12:15:04 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Bookmarked!


23 posted on 12/02/2009 12:36:33 AM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Vote conservative....Please pray for our Troops, our Vets, our Country, Families and Friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: celticchik

Zap him !

If he’s a Social Studies teacher he should know history and accept and present it as it was without judgement.

If he’s allowed by the school to determine the mindset of his students, go to the School Board, take everyone you know, and demand he and the Principle who allowed him to spew personal bias be fired for teaching “biased revisionist” history. Accept and teach the actual climate of that history as it “was” or be fired for incompetence.

He has no right to determine right and wrong history particularly when he didn’t live in that era.

Another loser who is preying on children.


24 posted on 12/02/2009 12:49:34 AM PST by carolina71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celticchik

Didn’t include Native Americans?

Does this teacher not realize the tribes were *sovereign nations* at this date? The colonies made treaties with them as a matter of foreign policy. She might as well wonder why no Canadians or Mexicans were in the Convention.


25 posted on 12/02/2009 3:04:33 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Sorry I am new to free republic. I thought the intent was to get new members and to promote discussions. The first post did not show up so I thought I did it incorrectly. I do not understand your accusation of my “trolling” and posting a “vanity” youtube thread. Are you the monitor of this site ansel12? If so, I don’t think your accusations are very motivating to people new to the site.


26 posted on 12/02/2009 5:26:09 AM PST by celticchik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: celticchik

After emailing my son’s teacher about how I felt about the study guide he distributed about how I disagreed about the use of the word unfair, this was the teacher’s email response. Note the spelling and grammatical errors. lol This is the garbage that our nation’s youth is being fed.

“We talked as a class how mostly the rich received formal education after grade school. Some children did not recieve any education at all until the mid 1800’s, when formal eduation took hold. The reason why I use the term unfair is because the delegates created a representative democracy, yet didn’t include all they were representing. We talked about why they wouldn’t include the genral masses in the convention, and most children agreed that they wouldn’t have included them either because they were not informed or educated. We linked this with the creation of the electoral college because the founding fathers were very leery of letting an uneducated public choose the President. I hope Tim, understood the education piece, I can clear it up in our next discussion too, because maybe some other kids are unclear in it as well.

If you have any other questions, please let me know”


27 posted on 12/02/2009 5:26:20 AM PST by celticchik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celticchik

Go to a used book store and check out some old civics books. Book stores often carry old text books for homeschoolers and collectors. Also, it is interesting to look at the older books written by men for boys.

The way I explained the evolution of freedom in America to my children: We started out with white men from Europe who basically hated each other overcoming their bias towards one another from different European Nations to become Amercians. Then we moved to overcome beliefs of sexual inequality. Then we moved to overcome racial inequality or the inequality of ethnic groups beyound Europe. European Nations have followed our lead. African, South American, Arab and Asian countries - not so much. (In Africa, they are murdering whites and albinos, for example.)

As they got older, I explained to them how the elite use race hate and unconstitutional preferences to divide people so they can get power. How they did it with the White majority in history and how they do it with the “diversity” majority (white women and minorities against white males) today. Actually, my oldest son saw this liberal craziness for himself and asked me if his observations were correct. I just made it clear that we don’t believe in race doctrines about any group even when a racist teacher still does.


28 posted on 12/02/2009 5:54:36 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

I worked for College textbook companies in the early seventies through into the eigthies. I was amazed at the chnges which got incorporated into the texts in just a two year span, over and over again. An example is the ‘evolving’ definition of homosexuality, which was defined in an abnormal psyche text as abberrant behavior, then destructive life style, then alternate life style, then not even included finally in the definitions of abnormality. There were similar ‘evolutions’ of data in History texts and accompanying ‘readers’ used with various Humanities courses. If someone wanted to see the growing influence of socialism/liberalism infecting America, all you have to do is consult the texbooks of the fifties and early sixties as they ‘evolved’ over three following decades. The really pernicious devolution happens when a committee re-writes an old standard text whose author lived in the decades of the Depression and the second World War. During the early eighties, the committee approach to fashioning a PC text became vogue.


29 posted on 12/02/2009 7:02:18 AM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; AAABEST; aberaussie; Aggie Mama; agrace; AliVeritas; AlmaKing; AngieGal; Antoninus; ...

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)

The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.

30 posted on 12/02/2009 8:22:30 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; AAABEST; aberaussie; adopt4Christ; Aggie Mama; agrace; AliVeritas; AlmaKing; AngieGal; ..

Ping to homeschoolers.

Someone is looking for history curriculum that gives an accurate treatment of history, not a PC one.


31 posted on 12/02/2009 8:24:18 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celticchik

Check into classical education curriculum or http://www.welltrainedmind.com/


32 posted on 12/02/2009 8:29:28 AM PST by goldi (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celticchik
I would ask him if he is unable to understand history why is he teaching it? His comment is as stupid as saying why didn't they have gay rights or write in something to cover internet usage as well. If he can't teach according to the understanding of people in that time period, then he shouldn't be teaching at all.

We used ABecka books for our homeschool history classes.

33 posted on 12/02/2009 8:44:27 AM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Happy 234th birthday United States Marine Corps!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celticchik

Don’t worry, cc. Some people have itchy trigger fingers because some disruptors DO have posting histories similar to yours. You’re obviously not a disruptor, so pay no attention to such comments.


34 posted on 12/02/2009 8:47:31 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Two blogs for the price of none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: celticchik

This whole concept of applying today’s standards of thought to yesterday’s actions and posthumously judging them on it is ridiculous. Writing up a legal document and establishing a new government is not easy stuff. It does take people with minds to think, lawyers for one thing to cover the legal bases.

I wonder exactly what input it is that she thinks they should have had or would have had? Some of today’s touchy-feeling special rights nonsense?

Even though the Constitutional Convention was composed of men only, yes, educated, white men, you are right, it reflected the standards of the day, which did not include worrying about *being faaiiirrr*. They had more important work to do setting up the government than worrying about people’s feelings.

If you read the Constitution and Declaration of Independence carefully, you will not find anywhere where women, blacks, Indians, *poor people* (whatever that means) etc, are specifically excluded from the *all men are created equal* clause. So, just because it was white men who wrote up and signed the documents, doesn’t mean that they didn’t take others into account. They did the best they could at the time.

Thomas Jefferson moved to outlaw slave trade as soon as he could and signed a law making it illegal in 1807.
Now, these documents established our current government and the laws and protections included were for citizens. BUT, the laws of each individual state regarding citizenship are a different issue.

Also, it was not only *rich, white* people who received an education.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2005/is_n4_v29/ai_18600988/

Literacy was considered important in those days, because of the importance of being able to read the Bible. Children went to school when and where they could, and often, if they didn’t have access to public education, they were instructed at home.

So, while there is a disparity in literacy, not just wealthy, white, landowners who were the only ones to receive an education.

Honestly, teachers like your son’s are just one of the myriads of reasons so many of us homeschool.


35 posted on 12/02/2009 8:52:06 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; celticchik

Noticed (and thought of) by others.

Interesting posting history.


36 posted on 12/02/2009 8:55:54 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: metmom

If you poke around on the HSLDA site, you might come up with a link to something.

I remember listening to a speech by Michael Farris where he talked about the Howard Zinn history book - NOT THE ONE TO GET!!! - being the PC history book of choice for colleges everywhere.

PS, found it:
Google “patriots history of the united states”


37 posted on 12/02/2009 8:59:12 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MrB

A truly awful book I encountered in college. Fortunately my homeschool education let me see just how ridiculously stupid it was.


38 posted on 12/02/2009 9:02:15 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JenB

www.notgrass.com has WONDERFUL textbooks, written by Ray Notgrass. I have them, you’ll like them


39 posted on 12/02/2009 9:04:21 AM PST by Shimmer1 (I'm as Mad as Hell, and I'm Not Gonna Take This Anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ccruse456

That is so true, and so unPC, but I repeat myself.

“White Christian Males” built this country and the concepts of individual liberty in Western Culture.


40 posted on 12/02/2009 9:04:38 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson