Posted on 11/27/2009 8:30:40 PM PST by Noob1999
Why is every single thread that I log onto this day after Thanksgiving, have a picture of Mitt Romney, that then trashes him??
Does JimRob and this website condone the Palin trashers, and try to create a Mitt backlash, to trash him?
Does this website wish to promote a Republican/Conservative candidate who has no real business experience, like our current loser-in-chief, Zer0?
Mitt has problems, as do each and every Pubbie, Conservative, or RAT potential to lead this once great US!
Back off on the hits to Romney, (or maybe do you see him as a threat, much like the RATs see Palin as a threat??)
So far Mitt has stood to support almost everything that goes against basic Republican values.
Every time the Republicans nominate someone that goes against the basic Republican values either the country makes the decision to go for the Democrat candidate or we get burned by our own candidate. No more for me. I refuse to vote for another RINO.
...................If Romney’s or McCain’s or anyone else’s positions are good, they should be praised, and if not, challenged. But the tarring and feathering of those who appear to be obstacles to our favorite candidates smacks of, dare I say it, liberal tactics. We don’t need that anymore than we need RINOs......................
Thank you! That’s my entire point!
Let everyone have their say, let everyone choose for themselves on the merits.
Let’s not have our favorite website take an intractable position this early in the game!
MR’s positions have been challenged many times here and that is why he is rejected. Giving the impression that his positions have not been discussed is disingenuous.
Because Romney is a liberal for Abortion, Mandatory/Gov
funded Health Care, and G@y “Marriage”?
?? Then why is any of this surprising? Mid term RINO hunts are par for the course.
Not to mention that he's no God, either.
Cordially,
....................Hey - who did you support in 2000? 2004? 2008? What is your old screen name?...............
Bush, Bush, McCain.........aShepard
It would be if I did that. I didn't.
Your post is a perfect example of what I'm talking about, though, so thanks.
Yeah. This is really smart. Free Republic is becoming an asset to the Democrats.
Intellectual honesty is the ultimate defense. If Romney’s or McCain’s or anyone else’s positions are good, they should be praised, and if not, challenged”
A voice of reason in the midst of a rampaging mob, but then many of them seem quick to hid behind the “big guy” instead of standing on their own.
The Capuano campaign says:
“Steve Pagliuca’s ads keep claiming he is a progressive Democrat, but as we have found out, he supported Mitt Romney over Ted Kennedy and even gave money to George Bush.”
http://www.necn.com/Boston/Politics/2009/11/27/As-Senate-election-nears-ad/1259353483.html
Gawrsh, a progressive democrat supporting Mitt over Teddy! Maybe Paglucia isn’t a progressive at all, or maybe Mitt...
What you said BUMP!
Excellent. Well stated.
“Let’s not have our favorite website take an intractable position this early in the game!”
If I have to choose between “tractable positions” on a liberal candidate and “utterly destroying the RINO before it give birth” - I choose the latter. I will proclaim my Romney like pro-choice stand and, in this one instance, support the early abortion of the baby Romney RINO candidacy.
Tell us one thing you like about Mitt.
Romney would have been better than 0 and better than McCain. The tides of change are sweeping over. Think Virginia, NJ and NY-23.
To the RINO mind, sure. To the conservative, FREEDOM works, socialist sell outs do not.
Just as Anthrax is better than Ebola.
Unless you were given a timeout and didn't come clean, that tells me that Noob1999 is just a Sock Puppet account intended to deceive!
Your honor is dust.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.