“If Romney’s or McCain’s or anyone else’s positions are good, they should be praised, and if not, challenged. But the tarring and feathering of those who appear to be obstacles to our favorite candidates smacks of, dare I say it, liberal tactics. “
MR’s positions have been challenged many times here and that is why he is rejected. Giving the impression that his positions have not been discussed is disingenuous.
MRs positions have been challenged many times here and that is why he is rejected. Giving the impression that his positions have not been discussed is disingenuous. It would be if I did that. I didn't.
Your post is a perfect example of what I'm talking about, though, so thanks.