Skip to comments.
POLL: Should members of Congress be required to undergo random alcohol and drug testing?
Takebackusa.com ^
| 11-23-2009
| unixfox
Posted on 11/23/2009 3:04:35 PM PST by unixfox
POLL: Should members of Congress be required to undergo random alcohol and drug testing?
VOTE HERE!
TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: alcohol; congress; drug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
IF they want to ram healthcare down our throats then I say YES!!
1
posted on
11/23/2009 3:04:38 PM PST
by
unixfox
To: unixfox
If they fail, they get fired!! Just like any other employee!!
2
posted on
11/23/2009 3:06:15 PM PST
by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
To: unixfox
Yes - and most would fail, and be unable to blame it on a poppyseed bagel.
3
posted on
11/23/2009 3:06:59 PM PST
by
BigEdLB
(Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
To: unixfox
Loyalty testing maybe.
4
posted on
11/23/2009 3:08:46 PM PST
by
Doomonyou
(Let them eat Lead. Bonus tag line: FAIL 246, Obama 0)
To: unixfox
Yes 95% (42 votes) No 0% (0 votes)
Not Sure 2% (1 votes)
Other: 2% (1 votes)
Other? It's a yes or no question!
5
posted on
11/23/2009 3:11:49 PM PST
by
Doomonyou
(Let them eat Lead. Bonus tag line: FAIL 246, Obama 0)
To: unixfox
Why stop there? They way they’re screwing all of us, they should be tested for STD’s as well.
To: unixfox
7
posted on
11/23/2009 3:15:52 PM PST
by
timestax
(CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
To: unixfox
AND tax with financial status audits, polygraphs, risk analysis interrogations, physic exams and overall “fit for duty” evaluations. They should be under the microscope the entire time that they’re in office. But, any findings would be pointless unless fair and impartial enforcement was available.
Frankly, none of this would be necessary if competent leaders of honor and integrity were voted into office in the first place.
So...”term limits” would fix many problems with these self serving crooks.
8
posted on
11/23/2009 3:17:15 PM PST
by
Gator113
(Obama is Americas First Failed Black Pres-dent.....)
To: unixfox
How about IQ tests instead?
To: unixfox
They should be required to undergo a lot of things.
10
posted on
11/23/2009 3:28:41 PM PST
by
TribalPrincess2U
(demonicRATS... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
To: unixfox
I am more interested in those that are on public assistance taking drug and alcohol testing.
11
posted on
11/23/2009 3:31:25 PM PST
by
notpoliticallycorewrecked
(According to the MSM, I'm a fringe sitting, pajama wearing Freeper)
To: Doomonyou
Why did 2 people vote no?
12
posted on
11/23/2009 3:32:48 PM PST
by
omega4179
(0 is an embarrassment to us all.)
To: unixfox
Yes 97% (122 votes)
No 2% (2 votes)
Not Sure 1% (1 votes)
Other: 1% (1 votes)
Total Votes: 126
13
posted on
11/23/2009 3:34:44 PM PST
by
LADY J
(Change your thoughts and you change your world. - Norman Vincent Peale)
To: unixfox
You forgot sanity checks.
14
posted on
11/23/2009 3:36:44 PM PST
by
ataDude
(Its like 1933, mixed with the Carter 70s, plus the books 1984 and Animal Farm, all at the same time.)
To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
I am more interested in those that are on public assistance taking drug and alcohol testingAnd that is exactly what is wrong with your thinking ...
15
posted on
11/23/2009 3:52:31 PM PST
by
08bil98z24
(The WOD is unconstitutional ------>>> NObama ... Anybody but him!)
To: omega4179
Why did 2 people vote no? Probably my Senators.
16
posted on
11/23/2009 4:07:30 PM PST
by
Doomonyou
(Let them eat Lead. Bonus tag line: FAIL 246, Obama 0)
To: unixfox
17
posted on
11/23/2009 4:19:42 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: unixfox
Hell YES!
Maybe we could include an IQ test too!
18
posted on
11/23/2009 4:20:08 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: unixfox
Yes.
And I also recommend a random flutter if they are serving on any "intelligence" or "security" committees.
Stop the leaks.
19
posted on
11/23/2009 4:27:03 PM PST
by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus)
To: unixfox
Actually, members of the all three branches should not be aloowed to exempt themselves from any law, executive order, agency regulation or ruling.
20
posted on
11/23/2009 4:57:18 PM PST
by
PhiloBedo
(I won't be happy until Jet-A is less than $2.00 a gallon)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson