Posted on 11/18/2009 7:40:28 PM PST by Man50D
Rest of the title: in US District Court, Nashville, Tennessee
The Criminal charges of Conspiracy and Fraud are served against Nancy Pelosi in US District Court, Nashville, Tennessee
RELEASED BY: American Grand Jury
Charges filed with multiple State Election Commissions claiming Election fraud by Pelosi and Obama.
American Grand Jury has incorporated the Nancy Pelosi/Barack Obama criminal complaints within its Presentments. The Presentments were served on the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville, TN on November 6th, 2009. A Response in the form of an Order has been issued by Judge Todd Campbell and received by American Grand Jury this week. American Grand Jury will answer the response in the form of a Motion. The American Grand Jury Motion and a copy of the Courts Order will be published on the AGJ website within the next few days.
If acted upon, the Grand Jury Presentments would require that Pelosi and Obama be criminally indicted for Fraud, Conspiracy and Treason.
American Grand Jury is actively pursuing the serving of Presentments in a number of United States District Courts in different States.
Noob, you have absolutely no standing here to ask me to leave FR. If Jim ever wants me gone, he can arrange it without your oh-so-valuable counsel.
You got that right. And I give you credit for having the courage to say it here.
Why don’t you ask? I’m sure you’ll find that Jim Robinson sincerely opposes all this “birther nonsense” just as much as you do. Go on, ask, let’s see how long your account lasts once you get under mod scrutiny.
Sounds really, REALLY good. Let’s hope this one makes it to the ‘big time’.
You’re right of course. But the screwball faction ain’t gonna like hearing it.
The Grand Jury is also known as the peoples panel. Every citizen should know the history and purpose of the grand jury in order to properly protect their fellow man from prosecutorial abuse. When citizens are unaware of their power they cannot exercise that power to uphold justice.
...
The grand jury was originally a body of twelve, and later twenty-three men that served as accusers who presented indictments at the request of not only the prosecutor of the king, but also at the request of individual citizens. In 1681 the grand jury rule of secrecy was adopted. This allowed the grand jury to meet in secret, especially out of the sight of the kings prosecutors who might interfere. This secrecy provided the grand jury great power as an independent body with oversight over the government.
...
The grand jury served the public in two ways. First, it limited the power of government to prosecute citizens by permitting the grand jury to vote for or against an indictment and second, it had the power to make a presentment. A presentment was a public report of the grand jurys activity. Through a presentment, the grand jury could make criminal activity known to the public, including criminal conduct committed by government officials, judges, or prosecutors
....
It is significant that the grand jury is not part of any of the three branches of the U.S. governmentit is a pre-constitutional institution. Washington attorney John H. Clarke wrote in a motion to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Although today the grand jury is more of a prosecutors panel, it is still a pre-constitutional institution, and is still a peoples panel, not captive or relegated by the constitution to a position within any branches
and it still serves as a vehicle for effective citizen participation in government.
...
Citizens often mistakenly believe that because the grand jury meets at the courthouse it is under the judiciary or because the grand jury meets with a prosecutor it is under the executive branch. It is actually an independent institution adopted by the founders to protect the individual from prosecutorial misconduct.
...
From 1789 when the Bill of Rights was ratified, until the codification of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in 1946, the grand jury was not regulated by statute.
All three branches of government shared a common interest in limiting the power of the grand jurythe pre-constitutional institution unregulated by any branch.
Gradually, the executive branch began to limit the power of the grand jury..."
http://www.dcdave.com/article5/070119.htm
A related book on the subject:
The people's panel: the Grand Jury in the United States, 1634-1941 By Richard D. Younger
Great job!
Fear? Why would anyone be afraid? Now, I will grant you that (speaking strictly for myself) that I have a certain amount of pride. What I find laughable is this notion that anyone, anywhere can form a grand jury out of any group of people whatsoever and it's legitimate. The obvious end to this madness would be competing grand juries "indicting" everyone and everything, especially other impromptu grand juries who're "indicting" everyone of opposing political stripes.
Think this through. Can the system work without rules? Can this system work if anyone can form a grand jury of any number of people, drawn from any source? Under such anarchy, what’s to stop me from forming a grand jury in my living tonight with my wife, adult children and some riding buddies? What’s to keep that from happening in living rooms all across town then flooding the Dallas County Courthouse with a couple hundred thousand indictments on Monday morning, effectively shutting the system down with quackery.
Now, if the official in the court of law want's to ACT on that presentment, then so be it. There will be a trial then, to hear the evidence. If the court official doesn't act on it...then nothing becomes of it.
Historically, this is (in part) how it happened. Read the history.
presentment
": the act of presenting to an authority a formal statement of a matter to be dealt with; specifically : the notice taken or statement made by a grand jury of an offense from their own knowledge without a bill of indictment laid before them"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/presentment
So, go ahead and take your accusations to any court official. This is, after-all, exactly what this grand jury is doing.
I went to the site. I read it. It's silly. I can tell you right now that no legal authority will ever act on any of these “indictments”. If this is your hobby in your mother's basement, fine, but don't expect anyone to take it seriously as a demonstration of your patriotism and devotion to the constitution. As Richard Feynman was wont to say about bad science, "That's not even wrong." It's on par with my saying I have a magic ring and a helpful elf that will remove Obama from office.
I am a veteran who goes to church regularly, and in no way do I consider myself at risk of being labelled a domestic terrorist. That kind of hysterical bedwetting is unbecoming of the land of the free and the home of the brave. It simply makes conservatism look like the abode of cranks.
A weirdo would be someone who isn’t doing everything that they could think of to stop what is happening to our country.
Only someone who doesn’t understand the depth and seriousness of what future generations are going to saddled with in the form of debt and lack of freedom wouldn’t be jumping up and down supporting anything and everything to stop the course we are on.
We should be thankful we still have peaceful options available to us to exercise our rights and be heard.
well said...
Grand Juries charging a federal crime must be called by a United States District Court pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This group of folks was not convened in accordance with the law, they did not comport their investigation in conformity with the law and their "presentment" to the court necessarily asks the court to try Mrs. Pelosi without due process of law.
Actually, that is not true, a citizens grand jury DOES have standing.
It is getting the authorities to pay attention to it. They are REQUIRED to act on it, however, depending on the political persuasion of those who are reviewing the case, it may not be brought to more than a jury to sit and hear evidence in a citizens grand jury, with a reccomendation to press charges.
The govcernment MUST act on this complaint, itis legit, legal, and perfect acceptable. It just depends on who is in charge as to whether it gets acted upon.
Since the Dhimms run everything, it wont.
But make no mistake, what Man50D posted is perfectly legal and fine in any court of law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.