Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(vanity). Purge the Palin haters from our party.

Posted on 11/10/2009 11:39:26 AM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
What is the difference between a RINO and an independent and a converted Democrat?

Independents and converted Democrats are voters, who in large numbers don't feel represented by the politicians of either major party. Reagan got millions of votes from these groups by presenting a pro-American vision for the USA.

RINOS for the most part are already politicians who wear the Republican label, but have become hopelessly compromised and corrupted, such that by one method or another, bribe or extortion, they are pressured to vote with the Democrats and betray every plank of the Republican platform.

RINOs are the people who vote for anti-American trade agreements to the detriment of the majority of American citizens. They are the ones who vote with the Democrats for un-Constitutional nanny-state laws that violate the rights of every citizen. They are the ones who support open borders when the illegals are displacing millions of citizen workers. They are the ones who support unneeded visa work programs that have displaced millions of citizen workers in high tech and engineering. They are the ones who vote with the Democrats on environmental regulations that push factories overseas and displace millions of citizen workers. They are the ones who vote with the teacher unions to defeat voucher bills. In all their scams, a few of their supporters get filthy rich, while the vast majority of citizens get the shaft.

Romney, Huck, and Pawlenty are all RINOs. Each of them can offer favors to their select few members of the Republican party, but neither of them can unify the party because they have no respect for the Constitution or for the entire population of citizens. To those voters outside their select group, they have to lie to get the votes.

On the other hand, a Constitutional conservative can honestly represent the interests of the whole nation of people, based on the governmental constraints in the Constitution, and supporting the rights to life, liberty, and property of every citizen.

161 posted on 11/10/2009 4:30:18 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

Thanks for explanation. I do see an intermingling of the elected with simply voters so still don’t understand distinct differences. I just say we take votes wherever we can get them.


162 posted on 11/10/2009 4:39:00 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma (Al Franken--the face of the third-party voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Furthermore, Reagan could have accomplished much more had he not been shackled by communist majorities in Congress for most of his terms.

Lots of voters think they need a "balance" between Republicans and Democrats, between congress and the executive, but that is only true when RINOs are the Republicans in question. The tug-of-war is still between two groups that practice group politics.

A conservative executive and a conservative congress, operating on Constitutional grounds, would be a balanced government. They would not represent special interest groups on either side; they would simply govern according to the Constitution. There is no precedent to use as an example, because this has never happened since the founding, and is unlikely to happen now. But it is the ideal envisioned by the founders.

163 posted on 11/10/2009 4:40:42 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
Agreed but do you know that early on, Reagan went to the liberal wing of the Republican party to try to get them on board. It was because of these alliances he formed with RINOs that we got Reagan.

There are many, many Republicans/conservatives that now believe that that is "compromising principles" and they would immeditately eliminate Reagan because he was not pure enough.

How stupid would that be?

164 posted on 11/10/2009 4:46:35 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma (Al Franken--the face of the third-party voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
RINOs haven't converted; they just want in the Big Tent without having to believe in anything.

Cheers!

165 posted on 11/10/2009 4:55:10 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

What makes sense is a Primary Day. Where all the states vote their candidate together.


Interesting and I’ve often wondered if that could work? My problem with one day is that the candidates will spend their time in a very few key states and most likely many states will not see them ever set foot within their boundaries. Kinda like the Presidential campaign where they write off certain states, take some for granted and select a few competitive ones and that’s where most of the time and money are spent.

I have even thought about a regional concept three/four primary days where the states for each of the days are selected from across the country such that you have a few smaller states, some middle size and a large one or two, some from the north, south, east and west in each day. If you did three primary days then you could have 16 states in each date.


166 posted on 11/10/2009 5:08:42 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

Book mark for later


167 posted on 11/10/2009 5:18:57 PM PST by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

While I think you’re being totally irrational, I do like the fact that we have such young conservatives. I hope there are many more like you but with a calmer head.


Stages generally apply as we all grow up and mature. Idealism mixed with zeal slowly for most will turn into realism with patience or for others they will give up in general. jmo.


168 posted on 11/10/2009 5:23:44 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

Don’t you realize that by abandoning your principles you are HELPING destroy the country? Wow.


169 posted on 11/10/2009 6:55:07 PM PST by rintense (You do not advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. ~ rintense, 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
RINOs haven't converted; they just want in the Big Tent without having to believe in anything.

I'm not as interested in what they believe as I am in what they do...i.e. Pataki backing Hoffman in NY-23.

At some point pragmatism enters the picture or the Democrats win every election from here to eternity.

Conservative politicians must dominate the GOP, and the RINOs must be persuaded to follow their lead.

170 posted on 11/10/2009 7:06:04 PM PST by Chunga (Being A Libertarian Means Never Having To Actually Govern)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

I whole-heartedly agree! and I have been using a person’s view of Sarah as a litmus test myself. It tells me they are a true conservative or not, and knowledgeable about what is at stake or not. It seems an awful lot of people don’t have a clue about what is being done to us and the United States of America! It has weeded out who I associate with and who I do business with.

The Republican Party is the ‘biggest tent’. That is, if it includes anyone who holds to our Constitution, individual liberty and responsibility, a strong national defense, small representative government, free market capitalism, and low taxes. To me, if you don’t want to abide by what our Founders, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution lay out, then go find a country that suits you - don’t change THIS one!


171 posted on 11/10/2009 7:42:50 PM PST by GlockLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Chunga
I'm not as interested in what they believe as I am in what they do...i.e. Pataki backing Hoffman in NY-23.

Yes, for the short term. But if the differences are too great, or (typically) if they are pro-choice, they knife conservatives in the back to curry favor with their pro-abortion, pro-death friends.

"If you would sup with the devil, bring a long spoon."

NO cheers, unfortunately.

172 posted on 11/10/2009 7:47:15 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: rintense; All

>>>One thing is for sure, the majority of the Romney and Rudy supporters have been purged from FR.

As this and similar threads illustrate, that dropped the board’s average IQ by about half, leaving the place to be overrun by paulites, birchers, and mouth breathing Luddites going into convulsions every time a flood plain is dug up because it “proves” Noah.

If Palin gets tagged as the crackpot’s godmother she is finished. Sarah deserves better then such bozos, but then don’t we all.

btw, don’t forget while you are purging 80% of the party, be sure to tell the kids to keep off your lawn too. Just to complete the tableau.


173 posted on 11/10/2009 10:53:25 PM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots

Don’t like her flaky ways? Wow. I suspect projection. Why don’t you list her flaky ways and enlighten us.


174 posted on 11/11/2009 4:22:21 AM PST by rintense (You do not advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. ~ rintense, 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: OnTheDress
The GOP needs to focus.

As I said before, SCREW THE GOP.

You can do what you want.

175 posted on 11/11/2009 9:36:29 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Ask not what the Kennedys can do for you, but what you can do for the Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Fine, then do it but this thread is about purging anyone who is not a Palin supporter.

The way we accomplish that is to give zero to the GOP and what we used to give to the GOP to Palin.

Palin IS the new RNC.

176 posted on 11/11/2009 9:38:58 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Ask not what the Kennedys can do for you, but what you can do for the Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
But she is a good lithmis test to see who is really a conservative and who is not.

Not really - I don't care for certain aspects of her personal life and political career that have nothing to do with her being a Conservative. Trying to make one person a litmus test is veering dangerously near being a cult of personality and that's the last thing we need. Even Sarah herself would agree with that, based on what I've read.

A better litmus test is focusing on Conservative principles - Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, even Rush Limbaugh, among others have promoted the idea that it's not a party or a letter next to your name that makes you Conservative, it's what you believe, and I think that should be the focus.

I do agree there should be a purge - we've let the moderates run the GOP for too many years now and the end result is Obama inheriting the biggest, most powerful, most intrusive federal government in the history of the US.

Barring a purge of the GOP, we should probably take Palin's and Beck's advice and look at third parties. I know I'm not alone these days when I say I will no longer support the GOP as long as it's run by moderates and as long as it pushes a moderate agenda - I'm tired of being told this crap about how we have to support the GOP no matter how far to the left it veers. A vote for a liberal Republican is still a vote for a liberal.
177 posted on 11/12/2009 8:58:18 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
You folks are hopeless.

What's hopeless is continuing to support a moderate GOP and trying to convince yourself that someday they'll swing back to the right.

This is total political suicide.

Total political suicide was committed when we had a Republican in the White House and a Republican-controlled Congress for several years earlier this decade and we yet we somehow ended up with a bigger, more powerful, more intrusive, and more expensive federal government.
178 posted on 11/12/2009 9:03:29 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson