It is interesting to watch a person who is obviously wrong devolve to using ad hominem attacks such as calling his opponents "liars." Those who are without facts to defend their position attack the person of their opponent and call them names, hoping to marginalize them and their facts. A certain troll on this thread has been doing this on almost every one of his recent posts. It is a typical methodology used by Liberals.
He cannot even use English words for their correct definitions and when called on it, repeats the offense.
His attempt to redefine a well known indisputable fact—that Windows is the most attacked and breached operating system in the world—as something disputable by either asserting that it is only a matter of being only "possible" (as though it requires further proof to confirm its truth) or even "probable" (questioning by implication its certainty because "probable" implies that it is not certain), is a very slick form of lying itself.
If I were still feeding that Troll, I would probably point out his lack of honesty.
But you're not, since (in the words of Richard Nixon), "That would be wrong, that's for sure." ;-)
Here’s some more quotes from me:
that’s really the danger point in Windows, there’s way too many times a Windows machine is running code from god knows where without the user having any idea or buy in.
Is Windows the most vulnerable? Yes.
Windows had more malware aimed at it and was more vulnerable.
Windows has more malware problems and is more vulnerable to the malware.
Where exactly is the “uncertainty”? Maybe you really are lying. See how I used that “maybe” there, because he know for a fact you’re lying. These quote show that everything you said about what I wrote is a lie.