Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines (What could possibly go wrong?)

The Flu Case ^ | 9-14-09 | F. William Engdahl

[blueglass]

In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.” The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough: “At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be extremely strong and effective.” 1

There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticles—they can be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health damage.

Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once they interact with the body’s cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction.

[grey_whiskers]

Cheers!

[grey_whiskers]

Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being outlawed.

"Stop! You can't lyse that pulmonary cell membrane! It's against the law!"

No cure for stupid, or for journalists...but I repeat myself.

Cheers!

[allmost]

yeah. where’s that cowbell?

[Gargantua]

I know just what it needs.... more cowbell!

;-/

[grey_whiskers]

Thanks, glad you picked up on it. :-)

[American Constitutionalist]

Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines (What could possibly go wrong?) ... NANO tracking devices to track and ID people.. that's what can go wrong.....

[DannyTN]

"Now it has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other European countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells and can be deadly."

It's come out where? I didn't see any source or proof for this statement in the article.

[wastedyears]

The swine flu can bring it on. Nature’s put me through the paces, I can hack it.

[kimmie7]

Meanwhile, Vanderbilt announced it has developed what appears to be an effective h1n1 vaccine. I’d take Vandy over just about anywhere. After having a million dollar baby there, I think we paid for a wing or two of the new hospital, lol.

[the anti-liberal]

Nano-plague jumps from the pages of scifi. Just what 0 needs to keep people from thinking about his long-form birth certificate.

[The Comedian]

Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body.

Well, I can't possibly imagine that anything could go wrong here...

[Secret Agent Man]

It’s good, but I think it needs more nanoparticles. /SNL

[allmost]

yup.

[maine-iac7]

obamacare -

[DoorGunner]

I don’t have the energy to pursue this topic fully, right now, but the situation MAY be that the use of nanoparticles to DESTROY cancer cells as in this:

http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/pdf/10.2217/nnm.09.26

has been misunderstood by the anti-vaccine websites.

This is NOT an endorsement of ANY vaccine, just a possibility. More later.

DG