For other space news go to: http://www.spacetoday.net
Posted on 09/04/2009 5:19:47 PM PDT by KevinDavis
Both Tau Zero Foundation founder Marc Millis and JPL’s recently retired Robert Frisbee appear in an article in the Smithsonian’s Air & Space, where voyages to distant places indeed are discussed. Nothing is further from Earth, the article notes, than Voyager 1, which travels at a speed (almost 17 kilometers per second) that would get it across the US in a little under four minutes. Point that spacecraft toward Proxima Centauri and the journey at this speed would take 73,000 years. Clearly, something has to give, and writer Michael Klesius runs through the options.
(Excerpt) Read more at centauri-dreams.org ...
always interesting but we’re going to have to use the sun’s gravity to make a worm hole.
first we need to learn how, of course
simple...
=o)
How apt is it that a propulsion expert should be named “Frisbee...”
It is easy....
We’re not going since Hopey-Changey requires our economy to pay for welfare, useless czars, and shovel ready (not yet) jobs. That should simplify matters.
Maybe not easy, but wasn’t a rudementary application used by the Nazi’s to colonise Moon Base Alpha?
He’s placating those who think the space program is a waste of money.
I favor Dyson’s project Orion, using nuclear bombs to propel a spaceship to much higher velocities than is possible with chemical rocket motors....
Mars in a few weeks....
One can thank Nixon, the PC crowd, and the envirowackos for suppressing this advancement in science and space flight, sticking us instead with a poorly designed shuttle to nowhere except a dead end. All the other forms of propulsion proposed are either theoretical or inferior -> because they are slower and would require as yet unsolved solutions to protect their small crews. In a sense, one could say that each of them is a step backward.
But as wally_bert said we have to pay for “welfare, useless czars, and shovel ready (not yet) jobs.”
I had forgotten the “bomb drive” idea until you brought it up again. What is the odd little nuclear device compared to the incalcuable amount of radiation in space? I guess the watermelons consider space pristine and empty. In reality they hate progress because they are shown to be useless and unnecessary when things improve. I hate those so-called people.
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/A/advanced_propulsion_concepts.html
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/B/beamedenergyprop.html
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/L/laserprop.html
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/P/photon_propulsion.html
fission (Orion)
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/O/OrionProj.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)
http://www.islandone.org/Propulsion/ProjectOrion.html
http://www.angelfire.com/stars2/projectorion/
http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/02/updated-project-orion-nuclear-pulse.html
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/309/1 [”The fuel would be 800 nuclear bombs.”]
fusion (Daedalus)
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/D/Daedalus.html
You are right about hating “progress” — in fact many of them would rather see all of us return to the 14th century (except for them). This is why they are so intent on dumbing down children by rewriting history to reflect their view points in schoolbooks. They would rather children grow up to be social activists than engineers.
We’re sooo old fashioned :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.