Skip to comments.
New Law of Physics Could Explain Quantum Mysteries
PhysOrg ^
| 8/17/09
| Lisa Zyga
Posted on 08/18/2009 10:37:08 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: LibWhacker
I am not sure how he would ever be able to prove this.
To: LibWhacker
Yeah. So how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
3
posted on
08/18/2009 10:40:54 AM PDT
by
Pessimist
To: LibWhacker
4
posted on
08/18/2009 10:41:03 AM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: LibWhacker
The Invariant Set Postulate differentiates between reality and unreality, suggesting the existence of a state space, within which a smaller subset of state space (reality) is embedded. The “statists” need a space where the laws of physics, and the laws of economics do not apply. Let’s hope they all move there. I think it is near Berkley.
5
posted on
08/18/2009 10:41:41 AM PDT
by
FatherofFive
(Islam is an EVIL like no other, and must be ERADICATED. Barack OBORTION is a close second.)
To: betty boop; Alamo-Girl
6
posted on
08/18/2009 10:42:54 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: LibWhacker
Proof is left as an exercise to the reader.
To: brytlea
In a nutshell: everything that we know to exist and is currently true and measurable is in one invariable state, and everything that is immeasurable or affected by some outside force (think Heisenberg) is part of this “unreal” variable state.
8
posted on
08/18/2009 10:47:38 AM PDT
by
rarestia
("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / MOLWN LABE!)
To: LibWhacker
I was just about to write all that stuff myself, but I went and made myself a sandwich instead.
Darn.
9
posted on
08/18/2009 10:47:51 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jazzy
("I AM JIM THOMPSON!!!")
To: brytlea
10
posted on
08/18/2009 10:48:17 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(If we are astroturf, why are the democrats trying to mow us?)
To: LibWhacker
Wow... It appears that the prophets Parker and Stone have hit one out of the park again with the South Park episode "Imanginationland."
This is also sort of in-line with the concept behind Heinlein's "Number of the Beast," as well as uncounted stoner discussions about the nature of the universe.
Mark
11
posted on
08/18/2009 10:48:47 AM PDT
by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
To: LibWhacker
12
posted on
08/18/2009 10:51:52 AM PDT
by
MNDude
(The Republican Congress Economy--1995-2007)
To: brytlea
My head hurts now.... Mine too. I understood just enough of that to lure me into trying to understand the rest. Now I've got a bad case of brain strain.
13
posted on
08/18/2009 10:52:11 AM PDT
by
6ppc
(It's torch and pitchfork time)
To: LibWhacker; Salamander
They’re just coming up with this new law now to shift the debate from Obamacare. The physicists are all pinko/commie/libs.
14
posted on
08/18/2009 10:53:24 AM PDT
by
shibumi
(" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
To: r9etb
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Going to need a bigger calculator.
To: Zathras
I thought this thread might interest you - after all:
"Zathras understand. No Zathras not understand, but Zathras do. Zathras good at doings, not understandings."
18
posted on
08/18/2009 11:05:45 AM PDT
by
shibumi
(" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
To: rarestia
That doesn’t make your head spin?
19
posted on
08/18/2009 11:07:37 AM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: 6ppc
LOL that’s really the problem. I almost understand portions, but I can’t wrap my head around the big picture. :(
20
posted on
08/18/2009 11:08:25 AM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson