To: LibWhacker
I am not sure how he would ever be able to prove this.
To: dog breath
Doesn’t sound like he can.
The electron might be here. It might be over there.
QM can’t tell us for sure.
Neither can his theory.
31 posted on
08/18/2009 11:24:20 AM PDT by
djf
(The "racism" spiel is a crutch, those who unashamedly lean on it, cripples!)
To: dog breath
New Law of Physics Could Explain Quantum Mysteries
Or the new law is being invoked to explain away problems caused by defective older laws; that is, someone came up with an idea, loved the idea, tried to reconcile it with reality, came up short, and then claimed that there was something in reality that we had not yet seen to explain the discrepancy between their predictions and observations.
48 posted on
08/18/2009 12:04:59 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: dog breath
I am not sure how he would ever be able to prove this. As I understand it (not really at all...), the proof lies in the mathematical consistency of the theory. Whether all the "known" stuff fits correctly within it without fudging any numbers.
70 posted on
08/18/2009 3:00:12 PM PDT by
TChris
(There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson