Posted on 08/11/2009 5:44:59 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
Obama supporters typically site the birth announcements in Honolulu newspapers as a main line of attack against the “birthers,” who claim Barack Obama wasn’t born in the U.S. This line of attack is fundamentally useless when it comes to the courts and the law, but let’s examine these announcements a little closer.
Both birth announcements – from the Star Bulletin and the Honolulu advertiser – report Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama to be living at 6085 Kalanianaole Highway. Unfortunately for Obama supporters, WMD took the time to research this possibility. Turns out, in 1961 the residence was owned by someone else. University of Hawaii Professor Orland Scott Lefforge and his wife, Thelma Young, bought the property in 1958; and they didn’t move until the 70s. Meanwhile, Barack Obama, Sr. rented an apartment at 625 11th Ave. in Kaimuki.
Now, why would an honest Obama family disclose an invalid address with Obama’s birth announcements? It will be interesting to see if this revelation even phases Obama supporters who dogmatically believe that these birth announcements are indisputable proof that Obama was born in Hawaii.
some people think that the Obamas were using a lot of phony SS numbers and address’s as they were engaged in some kind of fraud and of course did not want to be found. That is another explanation as to why the address would be fraudulent.
That's the oldest looking 5 year old I've ever seen.
In addition, she may have still been in Kenya when Obama was actually born. She may have completely bypassed Hawaii.
When will we see Obama’s original long form birth certificate, Occidental College records, and passport to Pakistan in 1981?
NOt the house itself..but the cottage behind it.
Most likely, if the announcement is real and not a plant job over the Nordyke twins announcement that is missing...
they used the address as a cover because of the cottage.
The owner may or may not have been in on the deception.
A good answer would be to subpoena Obama’s documents to court.
You wrote-
“As we now know from WND, the newspaper announcements were generated automatically by the act of registering a birth with the state.
Which means that the long-form birth certificate contains a fraudulent address? What other false information is on it? The PLACE of birth?
What information is missing? The name of a hospital? The name of a doctor?”
No way that boy is 5 years old. The caption could be wrong.
Have you found a definite year of when that picture was taken?
Ahhh, another shake to the house of cards.
"One of these things is not like the others/One of these things just doesn't belong...."
No but, supposedly, he never saw his father after age 10.
They need to assign a government special prosecutor to all of this!
The ever growing trail of suspicious info following Hussein.
Not a deformity just a limp wrist.
Old news....I researched the Hawaiian records and found out the same right after the elections.....
This statement has been made many times.
If it is true, does it indicate a multiple felony?
Is anyone actually pursuing the matter?
..... but when will we see Obama’s original long form birth certificate?
Imagine if this were George W Bush.....
This would be front page in the national media.
According to University of Washington records in Seattle, Stanley Ann Dunham registered to attend UW in Seattle on August 19th, 1961, exactly 2 weeks AFTER zero was born.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Huh?
Pre-computers, you had to be physically present to register for college classes. Two weeks doesn’t seem like enough time to have a baby, recover, make a major trip (Hawaii to Washington) with a new born, and register for classes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.