Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Dismisses Psystar Bankruptcy, Blocks Stays Against Apple
The Mac Observer ^ | August 9th, 2009 | by Jeff Gamet

Posted on 08/10/2009 12:37:23 AM PDT by Swordmaker

Psystar, the company Apple is suing for allegedly building and selling Mac clones without authorization, has been granted its motion to dismiss its Chapter 11 bankruptcy case in Florida. The Judge overseeing the case, however, included the stipulation that if Psystar files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection Apple's case against the company in California will not be subject to an automatic stay.

According to the court order, Psystar has also been blocked from filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for six months, and Judge Mark, the Judge overseeing the company's bankruptcy case, is maintaining jurisdiction over the case so he can enforce the terms of his order.

An attorney familiar with this type of case told The Mac Observer "What this means is that Psystar won't be able to use either Chapters 11 or 7 of the Bankruptcy Code to avoid trial in Judge Alsup's court, for if at the conclusion of six months proceedings are still going forward in Judge Alsup's court, I am certain that Judge Mark will not allow Psystar the protection of the Automatic Stay, should it file another Chapter 11 case."

Judge Alsup is the Judge hearing the suit Apple filed against Psystar in northern California alleging the company was violating the Mac OS X licensing agreement with end users, as well as violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act with the steps it used to install the Mac operating system on PCs. Psystar claimed that it should be allowed to build and sell PCs with Mac OS X pre-installed and that Apple is overstepping its bounds by blocking companies from selling Mac clones.

That case stalled temporarily when Psystar filed for bankruptcy protection in Florida due in part to its extensive legal bills. According to Psystar's filing the company owed Carr & Farrell, its legal team at the time, over $88,000.

The Florida court ultimately granted Apple's request to lift the automatic stay on its case, and shortly after Psystar moved to drop the bankruptcy saying it couldn't deal with the two cases at the same time.

Psystar has since hired Camara & Sibley -- the legal firm known for defending Jamie Thomas-Rasset against the RIAA in a trial that went poorly for her since she was ultimately hit with a US$1.92 million judgement -- to replace Carr & Farrell.

Psystar's posturing makes it sound as if the company has the ammunition to take down Apple thanks to its claims that it plans to show up in court with "guns blazin'."

Psystar better be prepared to reload a lot since Judge Mark's order to dismiss the bankruptcy filing also lifts any protection the company had against creditors, which means companies still waiting for payment are free to file their own cases for financial relief.

"All of Psystar's creditors are now free to sue in any court of competent jurisdiction to get their debts paid," the attorney said. "I wouldn't be surprised to see Apple institute such a law suit to recover the money that Psystar owes to it, and of course, Apple needn't sell shrink wrapped copies of OS X to a company that is in arrears on its debts to Apple."

While Psystar gears up for potential law suits from creditors, it is also dealing additional depositions for discover in Apple's case. According to Psystar's company blog, Apple lawyers had the opportunity to watch and record the installation of Mac OS X on a PC clone.

"They will observe the building process from start to finish, including the installation of OS X on our machines. We believe the only thing they will discover is what we have been open about from the start, and of course the scorching Florida heat," the company said on its blog.

While Apple's legal team was subjected to the "scorching Florida heat," Psystar is still potentially facing a scorching of its own at the hands of Apple's lawyers. The two companies are scheduled for trial on January 11, 2010, and unless a settlement or summary judgement is reached before that date, Apple looks ready to defend its copyright on Mac OS X in court.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: psystar; shyster

1 posted on 08/10/2009 12:37:24 AM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 50mm; 6SJ7; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; Aliska; altair; ...
Psystar's Chapter 11 Bankruptcy dismissed by judge... but he also prohibits any automatic stay of Apple's lawsuit against Psystar if they re-open their bankruptcy or file for Chapter 7... PING!


Apple v. Psystar Shyster Ping!

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 08/10/2009 12:40:52 AM PDT by Swordmaker (remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Link:

http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/judge_dismisses_psystar_bankruptcy_blocks_stays_against_apple/


3 posted on 08/10/2009 4:17:49 AM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Bump.


4 posted on 08/10/2009 4:35:51 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Decision time for whoever is behind Psystar; do they keep throwing $$$ down the rat hole or not?


5 posted on 08/10/2009 5:19:16 AM PDT by TheStickman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheStickman
> Decision time for whoever is behind Psystar; do they keep throwing $$$ down the rat hole or not?

Sure they will. The precedent is SCO/Microsoft vs. Linux -- Psystar's shadow backers aren't going to give up even that easy. They want to break Apple, and they are patient.

Question is, who will play PJ/Groklaw's part in this drama?

6 posted on 08/10/2009 6:50:33 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson