Republicans ARE WAY WORSE Than The Democrats

[Stephen Colbert]

The enemy you know is way worse than the enemy that acts like your friend only to stab you in the back.

Once Republicans have the numbers again in the future they're not going to reduce the size of government in any meaningful way, ever. THAT'S A PROMISE. We're on a one way path to larger and larger government.

The way Republicans talk you'd think when they're in power they'd put half the federal government and spending on the chopping block. Surely that's what the republican constituents want, right? I think politicians of both parties forget that they are not our leaders, they are our elected representatives. The difference being that we're supposed to tell them what we want, not them tell us what we should want.

Democrats tax and spend, Republicans borrow and spend. Neither ever ever ever cuts spending.

Spending and our debt exploded under Reagen, and they exploded under Bush.

At the democrats advertize that they want to spend money. They get people that actually agree with their socialist agenda to vote for them. They are wrong, but atleast they advertize what they are going to do.

Republicans however campaign on cutting spending, cutting the size of the government. But once they get in power, do they slash the government at all, do they keep any of their promises? No, not even slightly. THEY LIE TO US CONSISTENTLY, TELL US EXACTLY WHAT WE WANT TO HEAR, THEN STAB US IN THE BACK AS SOON AS THEY GET OUR VOTE.

They are the real enemy here. The size of the government, and the debt exploded under Reagen, and it exploded even more under Bush. Bush gave us Medicare Part D, the trillion dollar bailout of Wallstreet, and the 1.3 trillion dollar debt when he left office. He didn't veto a single one of these, the republicans didn't oppose any of these. They are reason we are in this mess.

Stop letting this continue.

NEVER EVER VOTE FOR A CAREER POLITICIAN, NO MATTER WHAT THEY TELL YOU, NO MATTER WHAT THEY PROMISE, THEY ARE LYING.

The only way we are ever ever going to get our country back is to elect in regular ordinary people, like Sarah Palin.

Heck I would happily support the one and only exception that proves the rule, the one and only politician that has ever ever voted against Reagen's and Bush's bloated budgets, government expansions and spending sprees, Ron Paul.

But if the GOP doesn't nominate a real person, not a politician. If they nominate another RINO like Tim Pawlentiny, or Mitt Romney or anyone in the Senate or House, I urge you please, please, don't vote for them.

Demand that Sarah Palin run as a third party candidate and vote for her instead. Even if it costs us the election, it will atleast send the GOP a message and maybe next time, they will put a real person, not a politician on the ticket.

Yes, it sucks to lose. But if we did this back in 2008, if we refused to vote for McCain and instead voted for a none-Rino. If we asked Ron Paul to run as a third party candidate and voted for him, then maybe we wouldn't have wound up with another RINO/Career Politician like Mitt Romney or Tim Pawlentiny as our nominee in 2012.

The way Republicans talk you'd think when they're in power they'd put half the federal government and spending on the chopping block.

But once in power, they never, ever, ever, ever come remotely close to doing that. Not even close. They lie to us.

So please, I beg of you, just say no. No politicians. Either we get a real person on the ticket, or vote third party.

[Mr. Silverback]

I never said I`m “offering up Ron Paul”

I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about the OP.

but what about the Kool-aider dip sticks who continually offer up the Republicrats?

If you like, I can be just as insolent as you and start talking about the Kool-aider dip sticks who offered up Ross Perot (because Bush 41 was too much of a "Republicrat") and gave us Bill Clinton. Third parties split the conservative vote, leading to Democrat victory. Of course, folks like you never seem to mind that so much.

Oh thats right,”but they`re the only other choice”.The LESSER of two evils?After McLame,I`m kind of tired of that argument.

Change "McLame" to "Ford" or even "Nixon and Ford" and you could have written that in '76 or '78. I plan to take this party back over the next three years. Those who find that too strenuous should take up knitting.

[Mr. Silverback]

I`m old school,no apologies.

Same here.

The difference is, I'm more interested in hunting RINOs than whining about them.