Posted on 08/01/2009 7:11:39 AM PDT by altair
THE EVIDENCE IS HERE: This document contains over 60 pages of evidence and analysis proving Barack Obama’s use of a little-known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack” hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans, and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know.
(Excerpt) Read more at internet-grocer.net ...
bttt
excellent.
He is very good at what he does He has been taught every well. There is a reason they keep him on TV every day. It is the ONLY thing he can do- talk and trick. I have been on the lookout for him for years and knew Hillary couldn’t make it and that he probably would. I didnt know why he creeped me out so much until reading this and putting a lot together. I hesitate to say what I really think because it would seem crazy, but I do not trust this evil man.
Maybe not willing per se, but open. Interesting that the article mentions the young and highly-educated as being most receptive to hypnosis. I would say the media was in a trance during the campaign and they are being snapped out of it now as Obama now has to do more than just TALK. He will be a two or more term Prez if he can use nefarious means to do so.
“That is why he has been trained and positioned for his present job. Who he is fronting for is the real story of his Presidency. And that has yet to be revealed.”
***********************************************************************************************************
Here’s an old thread about an even older booklet, written in 1938. “The Revolution Was”, talking about FDR and the new deal. It is ALL happening AGAIN. Almost rote!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/929392/posts
The following excerpt pertains to FDR, but I believe it is the same for Obama:
There was a prodigious literature of revolutionary thought concealed only by the respectability of its dress.... A little communism on the newsstand like that might be good for us, in fact, regarded as a twinge of pain in a robust, somewhat reckless social body. One ought to read it, perhaps, just to know. But one had tried, and what dreary stuff it had turned out to be!
To the revolutionary this same dreary stuff was the most exciting reading in the world. It was knowledge that gave him a sense of power. One who mastered the subject to the point of excellence could be fairly sure of a livelihood by teaching and writing, that is, by imparting it to others, and meanwhile dream of passing at a single leap from this mean obscurity to the prestige of one who assists in the manipulation of great happenings; while one who mastered it to the point of genius that one might dream of becoming himself the next Lenin....
This revolutionary elite was nothing you could define as a party. It had no name, no habitat, no rigid line. The only party was the Communist Party, and it was included, but its attack was too obvious and its proletarianism too crude, and moreover, it was under the stigma of not belonging. Nobody could say that about the elite above. It did belong, it was eminently respectable, and it knew the American scene. What it represented was a quantity of bitter intellectual radicalism infiltrated from the top downward as a doctorhood of professors, writers, critics, analysts, advisers, administators, directors of research, and so on a prepared revolutionary intelligence in spectacles. There was no plan to begin with. But there was a shibboleth that united them all: “Capitalism is finished.” There was one idea in which all differences could be resolved, namely, the idea of a transfer of power. For that a united front; after that, anything. And the wine of communion was a passion to play upon history with a scientific revolutionary technic.
The prestige of the elite was natural for many reasons; but it rested also upon one practical consideration. When the opportunity came a Gracchus would be needed. The elite could produce one. And that was something the Communist Party could not hope to do.
**************************************************************
From Wikipedia: Tiberius Grasshus was born in 168 BC; he was the son of Tiberius Gracchus Major and Cornelia Africana. The Gracchi were one of the most politically connected families of Rome. As a plebeian tribune, he caused political turmoil in the Republic by his attempts to legislate agrarian reforms. Tiberius’ political ideals, compounded with a gesture that was perceived as a request for a crown, eventually led to his death at the hands of supporters of the conservative faction (Optimates) of the Roman Senate.
I’m like you - I yell at the screen. I made the mistake of watching the presser last week and became nauseated...Obama makes me sick.
...”Part of it is the back and forth of his head between teleprompter screens.”...
I think he looks like a dog at a tennis match, watching the ball fly back and forth...
Thanks.
NLP is plenty real and plenty powerful for tyrannical use.
Often, even knowing about it is little protection for some people.
However, it can help to be alert, aware and certainly to use the OFF button!
I have hardly heard him speak. A little soundbite here and there. Enough to know that I intensely hate him. He has a clipped style of speech that I find very annoying. Not to mention the Marxist content. So there’s no way that I would be hypnotized by him. I haven’t given him the chance. I also hate his girlish smile, and his snooty nose up in the air. I change the channel whenever I see him or hear him.
I don’t allow him on my screen that much.
INDEED.
> And THAT is why I never bought into the ‘hopey/changey’ mantra...too much ‘thinking’ aboout what The One was saying...
Have you ever been driving down a familiar road, and had your mind somewhere else, and suddenly you’re at your destination and all of the details of your travel are completely forgotten?
Or have you ever been daydreaming, say looking out a window, and someone is talking to you and you aren’t paying any attention at all, and suddenly they startle you back into the here-and-now, and even tho’ you try your best you can’t recall a single word of their last 10 minutes “discussion”?
Those are two very typical hypnotic events that most people have experienced at one time or another.
Obama is merely using a variation of that.
Obama is merely using a variation of that.
Exactly and apparently more intelligent people are more susceptible to the effect.
I know Jim doesn't like conspiracy theories being posted here, but I've watched and observed and thought a long time since when I first read it last year. I don't think it's a conspiracy theory.
Did y'all see the photo from the beer summit where Obama was leading (without a jacket in sultry weather and his two guests still had theirs on) and the supposedly racist cop was helping Gates down the stairs? Actions speak louder than words (at least in pictures).
Cluck like a chicken.
“Ever seen one of Anthony Robbins’ events?”
No.
The premise is that there's a subconscious mind and a conscious mind. The subconscious mind is far more effective at initiating change because it acts without questioning the premises upon which it is acting. The conscious mind serves as the gatekeeper, challenging and evaluating thoughts. Most of the self help books work on getting people to embed concepts in the subconscious mind, passing the conscious mind.
These techniques are the basis for a lot of military training, learning to play musical instruments, etc. It's getting people to do something naturally, so they don't think about it.
The premise of the document is that by engaging in specific speech patterns, voice tones and physical movements, an effective manipulator can bypass the conscious to the subconscious.
So far, it seems good, but they spend too much time asserting Zero does it before delving into the actual techniques.
Reading more, and will see if I can distill it to a shorter format.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.