LOL - what makes you think THAT would be a plus??
Things are about to get mighty warm for you shortly...
Posted on 07/24/2009 4:25:54 AM PDT by National Treasure
Seconded.
SOLD DOWN THE RIVER. How Haley Barbour sabotaged eminent domain reform
Plus, although he's Conservative for the most part, he comes across as just another GOP hack. If he runs, his crowds will only be a fraction of those who attend Palin's rallies.
I’ll name three: Barbour, Jindal and Paul Ryan.
Note that I’m one of the biggest Sarah fans on this site, but it’s unwise to declare her the only acceptable nominee more than three years before the election.
This is heading in the direction of 'cult of personality' territory.
If the GOP is going to save itself, it will be by focusing on the policies, not the personalities. And Gov. Palin has no lock on true conservative policies.
You’re obviously nuts, but welcome to FR, anyway.
I have no problem with Jindal, but Paul Ryan is a GOP nobody. Get back to me after his first tippiy-toe out into the National spotlight and let me know how well it goes.
Ah, electibility....that old bugaboo that left us with Dole and then McCain as our presidential candidates. No compromise-—either all in Conservative, or not at all.
Otherwise, it's Palin, or I'm staying home in 2012.
Yeah uh, no she wouldn't. I'm not sure just how liberal she is but she's not a conservative.
By "woman's issues" you mean abortion I don't know why you choose to use a euphemism, I'm fine with the fact that some Republicans support legal abortion. But nominating a Presidential candidate that is not pro-life would be a disaster and tear the party apart. Lingle is allegedly against partial-birth and for parental notification. But still, an appreciable % (call it 5, 10, 15, beats me) of the Republican vote for President is single-issue pro-life.
And she's not conservative on other issues as well. She's a member of the RINO "Main Street Partnership". There seem to be a few members who I believe are pretty conservative, but also all the super-RINOs are in it.
I'd like to her to run for the Senate though against one of the Hawaii fossils.
Suggesting her for President and saying she would please conservatives is as silly as movie reviewers who really really liked the movie "National Treasure".
At this point in the 2000 campaign cycle, hardly anyone was talking about GWB for POTUS.
At this point in the 2008 cycle, no one seriously gave Obama a chance and Hillary! was the presumptive nominee.
Are there other conservatives I like? Sure. But to try to measure their 'viability' based on fundraising or crowd appeal vs. Gov. Palin for the 2012 race as we sit here in 2009 is rather foolhardy.
No offense, but you sound like a fool.
First, Ryan has been the party's spokesperson on economics in a number of national forums.
Second, you are pushing a nominee that almost no one even in the GOP was aware of until mid-2008. Most of those in the base outside Alaska who had heard of her had only heard of her because of her laudable handling of Trig's birth. Yet you say that Ryan is a non-starter because not enough GOPers have heard of him on this day, over three years and three months before election day.
We need to keep our options open. The penalty for screwing this up is four more years of Emperor Zero.
You know what would be really cool? It would be cool if we run a conservative candidate in 2012 who isn't Palin, and he or she loses by a percentage point or two because people like you stayed home to show us how much you value Sarah. Yeah, keeping a conservative out of the White House is the smart conservative play, right?
I'm for running a conservative nominee. I hope it's Palin but I will support anyone who wins the nomination who is not a RINO. And anyone else who isn't willing to do that is as much a part of the problem as Juan McCain and Miguel Huckabee.
Huh??
You’ve got to be kidding - this is the gov who SEALED OBAMA’s birth information and is willing participant in the cover-up.
Is that so, newb?
Heh heh.
As others have noted on thread, she's pro-choice on abortion. While she's not as bad as a liberal nut like Mark Kirk on the issue, it's far from the only issue she's wrong on. She wants to make the EPA a cabinet level position and she believes the death penalty should be abolished nationwide because it's "racist" and because "innocent" people have been convicted (never understood how someone can justify killing the unborn but not convicted murderers). Not surprisingly, she's also a very "gay friendly" Governor, though she's been noncommittal and mute on whether she'll sign a bill that would legalize gay marriage. (The Log Cabin RINO did note "In Hawaii, Linda Lingle made history in the Aloha state by being both the first Republican and the first female governor in Hawaii history. Lingle's victory came after she made strong public overtures to gay voters as Hawaii state GOP chair, including inviting Log Cabin Hawaii leader Jeff Bingham Mead to address the Hawaii Republican Party convention." ) And John Fund reported to Club for Growth that she's been a total RINO on fiscal issues:
Hawaii's RINO Governor
From John Fund, writing in the WSJ Political Diary: bq.
Hawaii Republicans were thrilled when they took control of the governorship for the first time in 40 years with the victory of Linda Lingle in 2002. Now as Ms. Lingle prepares to run for re-election, the good news is that no prominent Democrat has stepped forward to challenge her, she has raised a formidable $2.2 million in contributions and is a solid favorite. The bad news is that she is increasingly governing as a RINO, or Republican in Name Only. bq. Conservatives are so disillusioned with Ms. Lingle that several told me they now despair that Hawaii will ever overcome its high-tax and oppressive regulatory environment. Last month, Governor Lingle allowed a bill raising the minimum wage by $1 an hour over two years to become law without her signature. She has pandered to politically correct thinking by embracing a disastrous attempt to treat Native Hawaiians like an Indian tribe and create a separate, race-based government for them. And she signed a bill that gives local counties the right to raise the state's general excise tax by 12.5%. Yesterday, the Honolulu City Council voted to hike the tax to finance an as-yet undefined multibillion-dollar mass-transit monorail for a city with only 800,000 people. bq. "She's been such a disappointment that if I had to vote today, I'd leave my ballot blank," one leading conservative told me. "When the governor's staff is approached by conservatives, they are waved away and told, 'Where else do you have to go?'" Governor Lingle may well be headed for a second term, but she also is bidding to become an Aloha State version of Christine Todd Whitman, who made history by becoming New Jersey's first female governor but was so reluctant to challenge the status quo in office that her two terms are largely remembered for their mediocrity.
Sounds to me like she'd be a non-starter with any sane conservative.Quite frankly I'm surprised this thread hasn't been pulled yet. We clearly have a case of someone who signed up today for the sole purpose of posting a vanity promoting a candidate who is hostile to conservative issues. Looks like another hit-and-run job to me, and I'm pretty sure that goes against FR posting rules.
As for Lingle being a candidate to take out one of Hawaii's ancient senators (I call them Daniel K. & Daniel K. 2 because both have the same first name and middle initial) , she'd be tolerable but is far from ideal. I think she'd be another Lisa Murkowski in the Senate. That would be an improvement over what we currently get from Hawaii, but still very disappointing. I'd hold my nose for her but it's a shame we don't have someone better who would be a viable Senate candidate (and much of the blame can to go Lingle herself for failing to grow the Hawaii GOP and groom better candidates). However she's term limited in 2010 so I suppose she's going nothing better to do than to run for legislative office.
Hopefully Lt. Governor Duke Aiona succeeds her as Governor in 2010 and is an improvement. I heard he is more conservative and considered part of the "Christian right" since he is a devout Roman Catholic and had a strong pro-family track record as judge.
Do you really believe she is the "only true conservative"? Really? Or are you just being belligerent for no good reason?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.