Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patrick Swayze Pancreatic Cancer Update: Actor Looking Healthier
EON ^ | 7/16/2009

Posted on 07/17/2009 6:27:48 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

When we found out that Patrick Swayze had pancreatic cancer, we thought, “oh no, he won’t be around long.” We thought this because we know the statistics for surviving pancreatic cancer are not good, only thirteen percent. This is not to say that Swayze cannot survive this cancer . He was a healthy, fit, person, who took good care of himself before this diagnosis. Swayze does not fit the mold of a pancreatic cancer patient. Most of these patients are in their 60’s and 70’s, and are usually heavy drinkers, heavy smokers with poor diets that include lots of fats. As far as we know Patrick Swayze did not do any of these things.

There is a new treatment that Swayze is reportedly trying. It is used on inoperable cancers, and reportedly has had success on patients with the same cancer as his. This procedure is called the Cyberknife. This procedure targets the hard to reach tumors with super high amounts of radiation. As you undergo these Cyberknife procedures, you have to be awake and alert and you cannot move. These treatments are known to add years to lives. Patrick is fighting a hard battle, but his doctors are very hopeful.

In other Patrick Swayze news, Radar Online is reporting that the actor was recently seen making a fast food run with his brother. Though still very skinny, Swayze looked to be healtheir and even sported a Goatee.


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cancer; hollywood; patrickswayze; swayze
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: fieldmarshaldj
Why? If it is one of the few pleasures he can enjoy...Pancreatic cancer has a low life expectancy..

One of the surgeon's at a hospital I worked at went through the chemo for pancreatic cancer, died 1 year later. But he did continue to work until shortly before he died, mostly as a consultant.. I talked with him when my father was diagnosis with acute leukemia, (dad was in good health and living in an apartment). He suggested no chemo, especially at dads age, that's when he got into a long discussion of his cancer and he was sorry he bothered with the misery of chemo as that type of cancer has no cure rate...Sad. But that was many years ago and they may have made progress with this type of cancer...

My mother died of multiple myloma in the 1960's and they have not made much progress in that type of cancer since then..The survival rate at the time she had her cancer was 5 years....I think that still is the survival rate...For her it was only 2 years..

21 posted on 07/17/2009 7:04:50 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ODC-GIRL

No. I’ll freepmail you.


22 posted on 07/17/2009 7:10:55 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

Smoking is certainly not helping to prolong his life, which is the goal here, and no respectable doctor would regard it as wise. He’s very lucky to have made it this far.


23 posted on 07/17/2009 7:16:50 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I do wish him lots of luck....hope they have found something that can help.....


24 posted on 07/17/2009 7:23:20 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I hope the treatment works for him. He seems like a nice guy. Just staying married to Lisa for over 20 years, in that toxic Hollywood atmosphere, shows he must be.


25 posted on 07/17/2009 7:37:33 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Got it. Thanks!


26 posted on 07/17/2009 7:59:05 PM PDT by ODC-GIRL (Proudly serving our Nation's Homeland Defense... on a budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What’s all the fuss about whether he smoked. He has pancreatic cancer, not lung cancer. My confirmation sponsor died of pancreatic cancer; ate healthy food, never smoked, was always moderately thin. But he worked at a nuclear lab.


27 posted on 07/17/2009 8:10:56 PM PDT by dangus (I am Spartacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

My mother died of multiple myloma in the 1960’s and they have not made much progress in that type of cancer since then.

Things have changed in treating Myloma. New drugs have the ability to put the cancer cells in a state of dormancy. New stem cell transplant techniques (which can be trained) can now offer hope as an immuno treatment (self or blood related donar). New drugs are also in the late testing stages and getting ready for roll out.

I have MGUS (a potential precursor to myloma)...kind of lucky to have that since the chances of getting Myloma are quite low (1% chance per year). For reasons unknown, the MGUS cells never fully mutate to full blown cancer and stay lathargic.


28 posted on 07/17/2009 8:16:32 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ak267
I am glad to hear that they have made progress...With my mother is was pretty fast, but she also had MS and that had been in remission for years...so she had a compromised immune system to start with..

Its strange how some cancers are easily cured and others are stubborn as hell....I wish you all the luck and health in the world...Thank you for the info..

29 posted on 07/17/2009 8:30:37 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

There are good sources of info on Myloma treatments (present and future) from the Huntsman cancer institute, university of Arkansas or the Mayo clinic.

by the way, they’ve made good strides on MS as well using stemcell treatments. some patients are now technicaly “cured” (but still have the genetic markers so must be cautious when having children).


30 posted on 07/17/2009 8:40:09 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My FIL died of pancreatic cancer five years ago, and at that time the medical establishment said there was no discernible link between heavy drinking and pancreatic cancer. I haven’t read up on it in the five years since, though.

I hope Patrick Swayze does pull through! He was a hottie in his day, and always a fine actor.


31 posted on 07/17/2009 10:32:53 PM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (PETRAEUS IN 2012 .... Pass it on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hetty_Fauxvert

It seems to me, maybe we gravitate to this thread so we aren’t representative of the populations, but still it seems to me everyone either has/had cancer or parents have/had cancer. It is surprising to me how much cancer I see. Maybe because I have it. But threads like these where nearly all posters have a connection to this disease really make me wonder.


32 posted on 07/17/2009 10:53:38 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

There’s an awful lot of cancer around. My mother died of ovarian cancer at 67, my husband’s father died of pancreatic cancer in his 60’s, and my MIL died of cancer of the mouth in her sixties also. Very frightening. Though on the other hand, if you live long enough, SOMEthing will get you!


33 posted on 07/17/2009 11:33:30 PM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (PETRAEUS IN 2012 .... Pass it on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hetty_Fauxvert
I personally know (knew) around a dozen people who have died of pancreatic cancer in the last five years. All were under 65 (most in their 40's & 50's); and none were smokers or heavy drinkers. Half were women.

My Dad died at 62 of bile duct adenocarcimona (about the same thing, only not in the pancreas)...in fact they were shocked to find that it didn't originate there. He never drank, and never smoked.

I think that the medical establishment's propensity to blame the victim is a cover for their horrid record in coming up with treatments for some of these cancers. The standard protocol for inoperable pancreatic cancer is the SAME EXACT CHEMO THAT HAS FAILED FOR 40 YEARS....not just chemo in general...the same one: 5-FU; I kid you not.

Out here in "normal land," a 95% failure rate would be shockingly unacceptable for five years...let alone 40. For forty years they have poisoned people (and outright killed some of them) with a drug that they know perfectly well does not work.

Now, they tout a new drug gemcitabine that they combine with 5-FU; they "tout" it although the survival rate is not better. I know that very well; I read through the entire clinical trial report before my Dad signed up for Stage III of said trial. He lived for three months; in misery for most of it because of the chemo.

34 posted on 07/17/2009 11:57:05 PM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson