Posted on 06/30/2009 10:22:28 AM PDT by Perdogg
We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb.
Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.
(Excerpt) Read more at tmz.com ...
shamorr!
I don’t believe Rowe is not the mother. The daughter, Paris, looks very much like Debbie Rowe.
Certainly not news that Jackson was not the father.
What a cold woman.....cold
I never knew there was a Turkey Baster ping list on FR.
"Do I even need to say it?"
Well, that would explain her lack of interest in the children. What mother could take any amount of money and walk away from her actual child???
So if he was not the bio father, and she was not the bio mother, then what was the legal basis for his parental rights? Did he buy the necessary ingreidents and then just own the resulting kids?
Where’s the Birth Certificate?
It’s only been a few days and already I’m tired of Michael Jackson being dead.
I am surprised that Rowe was not the bio donor. Still, that is often how it’s done, using a different egg donor than the surrogate. I don’t know why the pretense of marriage was used then.
Yea at least when he was alive we could forget about him.
This just in: Michael Jackson still dead.
People need to bring cases like this up when anyone says the continued legality of double-blind adoption - a staple of the homosexual agenda - isn’t damaging to families and society as a whole. It’s likely that none of these children will ever know who their biological parents are. Aside from the mental damage that can do to a child, not knowing their own genetics can be a death sentence if any of them end up with a life-threatening that a transplant could fix.
Freak Show!
Now Al Sharpton is on the scene. It promises to get even more ridiculous.
Akk !
Probably Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston. The Whitest people on earth.
GOD!!! These poor children! Can’t everyone stop this tsunami of garbage? The media will destroy these innocent children for ratings and sales.
What a tangled web this is. If Debbie Rowe is the mother of the two older kids, they are technically Jewish under Jewish law. Since the status goes down through the female line, the daughter would pass it on to her daughter. The upshot would be that if either of those kids or a female descendant wanted to marry a Jew, they wouldn’t have to go through a full conversion. If Debbie Rowe is just a surrogate, all bets all off. Ironically Elvis’s mother was Jewish but his daughter, the first wife, would not have received that status.
“What mother could take any amount of money and walk away from her actual child???”
Sadly, a lot of people do it for free. My wife cares for premature babies at a major hospital here in California and sees a steady stream of people abandoning their kids. Probably all are on drugs. They show up, pop the million dollar baby, leave, and never return.
It is truly heartbreaking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.